Cargando…

Study protocol for the ACT response pilot intervention: development, implementation and evaluation of a systems-based Agitation Code Team (ACT) in the emergency department

INTRODUCTION: Emergency department (ED) visits for behavioural conditions are rising, with 1.7 million associated episodes of patient agitation occurring annually in acute care settings. When de-escalation techniques fail during agitation management, patients are subject to use of physical restraint...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wong, Ambrose H, Ray, Jessica M, Auerbach, Marc A, Venkatesh, Arjun K, McVaney, Caitlin, Burness, Danielle, Chmura, Christopher, Saxa, Thomas, Sevilla, Mark, Flood, Colin T, Patel, Amitkumar, Whitfill, Travis, Dziura, James D, Yonkers, Kimberly A, Ulrich, Andrew, Bernstein, Steven L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7328814/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32606062
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-036982
_version_ 1783552798490624000
author Wong, Ambrose H
Ray, Jessica M
Auerbach, Marc A
Venkatesh, Arjun K
McVaney, Caitlin
Burness, Danielle
Chmura, Christopher
Saxa, Thomas
Sevilla, Mark
Flood, Colin T
Patel, Amitkumar
Whitfill, Travis
Dziura, James D
Yonkers, Kimberly A
Ulrich, Andrew
Bernstein, Steven L
author_facet Wong, Ambrose H
Ray, Jessica M
Auerbach, Marc A
Venkatesh, Arjun K
McVaney, Caitlin
Burness, Danielle
Chmura, Christopher
Saxa, Thomas
Sevilla, Mark
Flood, Colin T
Patel, Amitkumar
Whitfill, Travis
Dziura, James D
Yonkers, Kimberly A
Ulrich, Andrew
Bernstein, Steven L
author_sort Wong, Ambrose H
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Emergency department (ED) visits for behavioural conditions are rising, with 1.7 million associated episodes of patient agitation occurring annually in acute care settings. When de-escalation techniques fail during agitation management, patients are subject to use of physical restraints and sedatives, which are associated with up to 37% risk of hypotension, apnoea and physical injuries. At the same time, ED staff report workplace violence due to physical assaults during agitation events. We recently developed a theoretical framework to characterise ED agitation, which identified teamwork as a critical component to reduce harm. Currently, no structured team response protocol for ED agitation addressing both patient and staff safety exists. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Our proposed study aims to develop and implement the agitation code team (ACT) response intervention, which will consist of a standardised, structured process with defined health worker roles/responsibilities, work processes and clinical protocols. First, we will develop the ACT response intervention in a two-step design loop; conceptual design will engage users in the creation of the prototype, and iterative refinement will occur through in situ simulated agitated patient encounters in the ED to assess and improve the design. Next, we will pilot the intervention in the clinical environment and use a controlled interrupted time series design to evaluate its effect on our primary outcome of patient restraint use. The intervention will be considered efficacious if we effectively lower the rate of restraint use over a 6-month period. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval by the Yale University Human Investigation Committee was obtained in 2019 (HIC #2000025113). Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and presentations at scientific meetings for each phase of the study. If this pilot is successful, we plan to formally integrate the ACT response intervention into clinical workflows at all EDs within our entire health system.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7328814
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73288142020-07-02 Study protocol for the ACT response pilot intervention: development, implementation and evaluation of a systems-based Agitation Code Team (ACT) in the emergency department Wong, Ambrose H Ray, Jessica M Auerbach, Marc A Venkatesh, Arjun K McVaney, Caitlin Burness, Danielle Chmura, Christopher Saxa, Thomas Sevilla, Mark Flood, Colin T Patel, Amitkumar Whitfill, Travis Dziura, James D Yonkers, Kimberly A Ulrich, Andrew Bernstein, Steven L BMJ Open Emergency Medicine INTRODUCTION: Emergency department (ED) visits for behavioural conditions are rising, with 1.7 million associated episodes of patient agitation occurring annually in acute care settings. When de-escalation techniques fail during agitation management, patients are subject to use of physical restraints and sedatives, which are associated with up to 37% risk of hypotension, apnoea and physical injuries. At the same time, ED staff report workplace violence due to physical assaults during agitation events. We recently developed a theoretical framework to characterise ED agitation, which identified teamwork as a critical component to reduce harm. Currently, no structured team response protocol for ED agitation addressing both patient and staff safety exists. