Cargando…

Study protocol: building an evidence base for epidemiology emergency response, a mixed-methods study

INTRODUCTION: Determinants and drivers for emergencies, such as political instability, weak health systems, climate change and forcibly displaced populations, are increasing the severity, complexity and frequency of public health emergencies. As emergencies become more complex, it is increasingly im...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Parry, Amy Elizabeth, Kirk, Martyn D, Durrheim, David N, Olowokure, Babatunde, Housen, Tambri
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7328751/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32601115
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037326
_version_ 1783552788626669568
author Parry, Amy Elizabeth
Kirk, Martyn D
Durrheim, David N
Olowokure, Babatunde
Housen, Tambri
author_facet Parry, Amy Elizabeth
Kirk, Martyn D
Durrheim, David N
Olowokure, Babatunde
Housen, Tambri
author_sort Parry, Amy Elizabeth
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Determinants and drivers for emergencies, such as political instability, weak health systems, climate change and forcibly displaced populations, are increasing the severity, complexity and frequency of public health emergencies. As emergencies become more complex, it is increasingly important that the required skillset of the emergency response workforce is clearly defined. To enable essential epidemiological activities to be implemented and managed during an emergency, a workforce is required with the right mix of skills, knowledge, experience and local context awareness. This study aims to provide local and international responders with an opportunity to actively contribute to the development of new thinking around emergency response roles and required competencies. In this study, we will develop recommendations using a broad range of evidence to address identified lessons and challenges so that future major emergency responses are culturally and contextually appropriate, and less reliant on long-term international deployments. METHOD AND ANALYSIS: We will conduct a mixed-methods study using an exploratory sequential study design. The integration of four data sources, including key informant interviews, a scoping literature review, survey and semistructured interviews will allow the research questions to be examined in a flexible, semistructured way, from a range of perspectives. The study is unequally weighted, with a qualitative emphasis. We will analyse all activities as individual components, and then together in an integrated analysis. Thematic analysis will be conducted in NVivo V.11 and quantitative analysis will be conducted in Stata V.15. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: All activities have been approved by the Science and Medical Delegated Ethics Review Committee at the Australian National University (protocol numbers 2018–521, 2018–641, 2019–068). Findings will be disseminated through international and local deployment partners, peer-reviewed publication, presentation at international conferences and through social media such as Twitter and Facebook.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7328751
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73287512020-07-02 Study protocol: building an evidence base for epidemiology emergency response, a mixed-methods study Parry, Amy Elizabeth Kirk, Martyn D Durrheim, David N Olowokure, Babatunde Housen, Tambri BMJ Open Epidemiology INTRODUCTION: Determinants and drivers for emergencies, such as political instability, weak health systems, climate change and forcibly displaced populations, are increasing the severity, complexity and frequency of public health emergencies. As emergencies become more complex, it is increasingly important that the required skillset of the emergency response workforce is clearly defined. To enable essential epidemiological activities to be implemented and managed during an emergency, a workforce is required with the right mix of skills, knowledge, experience and local context awareness. This study aims to provide local and international responders with an opportunity to actively contribute to the development of new thinking around emergency response roles and required competencies. In this study, we will develop recommendations using a broad range of evidence to address identified lessons and challenges so that future major emergency responses are culturally and contextually appropriate, and less reliant on long-term international deployments. METHOD AND ANALYSIS: We will conduct a mixed-methods study using an exploratory sequential study design. The integration of four data sources, including key informant interviews, a scoping literature review, survey and semistructured interviews will allow the research questions to be examined in a flexible, semistructured way, from a range of perspectives. The study is unequally weighted, with a qualitative emphasis. We will analyse all activities as individual components, and then together in an integrated analysis. Thematic analysis will be conducted in NVivo V.11 and quantitative analysis will be conducted in Stata V.15. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: All activities have been approved by the Science and Medical Delegated Ethics Review Committee at the Australian National University (protocol numbers 2018–521, 2018–641, 2019–068). Findings will be disseminated through international and local deployment partners, peer-reviewed publication, presentation at international conferences and through social media such as Twitter and Facebook. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7328751/ /pubmed/32601115 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037326 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Epidemiology
Parry, Amy Elizabeth
Kirk, Martyn D
Durrheim, David N
Olowokure, Babatunde
Housen, Tambri
Study protocol: building an evidence base for epidemiology emergency response, a mixed-methods study
title Study protocol: building an evidence base for epidemiology emergency response, a mixed-methods study
title_full Study protocol: building an evidence base for epidemiology emergency response, a mixed-methods study
title_fullStr Study protocol: building an evidence base for epidemiology emergency response, a mixed-methods study
title_full_unstemmed Study protocol: building an evidence base for epidemiology emergency response, a mixed-methods study
title_short Study protocol: building an evidence base for epidemiology emergency response, a mixed-methods study
title_sort study protocol: building an evidence base for epidemiology emergency response, a mixed-methods study
topic Epidemiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7328751/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32601115
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037326
work_keys_str_mv AT parryamyelizabeth studyprotocolbuildinganevidencebaseforepidemiologyemergencyresponseamixedmethodsstudy
AT kirkmartynd studyprotocolbuildinganevidencebaseforepidemiologyemergencyresponseamixedmethodsstudy
AT durrheimdavidn studyprotocolbuildinganevidencebaseforepidemiologyemergencyresponseamixedmethodsstudy
AT olowokurebabatunde studyprotocolbuildinganevidencebaseforepidemiologyemergencyresponseamixedmethodsstudy
AT housentambri studyprotocolbuildinganevidencebaseforepidemiologyemergencyresponseamixedmethodsstudy