Cargando…
A retrospective cohort investigation of seroprevalence of Marburg virus and ebolaviruses in two different ecological zones in Uganda
BACKGROUND: Uganda has experienced seven Ebola Virus Disease (EVD) outbreaks and four Marburg Virus Disease (MVD) outbreaks between 2000 and 2019. We investigated the seroprevalence and risk factors for Marburg virus and ebolaviruses in gold mining communities around Kitaka gold mine in Western Ugan...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7329513/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32611400 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-020-05187-0 |
_version_ | 1783552920837423104 |
---|---|
author | Nyakarahuka, Luke Schafer, Ilana J. Balinandi, Stephen Mulei, Sophia Tumusiime, Alex Kyondo, Jackson Knust, Barbara Lutwama, Julius Rollin, Pierre Nichol, Stuart Shoemaker, Trevor |
author_facet | Nyakarahuka, Luke Schafer, Ilana J. Balinandi, Stephen Mulei, Sophia Tumusiime, Alex Kyondo, Jackson Knust, Barbara Lutwama, Julius Rollin, Pierre Nichol, Stuart Shoemaker, Trevor |
author_sort | Nyakarahuka, Luke |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Uganda has experienced seven Ebola Virus Disease (EVD) outbreaks and four Marburg Virus Disease (MVD) outbreaks between 2000 and 2019. We investigated the seroprevalence and risk factors for Marburg virus and ebolaviruses in gold mining communities around Kitaka gold mine in Western Uganda and compared them to non-mining communities in Central Uganda. METHODS: A questionnaire was administered and human blood samples were collected from three exposure groups in Western Uganda (gold miners, household members of miners, non-miners living within 50 km of Kitaka mine). The unexposed controls group sampled was community members in Central Uganda far away from any gold mining activity which we considered as low-risk for filovirus infection. ELISA serology was used to analyse samples, detecting IgG antibodies against Marburg virus and ebolaviruses (filoviruses). Data were analysed in STATA software using risk ratios and odds ratios. RESULTS: Miners in western Uganda were 5.4 times more likely to be filovirus seropositive compared to the control group in central Uganda (RR = 5.4; 95% CI 1.5–19.7) whereas people living in high-risk areas in Ibanda and Kamwenge districts were 3.6 more likely to be seropositive compared to control group in Luweeero district (RR = 3.6; 95% CI 1.1–12.2). Among all participants, filovirus seropositivity was 2.6% (19/724) of which 2.3% (17/724) were reactive to Sudan virus only and 0.1% (1/724) to Marburg virus. One individual seropositive for Sudan virus also had IgG antibodies reactive to Bundibugyo virus. The risk factors for filovirus seropositivity identified included mining (AOR = 3.4; 95% CI 1.3–8.5), male sex (AOR = 3.1; 95% CI 1.01–9.5), going inside mines (AOR = 3.1; 95% CI 1.2–8.2), cleaning corpses (AOR = 3.1; 95% CI 1.04–9.1) and contact with suspect filovirus cases (AOR = 3.9, 95% CI 1.04–14.5). CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that filovirus outbreaks may go undetected in Uganda and people involved in artisan gold mining are more likely to be exposed to infection with either Marburg virus or ebolaviruses, likely due to increased risk of exposure to bats. This calls for active surveillance in known high-risk areas for early detection and response to prevent filovirus epidemics. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7329513 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73295132020-07-02 A retrospective cohort investigation of seroprevalence of Marburg virus and ebolaviruses in two different ecological zones in Uganda Nyakarahuka, Luke Schafer, Ilana J. Balinandi, Stephen Mulei, Sophia Tumusiime, Alex Kyondo, Jackson Knust, Barbara Lutwama, Julius Rollin, Pierre Nichol, Stuart Shoemaker, Trevor BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Uganda has experienced seven Ebola Virus Disease (EVD) outbreaks and four Marburg Virus Disease (MVD) outbreaks between 2000 and 2019. We investigated the seroprevalence and risk factors for Marburg virus and ebolaviruses in gold mining communities around Kitaka gold mine in Western Uganda and compared them to non-mining communities in Central Uganda. METHODS: A questionnaire was administered and human blood samples were collected from three exposure groups in Western Uganda (gold miners, household members of miners, non-miners living within 50 km of Kitaka mine). The unexposed controls group sampled was community members in Central Uganda far away from any gold mining activity which we considered as low-risk for filovirus infection. ELISA serology was used to analyse samples, detecting IgG antibodies against Marburg virus and ebolaviruses (filoviruses). Data were analysed in STATA software using risk ratios and odds ratios. RESULTS: Miners in western Uganda were 5.4 times more likely to be filovirus seropositive compared to the control group in central Uganda (RR = 5.4; 95% CI 1.5–19.7) whereas people living in high-risk areas in Ibanda and Kamwenge districts were 3.6 more likely to be seropositive compared to control group in Luweeero district (RR = 3.6; 95% CI 1.1–12.2). Among all participants, filovirus seropositivity was 2.6% (19/724) of which 2.3% (17/724) were reactive to Sudan virus only and 0.1% (1/724) to Marburg virus. One individual