Cargando…
Pest risk assessment of Eotetranychus lewisi for the EU territory
Following the 2014 EFSA's Panel on Plant Health scientific opinion on the pest categorisation of the spider mite Eotetranychus lewisi, the European Commission requested the Panel to perform a pest risk assessment and evaluate the risk reduction options. A stochastic model was used to assess ent...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7328886/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32625281 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4878 |
_version_ | 1783552810121428992 |
---|---|
author | Jeger, Michael Bragard, Claude Caffier, David Candresse, Thierry Chatzivassiliou, Elisavet Dehnen‐Schmutz, Katharina Gilioli, Gianni Grégoire, Jean‐Claude Jaques Miret, Josep Anton MacLeod, Alan Niere, Bjoern Parnell, Stephen Potting, Roel Rafoss, Trond Rossi, Vittorio Urek, Gregor Van Bruggen, Ariena Van Der Werf, Wopke West, Jonathan Winter, Stephan Bergeretti, Filippo Bjorklund, Niklas Mosbach‐Schulz, Olaf Vos, Sybren Navajas Navarro, Maria |
author_facet | Jeger, Michael Bragard, Claude Caffier, David Candresse, Thierry Chatzivassiliou, Elisavet Dehnen‐Schmutz, Katharina Gilioli, Gianni Grégoire, Jean‐Claude Jaques Miret, Josep Anton MacLeod, Alan Niere, Bjoern Parnell, Stephen Potting, Roel Rafoss, Trond Rossi, Vittorio Urek, Gregor Van Bruggen, Ariena Van Der Werf, Wopke West, Jonathan Winter, Stephan Bergeretti, Filippo Bjorklund, Niklas Mosbach‐Schulz, Olaf Vos, Sybren Navajas Navarro, Maria |
collection | PubMed |
description | Following the 2014 EFSA's Panel on Plant Health scientific opinion on the pest categorisation of the spider mite Eotetranychus lewisi, the European Commission requested the Panel to perform a pest risk assessment and evaluate the risk reduction options. A stochastic model was used to assess entry, establishment and spread and related uncertainties. In the EU, E. lewisi has only been reported to occur in Portugal (Madeira). Entry pathways assessed were strawberry plants for planting from the USA, poinsettia and raspberry plants for planting, and orange and lemon fruits from third countries. Entry is most likely via poinsettia. Under current EU phytosanitary requirements, there is around a one in ten chance that E. lewisi will establish outdoors over the next 10 years. Although unlikely, establishment would most likely occur in southern Europe where environmental conditions, temperature and host density, are most suitable. If E. lewisi did establish, pest spread is expected to be mainly human assisted, most likely the mite being transported long distances on plants for planting. Nevertheless, while remaining a regulated pest, spread would be slow and most likely confined to one NUTS 2 area after 10 years. Under a scenario with enhanced measures (pest free place of production) at origin, the Panel's assessment indicate that it is extremely unlikely that E. lewisi would establish within 10 years hence spread is also extremely unlikely. The absence of trade of host plants from Madeira to other parts of the EU could explain why E. lewisi has not spread to other EU Member States. E. lewisi is reported as reducing yield and quality of peaches and poinsettia and is regarded as a growing concern for strawberry and raspberry growers in the Americas. The Panel concludes that should E. lewisi be introduced in the EU similar impacts could be expected. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7328886 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73288862020-07-02 Pest risk assessment of Eotetranychus lewisi for the EU territory Jeger, Michael Bragard, Claude Caffier, David Candresse, Thierry Chatzivassiliou, Elisavet Dehnen‐Schmutz, Katharina Gilioli, Gianni Grégoire, Jean‐Claude Jaques Miret, Josep Anton MacLeod, Alan Niere, Bjoern Parnell, Stephen Potting, Roel Rafoss, Trond Rossi, Vittorio Urek, Gregor Van Bruggen, Ariena Van Der Werf, Wopke West, Jonathan Winter, Stephan Bergeretti, Filippo Bjorklund, Niklas Mosbach‐Schulz, Olaf Vos, Sybren Navajas Navarro, Maria EFSA J Scientific Opinion Following the 2014 EFSA's Panel on Plant Health scientific opinion on the pest categorisation of the spider mite Eotetranychus lewisi, the European Commission requested the Panel to perform a pest risk assessment and evaluate the risk reduction options. A stochastic model was used to assess entry, establishment and spread and related uncertainties. In the EU, E. lewisi has only been reported to occur in Portugal (Madeira). Entry pathways assessed were strawberry plants for planting from the USA, poinsettia and raspberry plants for planting, and orange and lemon fruits from third countries. Entry