Cargando…

Cost-effectiveness analysis of genetic diagnostic strategies for Lynch syndrome in Italy

Lynch syndrome (LS) is an autosomal dominant condition caused by pathogenic variants in mismatch repair (MMR) genes that predispose individuals to different malignancies, such as colorectal cancer (CRC) and endometrial cancer. Current guidelines recommended testing for LS in individuals with newly d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pastorino, Roberta, Basile, Michele, Tognetto, Alessia, Di Marco, Marco, Grossi, Adriano, Lucci-Cordisco, Emanuela, Scaldaferri, Franco, De Censi, Andrea, Federici, Antonio, Villari, Paolo, Genuardi, Maurizio, Ricciardi, Walter, Boccia, Stefania
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7329085/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32609729
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0235038
_version_ 1783552846450393088
author Pastorino, Roberta
Basile, Michele
Tognetto, Alessia
Di Marco, Marco
Grossi, Adriano
Lucci-Cordisco, Emanuela
Scaldaferri, Franco
De Censi, Andrea
Federici, Antonio
Villari, Paolo
Genuardi, Maurizio
Ricciardi, Walter
Boccia, Stefania
author_facet Pastorino, Roberta
Basile, Michele
Tognetto, Alessia
Di Marco, Marco
Grossi, Adriano
Lucci-Cordisco, Emanuela
Scaldaferri, Franco
De Censi, Andrea
Federici, Antonio
Villari, Paolo
Genuardi, Maurizio
Ricciardi, Walter
Boccia, Stefania
author_sort Pastorino, Roberta
collection PubMed
description Lynch syndrome (LS) is an autosomal dominant condition caused by pathogenic variants in mismatch repair (MMR) genes that predispose individuals to different malignancies, such as colorectal cancer (CRC) and endometrial cancer. Current guidelines recommended testing for LS in individuals with newly diagnosed CRC to reduce cancer morbidity and mortality in relatives. Economic evaluations in support of such approach, however, are not available in Italy. We developed a decision-analytic model to analyze the cost-effectiveness of LS screening from the perspective of the Italian National Health System. Three testing strategies: the sequencing of all MMR genes without prior tumor analysis (Strategy 1), a sequential IHC and MS-MLPA analysis (Strategy 2), and an age-targeted strategy with a revised Bethesda criteria assessment before IHC and methylation-specific MLPA for patients ≥ than 70 years old (Strategy 3) were analyzed and compared to the “no testing” strategy. Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) in relatives after colonoscopy, aspirin prophylaxis and an intensive gynecological surveillance were estimated through a Markov model. Assuming a CRC incidence rate of 0.09% and a share of patients affected by LS equal to 2.81%, the number of detected pathogenic variants among CRC cases ranges, in a given year, between 910 and 1167 depending on the testing strategy employed. The testing strategies investigated, provided one-time to the entire eligible population (CRC patients), were associated with an overall cost ranging between €1,753,059.93-€10,388,000.00. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of the Markov model ranged from €941.24 /QALY to €1,681.93 /QALY, thus supporting that “universal testing” versus “no testing” is cost-effective, but not necessarily in comparison with age-targeted strategies. This is the first economic evaluation on different testing strategies for LS in Italy. The results might support the introduction of cost-effective recommendations for LS screening in Italy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7329085
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73290852020-07-14 Cost-effectiveness analysis of genetic diagnostic strategies for Lynch syndrome in Italy Pastorino, Roberta Basile, Michele Tognetto, Alessia Di Marco, Marco Grossi, Adriano Lucci-Cordisco, Emanuela Scaldaferri, Franco De Censi, Andrea Federici, Antonio Villari, Paolo Genuardi, Maurizio Ricciardi, Walter Boccia, Stefania PLoS One Research Article Lynch syndrome (LS) is an autosomal dominant condition caused by pathogenic variants in mismatch repair (MMR) genes that predispose individuals to different malignancies, such as colorectal cancer (CRC) and endometrial cancer. Current guidelines recommended testing for LS in individuals with newly diagnosed CRC to reduce cancer morbidity and mortality in relatives. Economic evaluations in support of such approach, however, are not available in Italy. We developed a decision-analytic model to analyze the cost-effectiveness of LS screening from the perspective of the Italian National Health System. Three testing strategies: the sequencing of all MMR genes without prior tumor analysis (Strategy 1), a sequential IHC and MS-MLPA analysis (Strategy 2), and an age-targeted strategy with a revised Bethesda criteria assessment before IHC and methylation-specific MLPA for patients ≥ than 70 years old (Strategy 3) were analyzed and compared to the “no testing” strategy. Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) in relatives after colonoscopy, aspirin prophylaxis and an intensive gynecological surveillance were estimated through a Markov model. Assuming a CRC incidence rate of 0.09% and a share of patients affected by LS equal to 2.81%, the number of detected pathogenic variants among CRC cases ranges, in a given year, between 910 and 1167 depending on the testing strategy employed. The testing strategies investigated, provided one-time to the entire eligible population (CRC patients), were associated with an overall cost ranging between €1,753,059.93-€10,388,000.00. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of the Markov model ranged from €941.24 /QALY to €1,681.93 /QALY, thus supporting that “universal testing” versus “no testing” is cost-effective, but not necessarily in comparison with age-targeted strategies. This is the first economic evaluation on different testing strategies for LS in Italy. The results might support the introduction of cost-effective recommendations for LS screening in Italy. Public Library of Science 2020-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7329085/ /pubmed/32609729 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0235038 Text en © 2020 Pastorino et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Pastorino, Roberta
Basile, Michele
Tognetto, Alessia
Di Marco, Marco
Grossi, Adriano
Lucci-Cordisco, Emanuela
Scaldaferri, Franco
De Censi, Andrea
Federici, Antonio
Villari, Paolo
Genuardi, Maurizio
Ricciardi, Walter
Boccia, Stefania
Cost-effectiveness analysis of genetic diagnostic strategies for Lynch syndrome in Italy
title Cost-effectiveness analysis of genetic diagnostic strategies for Lynch syndrome in Italy
title_full Cost-effectiveness analysis of genetic diagnostic strategies for Lynch syndrome in Italy
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness analysis of genetic diagnostic strategies for Lynch syndrome in Italy
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness analysis of genetic diagnostic strategies for Lynch syndrome in Italy
title_short Cost-effectiveness analysis of genetic diagnostic strategies for Lynch syndrome in Italy
title_sort cost-effectiveness analysis of genetic diagnostic strategies for lynch syndrome in italy
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7329085/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32609729
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0235038
work_keys_str_mv AT pastorinoroberta costeffectivenessanalysisofgeneticdiagnosticstrategiesforlynchsyndromeinitaly
AT basilemichele costeffectivenessanalysisofgeneticdiagnosticstrategiesforlynchsyndromeinitaly
AT tognettoalessia costeffectivenessanalysisofgeneticdiagnosticstrategiesforlynchsyndromeinitaly
AT dimarcomarco costeffectivenessanalysisofgeneticdiagnosticstrategiesforlynchsyndromeinitaly
AT grossiadriano costeffectivenessanalysisofgeneticdiagnosticstrategiesforlynchsyndromeinitaly
AT luccicordiscoemanuela costeffectivenessanalysisofgeneticdiagnosticstrategiesforlynchsyndromeinitaly
AT scaldaferrifranco costeffectivenessanalysisofgeneticdiagnosticstrategiesforlynchsyndromeinitaly
AT decensiandrea costeffectivenessanalysisofgeneticdiagnosticstrategiesforlynchsyndromeinitaly
AT federiciantonio costeffectivenessanalysisofgeneticdiagnosticstrategiesforlynchsyndromeinitaly
AT villaripaolo costeffectivenessanalysisofgeneticdiagnosticstrategiesforlynchsyndromeinitaly
AT genuardimaurizio costeffectivenessanalysisofgeneticdiagnosticstrategiesforlynchsyndromeinitaly
AT ricciardiwalter costeffectivenessanalysisofgeneticdiagnosticstrategiesforlynchsyndromeinitaly
AT bocciastefania costeffectivenessanalysisofgeneticdiagnosticstrategiesforlynchsyndromeinitaly