seropositive for Sudan virus also had IgG antibodies reactive to Bundibugyo virus. The risk factors for filovirus seropositivity identified included mining (AOR = 3.4; 95% CI 1.3–8.5), male sex (AOR = 3.1; 95% CI 1.01–9.5), going inside mines (AOR = 3.1; 95% CI 1.2–8.2), cleaning corpses (AOR = 3.1; 95% CI 1.04–9.1) and contact with suspect filovirus cases (AOR = 3.9, 95% CI 1.04–14.5). CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that filovirus outbreaks may go undetected in Uganda and people involved in artisan gold mining are more likely to be exposed to infection with either Marburg virus or ebolaviruses, likely due to increased risk of exposure to bats. This calls for active surveillance in known high-risk areas for early detection and response to prevent filovirus epidemics. BioMed Central 2020-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7329513/ /pubmed/32611400 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-020-05187-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Nyakarahuka, Luke Schafer, Ilana J. Balinandi, Stephen Mulei, Sophia Tumusiime, Alex Kyondo, Jackson Knust, Barbara Lutwama, Julius Rollin, Pierre Nichol, Stuart Shoemaker, Trevor A retrospective cohort investigation of seroprevalence of Marburg virus and ebolaviruses in two different ecological zones in Uganda |
title | A retrospective cohort investigation of seroprevalence of Marburg virus and ebolaviruses in two different ecological zones in Uganda |
title_full | A retrospective cohort investigation of seroprevalence of Marburg virus and ebolaviruses in two different ecological zones in Uganda |
title_fullStr | A retrospective cohort investigation of seroprevalence of Marburg virus and ebolaviruses in two different ecological zones in Uganda |
title_full_unstemmed | A retrospective cohort investigation of seroprevalence of Marburg virus and ebolaviruses in two different ecological zones in Uganda |
title_short | A retrospective cohort investigation of seroprevalence of Marburg virus and ebolaviruses in two different ecological zones in Uganda |
title_sort | retrospective cohort investigation of seroprevalence of marburg virus and ebolaviruses in two different ecological zones in uganda |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7329513/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32611400 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-020-05187-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nyakarahukaluke aretrospectivecohortinvestigationofseroprevalenceofmarburgvirusandebolavirusesintwodifferentecologicalzonesinuganda AT schaferilanaj aretrospectivecohortinvestigationofseroprevalenceofmarburgvirusandebolavirusesintwodifferentecologicalzonesinuganda AT balinandistephen aretrospectivecohortinvestigationofseroprevalenceofmarburgvirusandebolavirusesintwodifferentecologicalzonesinuganda AT muleisophia aretrospectivecohortinvestigationofseroprevalenceofmarburgvirusandebolavirusesintwodifferentecologicalzonesinuganda AT tumusiimealex aretrospectivecohortinvestigationofseroprevalenceofmarburgvirusandebolavirusesintwodifferentecologicalzonesinuganda AT kyondojackson aretrospectivecohortinvestigationofseroprevalenceofmarburgvirusandebolavirusesintwodifferentecologicalzonesinuganda AT knustbarbara aretrospectivecohortinvestigationofseroprevalenceofmarburgvirusandebolavirusesintwodifferentecologicalzonesinuganda AT lutwamajulius aretrospectivecohortinvestigationofseroprevalenceofmarburgvirusandebolavirusesintwodifferentecologicalzonesinuganda AT rollinpierre aretrospectivecohortinvestigationofseroprevalenceofmarburgvirusandebolavirusesintwodifferentecologicalzonesinuganda AT nicholstuart aretrospectivecohortinvestigationofseroprevalenceofmarburgvirusandebolavirusesintwodifferentecologicalzonesinuganda AT shoemakertrevor aretrospectivecohortinvestigationofseroprevalenceofmarburgvirusandebolavirusesintwodifferentecologicalzonesinuganda AT nyakarahukaluke retrospectivecohortinvestigationofseroprevalenceofmarburgvirusandebolavirusesintwodifferentecologicalzonesinuganda AT schaferilanaj retrospectivecohortinvestigationofseroprevalenceofmarburgvirusandebolavirusesintwodifferentecologicalzonesinuganda AT balinandistephen retrospectivecohortinvestigationofseroprevalenceofmarburgvirusandebolavirusesintwodifferentecologicalzonesinuganda AT muleisophia retrospectivecohortinvestigationofseroprevalenceofmarburgvirusandebolavirusesintwodifferentecologicalzonesinuganda AT tumusiimealex retrospectivecohortinvestigationofseroprevalenceofmarburgvirusandebolavirusesintwodifferentecologicalzonesinuganda AT kyondojackson retrospectivecohortinvestigationofseroprevalenceofmarburgvirusandebolavirusesintwodifferentecologicalzonesinuganda AT knustbarbara retrospectivecohortinvestigationofseroprevalenceofmarburgvirusandebolavirusesintwodifferentecologicalzonesinuganda AT lutwamajulius retrospectivecohortinvestigationofseroprevalenceofmarburgvirusandebolavirusesintwodifferentecologicalzonesinuganda AT rollinpierre retrospectivecohortinvestigationofseroprevalenceofmarburgvirusandebolavirusesintwodifferentecologicalzonesinuganda AT nicholstuart retrospectivecohortinvestigationofseroprevalenceofmarburgvirusandebolavirusesintwodifferentecologicalzonesinuganda AT shoemakertrevor retrospectivecohortinvestigationofseroprevalenceofmarburgvirusandebolavirusesintwodifferentecologicalzonesinuganda |