Cargando…
Cost-effectiveness analysis of genetic diagnostic strategies for Lynch syndrome in Italy
Lynch syndrome (LS) is an autosomal dominant condition caused by pathogenic variants in mismatch repair (MMR) genes that predispose individuals to different malignancies, such as colorectal cancer (CRC) and endometrial cancer. Current guidelines recommended testing for LS in individuals with newly d...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7329085/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32609729 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0235038 |
_version_ | 1783552846450393088 |
---|---|
author | Pastorino, Roberta Basile, Michele Tognetto, Alessia Di Marco, Marco Grossi, Adriano Lucci-Cordisco, Emanuela Scaldaferri, Franco De Censi, Andrea Federici, Antonio Villari, Paolo Genuardi, Maurizio Ricciardi, Walter Boccia, Stefania |
author_facet | Pastorino, Roberta Basile, Michele Tognetto, Alessia Di Marco, Marco Grossi, Adriano Lucci-Cordisco, Emanuela Scaldaferri, Franco De Censi, Andrea Federici, Antonio Villari, Paolo Genuardi, Maurizio Ricciardi, Walter Boccia, Stefania |
author_sort | Pastorino, Roberta |
collection | PubMed |
description | Lynch syndrome (LS) is an autosomal dominant condition caused by pathogenic variants in mismatch repair (MMR) genes that predispose individuals to different malignancies, such as colorectal cancer (CRC) and endometrial cancer. Current guidelines recommended testing for LS in individuals with newly diagnosed CRC to reduce cancer morbidity and mortality in relatives. Economic evaluations in support of such approach, however, are not available in Italy. We developed a decision-analytic model to analyze the cost-effectiveness of LS screening from the perspective of the Italian National Health System. Three testing strategies: the sequencing of all MMR genes without prior tumor analysis (Strategy 1), a sequential IHC and MS-MLPA analysis (Strategy 2), and an age-targeted strategy with a revised Bethesda criteria assessment before IHC and methylation-specific MLPA for patients ≥ than 70 years old (Strategy 3) were analyzed and compared to the “no testing” strategy. Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) in relatives after colonoscopy, aspirin prophylaxis and an intensive gynecological surveillance were estimated through a Markov model. Assuming a CRC incidence rate of 0.09% and a share of patients affected by LS equal to 2.81%, the number of detected pathogenic variants among CRC cases ranges, in a given year, between 910 and 1167 depending on the testing strategy employed. The testing strategies investigated, provided one-time to the entire eligible population (CRC patients), were associated with an overall cost ranging between €1,753,059.93-€10,388,000.00. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of the Markov model ranged from €941.24 /QALY to €1,681.93 /QALY, thus supporting that “universal testing” versus “no testing” is cost-effective, but not necessarily in comparison with age-targeted strategies. This is the first economic evaluation on different testing strategies for LS in Italy. The results might support the introduction of cost-effective recommendations for LS screening in Italy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7329085 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73290852020-07-14 Cost-effectiveness analysis of genetic diagnostic strategies for Lynch syndrome in Italy Pastorino, Roberta Basile, Michele Tognetto, Alessia Di Marco, Marco Grossi, Adriano Lucci-Cordisco, Emanuela Scaldaferri, Franco De Censi, Andrea Federici, Antonio Villari, Paolo Genuardi, Maurizio Ricciardi, Walter Boccia, Stefania PLoS One Research Article Lynch syndrome (LS) is an autosomal dominant condition caused by pathogenic variants in mismatch repair (MMR) genes that predispose individuals to different malignancies, such as colorectal cancer (CRC) and endometrial cancer. Current guidelines recommended testing for LS in individuals with newly diagnosed CRC to reduce cancer morbidity and mortality in relatives. Economic evaluations in support of such approach, however, are not available in Italy. We developed a decision-analytic model to analyze the cost-effectiveness of LS screening from the perspective of the Italian National Health System. Three testing strategies: the sequencing of all MMR genes without prior tumor analysis (Strategy 1), a sequential IHC and MS-MLPA analysis (Strategy 2), and an age-targeted strategy with a revised Bethesda criteria assessment before IHC and methylation-specific MLPA for patients ≥ than 70 years old (Strategy 3) were analyzed and compared to the “no testing” strategy. Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) in relatives after colonoscopy, aspirin prophylaxis and an intensive gynecological surveillance were estimated through a Markov model. Assuming a CRC incidence rate of 0.09% and a share of patients affected by LS equal to 2.81%, the number of detected pathogenic variants among CRC cases ranges, in a given year, between 910 and 1167 depending on the testing strategy employed. The testing strategies investigated, provided one-time to the entire eligible population (CRC patients), were associated with an overall cost ranging between €1,753,059.93-€10,388,000.00. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of the Markov model ranged from €941.24 /QALY to €1,681.93 /QALY, thus supporting that “universal testing” versus “no testing” is cost-effective, but not necessarily in comparison with age-targeted strategies. This is the first economic evaluation on different testing strategies for LS in Italy. The results might support the introduction of cost-effective recommendations for LS screening in Italy. Public Library of Science 2020-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7329085/ /pubmed/32609729 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0235038 Text en © 2020 Pastorino et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Pastorino, Roberta Basile, Michele Tognetto, Alessia Di Marco, Marco Grossi, Adriano Lucci-Cordisco, Emanuela Scaldaferri, Franco De Censi, Andrea Federici, Antonio Villari, Paolo Genuardi, Maurizio Ricciardi, Walter Boccia, Stefania Cost-effectiveness analysis of genetic diagnostic strategies for Lynch syndrome in Italy |
title | Cost-effectiveness analysis of genetic diagnostic strategies for Lynch syndrome in Italy |
title_full | Cost-effectiveness analysis of genetic diagnostic strategies for Lynch syndrome in Italy |
title_fullStr | Cost-effectiveness analysis of genetic diagnostic strategies for Lynch syndrome in Italy |
title_full_unstemmed | Cost-effectiveness analysis of genetic diagnostic strategies for Lynch syndrome in Italy |
title_short | Cost-effectiveness analysis of genetic diagnostic strategies for Lynch syndrome in Italy |
title_sort | cost-effectiveness analysis of genetic diagnostic strategies for lynch syndrome in italy |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7329085/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32609729 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0235038 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pastorinoroberta costeffectivenessanalysisofgeneticdiagnosticstrategiesforlynchsyndromeinitaly AT basilemichele costeffectivenessanalysisofgeneticdiagnosticstrategiesforlynchsyndromeinitaly AT tognettoalessia costeffectivenessanalysisofgeneticdiagnosticstrategiesforlynchsyndromeinitaly AT dimarcomarco costeffectivenessanalysisofgeneticdiagnosticstrategiesforlynchsyndromeinitaly AT grossiadriano costeffectivenessanalysisofgeneticdiagnosticstrategiesforlynchsyndromeinitaly AT luccicordiscoemanuela costeffectivenessanalysisofgeneticdiagnosticstrategiesforlynchsyndromeinitaly AT scaldaferrifranco costeffectivenessanalysisofgeneticdiagnosticstrategiesforlynchsyndromeinitaly AT decensiandrea costeffectivenessanalysisofgeneticdiagnosticstrategiesforlynchsyndromeinitaly AT federiciantonio costeffectivenessanalysisofgeneticdiagnosticstrategiesforlynchsyndromeinitaly AT villaripaolo costeffectivenessanalysisofgeneticdiagnosticstrategiesforlynchsyndromeinitaly AT genuardimaurizio costeffectivenessanalysisofgeneticdiagnosticstrategiesforlynchsyndromeinitaly AT ricciardiwalter costeffectivenessanalysisofgeneticdiagnosticstrategiesforlynchsyndromeinitaly AT bocciastefania costeffectivenessanalysisofgeneticdiagnosticstrategiesforlynchsyndromeinitaly |