Cargando…

The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire is a usable way to address mental health at well-child visits in general practice - a qualitative study of feasibility

BACKGROUND: Mental health problems is frequent among children and psychopathology in early childhood seems to predict mental disorders in adulthood. All Danish children are offered seven free well-child visits at their General Practitioner (GP) during their first 5 years of life. GPs have a unique p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stokholm, Julie Ravneberg, Lykke, Kirsten
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7329505/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32611309
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-020-01156-3
_version_ 1783552919183818752
author Stokholm, Julie Ravneberg
Lykke, Kirsten
author_facet Stokholm, Julie Ravneberg
Lykke, Kirsten
author_sort Stokholm, Julie Ravneberg
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Mental health problems is frequent among children and psychopathology in early childhood seems to predict mental disorders in adulthood. All Danish children are offered seven free well-child visits at their General Practitioner (GP) during their first 5 years of life. GPs have a unique position to address mental health problems at the well-child visits, but they lack a systematic approach when assessing children’s mental health. The purpose of this study was to investigate if the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) is a usable way to address preschool children’s mental health in general practice. METHODS: A qualitative study of feasibility. Parents completed an online version of the SDQ at home. At the well-child visit, the GP used the SDQ results as a basis for a talk about the child’s mental health. Afterwards the author JS conducted semistructured interviews with both the parent and the GP over the phone. The interviews were descriptively analyzed using the Framework Approach. RESULTS: Five primary care centres with 22 general practitioners in both Copenhagen and Region Zealand participated. Twenty four parents completed the SDQ and were interviewed. Participating parents and GPs agreed, that the SDQ introduced mental health as a natural and important part of the well-child visit. Online access had clear advantages: time for reflection at home and preparation, plus a clear result summary for the GP. Some of the GPs were worried that the questionnaire would be too time consuming, and might compromise the individualistic style of general practice. Some parents were worried if children with minor problems would be diagnosed. CONCLUSIONS: The online SDQ was well-accepted and feasible in daily practice. Implementing the SDQ into the well-child visit could strengthen the focus on the child’s mental health. However, before the SDQ can be generally implemented a guideline on how to utilize it in the well-child visit is needed, as well as studies of efficacy in this setting. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not relevant.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7329505
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73295052020-07-02 The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire is a usable way to address mental health at well-child visits in general practice - a qualitative study of feasibility Stokholm, Julie Ravneberg Lykke, Kirsten BMC Fam Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: Mental health problems is frequent among children and psychopathology in early childhood seems to predict mental disorders in adulthood. All Danish children are offered seven free well-child visits at their General Practitioner (GP) during their first 5 years of life. GPs have a unique position to address mental health problems at the well-child visits, but they lack a systematic approach when assessing children’s mental health. The purpose of this study was to investigate if the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) is a usable way to address preschool children’s mental health in general practice. METHODS: A qualitative study of feasibility. Parents completed an online version of the SDQ at home. At the well-child visit, the GP used the SDQ results as a basis for a talk about the child’s mental health. Afterwards the author JS conducted semistructured interviews with both the parent and the GP over the phone. The interviews were descriptively analyzed using the Framework Approach. RESULTS: Five primary care centres with 22 general practitioners in both Copenhagen and Region Zealand participated. Twenty four parents completed the SDQ and were interviewed. Participating parents and GPs agreed, that the SDQ introduced mental health as a natural and important part of the well-child visit. Online access had clear advantages: time for reflection at home and preparation, plus a clear result summary for the GP. Some of the GPs were worried that the questionnaire would be too time consuming, and might compromise the individualistic style of general practice. Some parents were worried if children with minor problems would be diagnosed. CONCLUSIONS: The online SDQ was well-accepted and feasible in daily practice. Implementing the SDQ into the well-child visit could strengthen the focus on the child’s mental health. However, before the SDQ can be generally implemented a guideline on how to utilize it in the well-child visit is needed, as well as studies of efficacy in this setting. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not relevant. BioMed Central 2020-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7329505/ /pubmed/32611309 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-020-01156-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Stokholm, Julie Ravneberg
Lykke, Kirsten
The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire is a usable way to address mental health at well-child visits in general practice - a qualitative study of feasibility
title The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire is a usable way to address mental health at well-child visits in general practice - a qualitative study of feasibility
title_full The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire is a usable way to address mental health at well-child visits in general practice - a qualitative study of feasibility
title_fullStr The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire is a usable way to address mental health at well-child visits in general practice - a qualitative study of feasibility
title_full_unstemmed The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire is a usable way to address mental health at well-child visits in general practice - a qualitative study of feasibility
title_short The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire is a usable way to address mental health at well-child visits in general practice - a qualitative study of feasibility
title_sort strengths and difficulties questionnaire is a usable way to address mental health at well-child visits in general practice - a qualitative study of feasibility
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7329505/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32611309
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-020-01156-3
work_keys_str_mv AT stokholmjulieravneberg thestrengthsanddifficultiesquestionnaireisausablewaytoaddressmentalhealthatwellchildvisitsingeneralpracticeaqualitativestudyoffeasibility
AT lykkekirsten thestrengthsanddifficultiesquestionnaireisausablewaytoaddressmentalhealthatwellchildvisitsingeneralpracticeaqualitativestudyoffeasibility
AT stokholmjulieravneberg strengthsanddifficultiesquestionnaireisausablewaytoaddressmentalhealthatwellchildvisitsingeneralpracticeaqualitativestudyoffeasibility
AT lykkekirsten strengthsanddifficultiesquestionnaireisausablewaytoaddressmentalhealthatwellchildvisitsingeneralpracticeaqualitativestudyoffeasibility