Cargando…

Patient perspectives on interventional pain management: thematic analysis of a qualitative interview study

BACKGROUND: Chronic pain is a widespread problem that is usually approached by focusing on its psychological aspects or on trying to reduce the pain from the pain generator. Patients report that they feel responsible for their pain and that they are disempowered and stigmatized because of it. Here,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hambraeus, Johan, Hambraeus, Kjerstin S., Sahlen, Klas-Göran
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7329503/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32611397
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05452-7
_version_ 1783552918719299584
author Hambraeus, Johan
Hambraeus, Kjerstin S.
Sahlen, Klas-Göran
author_facet Hambraeus, Johan
Hambraeus, Kjerstin S.
Sahlen, Klas-Göran
author_sort Hambraeus, Johan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Chronic pain is a widespread problem that is usually approached by focusing on its psychological aspects or on trying to reduce the pain from the pain generator. Patients report that they feel responsible for their pain and that they are disempowered and stigmatized because of it. Here, we explored interventional pain management from the patient’s perspective to understand the process better. METHODS: A purposive sample of 19 subjects was interviewed by an independent interviewer. The interviews were transcribed into text and thematic analysis was performed. RESULTS: The subjects’ perceptions covered three key themes: themselves as objects; the caregivers, including the process of tests and retests, the encounters and interactions with professionals, and the availability of the caregivers; and finally the outcomes, including the results of the tests and treatments and how these inspired them to think of other people with pain. Linking these themes, the subjects reported something best described as “gained empowerment” during interventional pain management; they were feeling heard and seen, they gained knowledge that helped them understand their problem better, they could ask questions and receive answers, and they felt safe and listened to. CONCLUSIONS: Many of the themes evolved in relation to the subjects’ contact with the healthcare services they received, but when the themes were merged and structured into the model, a cohesive pattern of empowerment appeared. If empowerment is a major factor in the positive effects of interventional pain management, it is important to facilitate and not hinder empowerment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov 2013-04-24 (Protocol ID SE-Dnr-2012-446-31 M-3, ClinicalTrials ID NCT01838603).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7329503
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73295032020-07-02 Patient perspectives on interventional pain management: thematic analysis of a qualitative interview study Hambraeus, Johan Hambraeus, Kjerstin S. Sahlen, Klas-Göran BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Chronic pain is a widespread problem that is usually approached by focusing on its psychological aspects or on trying to reduce the pain from the pain generator. Patients report that they feel responsible for their pain and that they are disempowered and stigmatized because of it. Here, we explored interventional pain management from the patient’s perspective to understand the process better. METHODS: A purposive sample of 19 subjects was interviewed by an independent interviewer. The interviews were transcribed into text and thematic analysis was performed. RESULTS: The subjects’ perceptions covered three key themes: themselves as objects; the caregivers, including the process of tests and retests, the encounters and interactions with professionals, and the availability of the caregivers; and finally the outcomes, including the results of the tests and treatments and how these inspired them to think of other people with pain. Linking these themes, the subjects reported something best described as “gained empowerment” during interventional pain management; they were feeling heard and seen, they gained knowledge that helped them understand their problem better, they could ask questions and receive answers, and they felt safe and listened to. CONCLUSIONS: Many of the themes evolved in relation to the subjects’ contact with the healthcare services they received, but when the themes were merged and structured into the model, a cohesive pattern of empowerment appeared. If empowerment is a major factor in the positive effects of interventional pain management, it is important to facilitate and not hinder empowerment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov 2013-04-24 (Protocol ID SE-Dnr-2012-446-31 M-3, ClinicalTrials ID NCT01838603). BioMed Central 2020-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7329503/ /pubmed/32611397 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05452-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hambraeus, Johan
Hambraeus, Kjerstin S.
Sahlen, Klas-Göran
Patient perspectives on interventional pain management: thematic analysis of a qualitative interview study
title Patient perspectives on interventional pain management: thematic analysis of a qualitative interview study
title_full Patient perspectives on interventional pain management: thematic analysis of a qualitative interview study
title_fullStr Patient perspectives on interventional pain management: thematic analysis of a qualitative interview study
title_full_unstemmed Patient perspectives on interventional pain management: thematic analysis of a qualitative interview study
title_short Patient perspectives on interventional pain management: thematic analysis of a qualitative interview study
title_sort patient perspectives on interventional pain management: thematic analysis of a qualitative interview study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7329503/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32611397
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05452-7
work_keys_str_mv AT hambraeusjohan patientperspectivesoninterventionalpainmanagementthematicanalysisofaqualitativeinterviewstudy
AT hambraeuskjerstins patientperspectivesoninterventionalpainmanagementthematicanalysisofaqualitativeinterviewstudy
AT sahlenklasgoran patientperspectivesoninterventionalpainmanagementthematicanalysisofaqualitativeinterviewstudy