Cargando…
Follow-up schedule for initial recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after ablation based on risk classification
BACKGROUND: To date, no standard follow-up guidelines exist regarding patients receiving ablation for initial recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We aimed to explore whether intensive follow-up could benefit these patients. METHODS: We reviewed the clinical data of patients who received comple...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7329485/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32611383 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40644-020-00319-w |
_version_ | 1783552914714787840 |
---|---|
author | Sun, Xuqi Li, Lingling Lyu, Ning Mu, Luwen Lai, Jinfa Zhao, Ming |
author_facet | Sun, Xuqi Li, Lingling Lyu, Ning Mu, Luwen Lai, Jinfa Zhao, Ming |
author_sort | Sun, Xuqi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To date, no standard follow-up guidelines exist regarding patients receiving ablation for initial recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We aimed to explore whether intensive follow-up could benefit these patients. METHODS: We reviewed the clinical data of patients who received complete ablation for initial HCC recurrence after curative treatments in our institution from January 2005 to June 2017. Risk factors for second recurrence of HCC were identified by univariate and multivariate analyses. Patients were classified into low- and high-risk groups according to the outcome of the classification and regression model. The patients were further categorized into short- (< 3 months) and long-interval (3–6 months) follow-up subgroups based on their surveillance in the first 2 years after complete ablation for initial recurrence. The Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank test was performed to compare the overall survival (OS) based on follow-up intervals in each risk group. We also validated our results by stratifying patients into subgroups with different numbers of risk factors and comparing the OS between patients with different follow-up intervals. RESULTS: A total of 361 patients were enrolled. The risk factors for secondary recurrence included the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage at initial recurrence and first recurrence-free survival after curative treatments for primary HCC (p < 0.001 and p = 0.002). Two risk groups (low and high) were identified. In both the low- and high-risk groups, the OS of patients was not associated with intervals of follow-up (p = 0.29 and 0.49). No significant difference was found in the rates of BCLC 0/A stage, tumor location or curative treatments for the second recurrence by different follow-up intervals in each risk group (p = 0.34 and 0.87; p = 0.69 and 0.97). The same tendency was found in subgroups with 0/1/2 risk factors for secondary recurrence during validation. CONCLUSION: The long-interval follow-up did not compromise the survival of patients with complete ablation for initial recurrent HCC. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7329485 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73294852020-07-02 Follow-up schedule for initial recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after ablation based on risk classification Sun, Xuqi Li, Lingling Lyu, Ning Mu, Luwen Lai, Jinfa Zhao, Ming Cancer Imaging Research Article BACKGROUND: To date, no standard follow-up guidelines exist regarding patients receiving ablation for initial recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We aimed to explore whether intensive follow-up could benefit these patients. METHODS: We reviewed the clinical data of patients who received complete ablation for initial HCC recurrence after curative treatments in our institution from January 2005 to June 2017. Risk factors for second recurrence of HCC were identified by univariate and multivariate analyses. Patients were classified into low- and high-risk groups according to the outcome of the classification and regression model. The patients were further categorized into short- (< 3 months) and long-interval (3–6 months) follow-up subgroups based on their surveillance in the first 2 years after complete ablation for initial recurrence. The Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank test was performed to compare the overall survival (OS) based on follow-up intervals in each risk group. We also validated our results by stratifying patients into subgroups with different numbers of risk factors and comparing the OS between patients with different follow-up intervals. RESULTS: A total of 361 patients were enrolled. The risk factors for secondary recurrence included the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage at initial recurrence and first recurrence-free survival after curative treatments for primary HCC (p < 0.001 and p = 0.002). Two risk groups (low and high) were identified. In both the low- and high-risk groups, the OS of patients was not associated with intervals of follow-up (p = 0.29 and 0.49). No significant difference was found in the rates of BCLC 0/A stage, tumor location or curative treatments for the second recurrence by different follow-up intervals in each risk group (p = 0.34 and 0.87; p = 0.69 and 0.97). The same tendency was found in subgroups with 0/1/2 risk factors for secondary recurrence during validation. CONCLUSION: The long-interval follow-up did not compromise the survival of patients with complete ablation for initial recurrent HCC. BioMed Central 2020-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7329485/ /pubmed/32611383 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40644-020-00319-w Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Sun, Xuqi Li, Lingling Lyu, Ning Mu, Luwen Lai, Jinfa Zhao, Ming Follow-up schedule for initial recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after ablation based on risk classification |
title | Follow-up schedule for initial recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after ablation based on risk classification |
title_full | Follow-up schedule for initial recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after ablation based on risk classification |
title_fullStr | Follow-up schedule for initial recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after ablation based on risk classification |
title_full_unstemmed | Follow-up schedule for initial recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after ablation based on risk classification |
title_short | Follow-up schedule for initial recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after ablation based on risk classification |
title_sort | follow-up schedule for initial recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after ablation based on risk classification |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7329485/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32611383 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40644-020-00319-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sunxuqi followupscheduleforinitialrecurrenthepatocellularcarcinomaafterablationbasedonriskclassification AT lilingling followupscheduleforinitialrecurrenthepatocellularcarcinomaafterablationbasedonriskclassification AT lyuning followupscheduleforinitialrecurrenthepatocellularcarcinomaafterablationbasedonriskclassification AT muluwen followupscheduleforinitialrecurrenthepatocellularcarcinomaafterablationbasedonriskclassification AT laijinfa followupscheduleforinitialrecurrenthepatocellularcarcinomaafterablationbasedonriskclassification AT zhaoming followupscheduleforinitialrecurrenthepatocellularcarcinomaafterablationbasedonriskclassification |