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Our proposed study aims to develop and implement the agitation code team (ACT) response intervention, which will consist of a standardised, structured process with defined health worker roles/responsibilities, work processes and clinical protocols. First, we will develop the ACT response intervention in a two-step design loop; conceptual design will engage users in the creation of the prototype, and iterative refinement will occur through in situ simulated agitated patient encounters in the ED to assess and improve the design. Next, we will pilot the intervention in the clinical environment and use a controlled interrupted time series design to evaluate its effect on our primary outcome of patient restraint use. The intervention will be considered efficacious if we effectively lower the rate of restraint use over a 6-month period. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval by the Yale University Human Investigation Committee was obtained in 2019 (HIC #2000025113). Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and presentations at scientific meetings for each phase of the study. If this pilot is successful, we plan to formally integrate the ACT response intervention into clinical workflows at all EDs within our entire health system. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7328814/ /pubmed/32606062 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-036982 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Emergency Medicine
Wong, Ambrose H
Ray, Jessica M
Auerbach, Marc A
Venkatesh, Arjun K
McVaney, Caitlin
Burness, Danielle
Chmura, Christopher
Saxa, Thomas
Sevilla, Mark
Flood, Colin T
Patel, Amitkumar
Whitfill, Travis
Dziura, James D
Yonkers, Kimberly A
Ulrich, Andrew
Bernstein, Steven L
Study protocol for the ACT response pilot intervention: development, implementation and evaluation of a systems-based Agitation Code Team (ACT) in the emergency department
title Study protocol for the ACT response pilot intervention: development, implementation and evaluation of a systems-based Agitation Code Team (ACT) in the emergency department
title_full Study protocol for the ACT response pilot intervention: development, implementation and evaluation of a systems-based Agitation Code Team (ACT) in the emergency department
title_fullStr Study protocol for the ACT response pilot intervention: development, implementation and evaluation of a systems-based Agitation Code Team (ACT) in the emergency department
title_full_unstemmed Study protocol for the ACT response pilot intervention: development, implementation and evaluation of a systems-based Agitation Code Team (ACT) in the emergency department
title_short Study protocol for the ACT response pilot intervention: development, implementation and evaluation of a systems-based Agitation Code Team (ACT) in the emergency department
title_sort study protocol for the act response pilot intervention: development, implementation and evaluation of a systems-based agitation code team (act) in the emergency department
topic Emergency Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7328814/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32606062
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-036982
work_keys_str_mv AT wongambroseh studyprotocolfortheactresponsepilotinterventiondevelopmentimplementationandevaluationofasystemsbasedagitationcodeteamactintheemergencydepartment
AT rayjessicam studyprotocolfortheactresponsepilotinterventiondevelopmentimplementationandevaluationofasystemsbasedagitationcodeteamactintheemergencydepartment
AT auerbachmarca studyprotocolfortheactresponsepilotinterventiondevelopmentimplementationandevaluationofasystemsbasedagitationcodeteamactintheemergencydepartment
AT venkatesharjunk studyprotocolfortheactresponsepilotinterventiondevelopmentimplementationandevaluationofasystemsbasedagitationcodeteamactintheemergencydepartment
AT mcvaneycaitlin studyprotocolfortheactresponsepilotinterventiondevelopmentimplementationandevaluationofasystemsbasedagitationcodeteamactintheemergencydepartment
AT burnessdanielle studyprotocolfortheactresponsepilotinterventiondevelopmentimplementationandevaluationofasystemsbasedagitationcodeteamactintheemergencydepartment
AT chmurachristopher studyprotocolfortheactresponsepilotinterventiondevelopmentimplementationandevaluationofasystemsbasedagitationcodeteamactintheemergencydepartment
AT saxathomas studyprotocolfortheactresponsepilotinterventiondevelopmentimplementationandevaluationofasystemsbasedagitationcodeteamactintheemergencydepartment
AT sevillamark studyprotocolfortheactresponsepilotinterventiondevelopmentimplementationandevaluationofasystemsbasedagitationcodeteamactintheemergencydepartment
AT floodcolint studyprotocolfortheactresponsepilotinterventiondevelopmentimplementationandevaluationofasystemsbasedagitationcodeteamactintheemergencydepartment
AT patelamitkumar studyprotocolfortheactresponsepilotinterventiondevelopmentimplementationandevaluationofasystemsbasedagitationcodeteamactintheemergencydepartment
AT whitfilltravis studyprotocolfortheactresponsepilotinterventiondevelopmentimplementationandevaluationofasystemsbasedagitationcodeteamactintheemergencydepartment
AT dziurajamesd studyprotocolfortheactresponsepilotinterventiondevelopmentimplementationandevaluationofasystemsbasedagitationcodeteamactintheemergencydepartment
AT yonkerskimberlya studyprotocolfortheactresponsepilotinterventiondevelopmentimplementationandevaluationofasystemsbasedagitationcodeteamactintheemergencydepartment
AT ulrichandrew studyprotocolfortheactresponsepilotinterventiondevelopmentimplementationandevaluationofasystemsbasedagitationcodeteamactintheemergencydepartment
AT bernsteinstevenl studyprotocolfortheactresponsepilotinterventiondevelopmentimplementationandevaluationofasystemsbasedagitationcodeteamactintheemergencydepartment