Cargando…
Continuity of care for patients with chronic conditions from rural or remote Australia: A systematic review
OBJECTIVE: To identify the barriers and facilitators of achieving continuity of care between health services for patients with chronic conditions living in regional, rural and remote Australia. DESIGN: A systematic literature review of peer‐reviewed journal publications between January 1990 and Apri...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7328768/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31074919 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ajr.12511 |
_version_ | 1783552790575972352 |
---|---|
author | Street, Tamara D. Somoray, Klaire Richards, Georgia C. Lacey, Sarah J. |
author_facet | Street, Tamara D. Somoray, Klaire Richards, Georgia C. Lacey, Sarah J. |
author_sort | Street, Tamara D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To identify the barriers and facilitators of achieving continuity of care between health services for patients with chronic conditions living in regional, rural and remote Australia. DESIGN: A systematic literature review of peer‐reviewed journal publications between January 1990 and April 2018. SETTING: Publications were sourced from medical and scientific databases, including: PubMed; Embase; OvidSP; ProQuest research library; and ScienceDirect. PARTICIPANTS: Studies, involving two groups, were included in the review: (a) Australian adults, residing in non‐metropolitan areas with a chronic condition, who accessed health care services; and (b) health care service providers (eg, doctors) who provided care to non‐metropolitan patients. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Facilitators and barriers of continuity of care for non‐metropolitan patients with a chronic condition. RESULTS: Initially, 536 studies were included in the review. Of these, 12 studies were found to have met the eligibility criteria and were included in the final analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Coordination of health care services for non‐metropolitan patients with chronic conditions substantially improves the outcomes for patients. Overall, communication, availability of resources and location are the major barriers and facilitators to continuity of care, depending on how they are managed. Recommendations have been provided to assist practitioners and policy‐makers to improve the experience of shared care and health outcomes for non‐metropolitan patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7328768 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73287682020-07-02 Continuity of care for patients with chronic conditions from rural or remote Australia: A systematic review Street, Tamara D. Somoray, Klaire Richards, Georgia C. Lacey, Sarah J. Aust J Rural Health Systematic Review OBJECTIVE: To identify the barriers and facilitators of achieving continuity of care between health services for patients with chronic conditions living in regional, rural and remote Australia. DESIGN: A systematic literature review of peer‐reviewed journal publications between January 1990 and April 2018. SETTING: Publications were sourced from medical and scientific databases, including: PubMed; Embase; OvidSP; ProQuest research library; and ScienceDirect. PARTICIPANTS: Studies, involving two groups, were included in the review: (a) Australian adults, residing in non‐metropolitan areas with a chronic condition, who accessed health care services; and (b) health care service providers (eg, doctors) who provided care to non‐metropolitan patients. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Facilitators and barriers of continuity of care for non‐metropolitan patients with a chronic condition. RESULTS: Initially, 536 studies were included in the review. Of these, 12 studies were found to have met the eligibility criteria and were included in the final analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Coordination of health care services for non‐metropolitan patients with chronic conditions substantially improves the outcomes for patients. Overall, communication, availability of resources and location are the major barriers and facilitators to continuity of care, depending on how they are managed. Recommendations have been provided to assist practitioners and policy‐makers to improve the experience of shared care and health outcomes for non‐metropolitan patients. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-05-10 2019-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7328768/ /pubmed/31074919 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ajr.12511 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Australian Journal of Rural Health published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of National Rural Health Alliance Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Street, Tamara D. Somoray, Klaire Richards, Georgia C. Lacey, Sarah J. Continuity of care for patients with chronic conditions from rural or remote Australia: A systematic review |
title | Continuity of care for patients with chronic conditions from rural or remote Australia: A systematic review |
title_full | Continuity of care for patients with chronic conditions from rural or remote Australia: A systematic review |
title_fullStr | Continuity of care for patients with chronic conditions from rural or remote Australia: A systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Continuity of care for patients with chronic conditions from rural or remote Australia: A systematic review |
title_short | Continuity of care for patients with chronic conditions from rural or remote Australia: A systematic review |
title_sort | continuity of care for patients with chronic conditions from rural or remote australia: a systematic review |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7328768/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31074919 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ajr.12511 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT streettamarad continuityofcareforpatientswithchronicconditionsfromruralorremoteaustraliaasystematicreview AT somorayklaire continuityofcareforpatientswithchronicconditionsfromruralorremoteaustraliaasystematicreview AT richardsgeorgiac continuityofcareforpatientswithchronicconditionsfromruralorremoteaustraliaasystematicreview AT laceysarahj continuityofcareforpatientswithchronicconditionsfromruralorremoteaustraliaasystematicreview |