is most likely via poinsettia. Under current EU phytosanitary requirements, there is around a one in ten chance that E. lewisi will establish outdoors over the next 10 years. Although unlikely, establishment would most likely occur in southern Europe where environmental conditions, temperature and host density, are most suitable. If E. lewisi did establish, pest spread is expected to be mainly human assisted, most likely the mite being transported long distances on plants for planting. Nevertheless, while remaining a regulated pest, spread would be slow and most likely confined to one NUTS 2 area after 10 years. Under a scenario with enhanced measures (pest free place of production) at origin, the Panel's assessment indicate that it is extremely unlikely that E. lewisi would establish within 10 years hence spread is also extremely unlikely. The absence of trade of host plants from Madeira to other parts of the EU could explain why E. lewisi has not spread to other EU Member States. E. lewisi is reported as reducing yield and quality of peaches and poinsettia and is regarded as a growing concern for strawberry and raspberry growers in the Americas. The Panel concludes that should E. lewisi be introduced in the EU similar impacts could be expected. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7328886/ /pubmed/32625281 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4878 Text en © 2017 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Opinion Jeger, Michael Bragard, Claude Caffier, David Candresse, Thierry Chatzivassiliou, Elisavet Dehnen‐Schmutz, Katharina Gilioli, Gianni Grégoire, Jean‐Claude Jaques Miret, Josep Anton MacLeod, Alan Niere, Bjoern Parnell, Stephen Potting, Roel Rafoss, Trond Rossi, Vittorio Urek, Gregor Van Bruggen, Ariena Van Der Werf, Wopke West, Jonathan Winter, Stephan Bergeretti, Filippo Bjorklund, Niklas Mosbach‐Schulz, Olaf Vos, Sybren Navajas Navarro, Maria Pest risk assessment of Eotetranychus lewisi for the EU territory |
title | Pest risk assessment of Eotetranychus lewisi for the EU territory |
title_full | Pest risk assessment of Eotetranychus lewisi for the EU territory |
title_fullStr | Pest risk assessment of Eotetranychus lewisi for the EU territory |
title_full_unstemmed | Pest risk assessment of Eotetranychus lewisi for the EU territory |
title_short | Pest risk assessment of Eotetranychus lewisi for the EU territory |
title_sort | pest risk assessment of eotetranychus lewisi for the eu territory |
topic | Scientific Opinion |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7328886/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32625281 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4878 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pestriskassessmentofeotetranychuslewisifortheeuterritory AT jegermichael pestriskassessmentofeotetranychuslewisifortheeuterritory AT bragardclaude pestriskassessmentofeotetranychuslewisifortheeuterritory AT caffierdavid pestriskassessmentofeotetranychuslewisifortheeuterritory AT candressethierry pestriskassessmentofeotetranychuslewisifortheeuterritory AT chatzivassiliouelisavet pestriskassessmentofeotetranychuslewisifortheeuterritory AT dehnenschmutzkatharina pestriskassessmentofeotetranychuslewisifortheeuterritory AT gilioligianni pestriskassessmentofeotetranychuslewisifortheeuterritory AT gregoirejeanclaude pestriskassessmentofeotetranychuslewisifortheeuterritory AT jaquesmiretjosepanton pestriskassessmentofeotetranychuslewisifortheeuterritory AT macleodalan pestriskassessmentofeotetranychuslewisifortheeuterritory AT nierebjoern pestriskassessmentofeotetranychuslewisifortheeuterritory AT parnellstephen pestriskassessmentofeotetranychuslewisifortheeuterritory AT pottingroel pestriskassessmentofeotetranychuslewisifortheeuterritory AT rafosstrond pestriskassessmentofeotetranychuslewisifortheeuterritory AT rossivittorio pestriskassessmentofeotetranychuslewisifortheeuterritory AT urekgregor pestriskassessmentofeotetranychuslewisifortheeuterritory AT vanbruggenariena pestriskassessmentofeotetranychuslewisifortheeuterritory AT vanderwerfwopke pestriskassessmentofeotetranychuslewisifortheeuterritory AT westjonathan pestriskassessmentofeotetranychuslewisifortheeuterritory AT winterstephan pestriskassessmentofeotetranychuslewisifortheeuterritory AT bergerettifilippo pestriskassessmentofeotetranychuslewisifortheeuterritory AT bjorklundniklas pestriskassessmentofeotetranychuslewisifortheeuterritory AT mosbachschulzolaf pestriskassessmentofeotetranychuslewisifortheeuterritory AT vossybren pestriskassessmentofeotetranychuslewisifortheeuterritory AT navajasnavarromaria pestriskassessmentofeotetranychuslewisifortheeuterritory |