Cargando…

Randomized Controlled Clinical Study to Determine the Oral and Dermal Tolerability of an Experimental Denture Wipe

PURPOSE: To evaluate oral and dermal tolerance following use and user acceptability of an experimental denture‐cleansing wipe. An exploratory objective was to develop a method to assess denture wipe effectiveness in removing debris from denture surfaces. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a single‐cent...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Axe, Alyson, Burnett, Gary R., Milleman, Kimberly R., Patil, Avinash, Milleman, Jeffery L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7328799/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30365198
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12992
_version_ 1783552795681488896
author Axe, Alyson
Burnett, Gary R.
Milleman, Kimberly R.
Patil, Avinash
Milleman, Jeffery L.
author_facet Axe, Alyson
Burnett, Gary R.
Milleman, Kimberly R.
Patil, Avinash
Milleman, Jeffery L.
author_sort Axe, Alyson
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate oral and dermal tolerance following use and user acceptability of an experimental denture‐cleansing wipe. An exploratory objective was to develop a method to assess denture wipe effectiveness in removing debris from denture surfaces. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a single‐center, randomized, controlled, parallel‐group, examiner‐blind study in participants with ≥1 full/partial denture. Participants were randomized to clean their dentures with the denture wipe (n = 76) or water (n = 76) up to 4 times per day for 14 days. Tolerability was assessed by treatment‐emergent adverse events (TEAEs), oral soft tissue examination, and lead hand dermatological assessment. Acceptability was assessed by questionnaire. The feasibility of a methodology to assess the efficacy of the wipe at removing food particles was also evaluated through determination of the mass of chewed peanut particles that the wipe removed after a single use (n = 31). RESULTS: The proportion of participants experiencing oral TEAEs by day 14 was 0.039% with the denture wipe (lip injury [n = 1], mouth injury [n = 2]) and 0.013% with the water rinse (coated tongue [n = 1]). There were no dermal TEAEs and no TEAE‐related study withdrawals. Skin irritation scores with the denture wipe remained unchanged from baseline. Comparing before vs. after cleaning with the denture wipe, a higher proportion of participants rated their dentures as feeling extremely/very fresh (28.9% pre‐/85.5% post‐cleaning), feeling extremely/very clean (34.2%/86.8%) and looking extremely/very clean (43.5%/85.5%). More denture‐wipe group participants than water‐rinse group participants were extremely/very satisfied with the amount of debris removed from their dentures (88.1% vs 72.4%). The methodology used to assess the weight of peanut particles captured from the wipes/dentures appeared to be a feasible investigation technique. CONCLUSIONS: The denture wipe was generally well‐tolerated and had good user acceptability. The methodology for assessing the mass of peanut particles removed by denture wipes was successful.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7328799
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73287992020-07-02 Randomized Controlled Clinical Study to Determine the Oral and Dermal Tolerability of an Experimental Denture Wipe Axe, Alyson Burnett, Gary R. Milleman, Kimberly R. Patil, Avinash Milleman, Jeffery L. J Prosthodont Original Manuscripts PURPOSE: To evaluate oral and dermal tolerance following use and user acceptability of an experimental denture‐cleansing wipe. An exploratory objective was to develop a method to assess denture wipe effectiveness in removing debris from denture surfaces. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a single‐center, randomized, controlled, parallel‐group, examiner‐blind study in participants with ≥1 full/partial denture. Participants were randomized to clean their dentures with the denture wipe (n = 76) or water (n = 76) up to 4 times per day for 14 days. Tolerability was assessed by treatment‐emergent adverse events (TEAEs), oral soft tissue examination, and lead hand dermatological assessment. Acceptability was assessed by questionnaire. The feasibility of a methodology to assess the efficacy of the wipe at removing food particles was also evaluated through determination of the mass of chewed peanut particles that the wipe removed after a single use (n = 31). RESULTS: The proportion of participants experiencing oral TEAEs by day 14 was 0.039% with the denture wipe (lip injury [n = 1], mouth injury [n = 2]) and 0.013% with the water rinse (coated tongue [n = 1]). There were no dermal TEAEs and no TEAE‐related study withdrawals. Skin irritation scores with the denture wipe remained unchanged from baseline. Comparing before vs. after cleaning with the denture wipe, a higher proportion of participants rated their dentures as feeling extremely/very fresh (28.9% pre‐/85.5% post‐cleaning), feeling extremely/very clean (34.2%/86.8%) and looking extremely/very clean (43.5%/85.5%). More denture‐wipe group participants than water‐rinse group participants were extremely/very satisfied with the amount of debris removed from their dentures (88.1% vs 72.4%). The methodology used to assess the weight of peanut particles captured from the wipes/dentures appeared to be a feasible investigation technique. CONCLUSIONS: The denture wipe was generally well‐tolerated and had good user acceptability. The methodology for assessing the mass of peanut particles removed by denture wipes was successful. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-11-28 2019-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7328799/ /pubmed/30365198 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12992 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Journal of Prosthodontics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American College of Prosthodontists This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Manuscripts
Axe, Alyson
Burnett, Gary R.
Milleman, Kimberly R.
Patil, Avinash
Milleman, Jeffery L.
Randomized Controlled Clinical Study to Determine the Oral and Dermal Tolerability of an Experimental Denture Wipe
title Randomized Controlled Clinical Study to Determine the Oral and Dermal Tolerability of an Experimental Denture Wipe
title_full Randomized Controlled Clinical Study to Determine the Oral and Dermal Tolerability of an Experimental Denture Wipe
title_fullStr Randomized Controlled Clinical Study to Determine the Oral and Dermal Tolerability of an Experimental Denture Wipe
title_full_unstemmed Randomized Controlled Clinical Study to Determine the Oral and Dermal Tolerability of an Experimental Denture Wipe
title_short Randomized Controlled Clinical Study to Determine the Oral and Dermal Tolerability of an Experimental Denture Wipe
title_sort randomized controlled clinical study to determine the oral and dermal tolerability of an experimental denture wipe
topic Original Manuscripts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7328799/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30365198
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12992
work_keys_str_mv AT axealyson randomizedcontrolledclinicalstudytodeterminetheoralanddermaltolerabilityofanexperimentaldenturewipe
AT burnettgaryr randomizedcontrolledclinicalstudytodeterminetheoralanddermaltolerabilityofanexperimentaldenturewipe
AT millemankimberlyr randomizedcontrolledclinicalstudytodeterminetheoralanddermaltolerabilityofanexperimentaldenturewipe
AT patilavinash randomizedcontrolledclinicalstudytodeterminetheoralanddermaltolerabilityofanexperimentaldenturewipe
AT millemanjefferyl randomizedcontrolledclinicalstudytodeterminetheoralanddermaltolerabilityofanexperimentaldenturewipe