Cargando…
Establishing the efficacy of interventions to improve health literacy and health behaviours: a systematic review
BACKGROUND: The primary aim of this review was to establish whether health literacy interventions, in adults, are effective for improving health literacy. Two secondary aims assessed the impact of health literacy interventions on health behaviours and whether health literacy interventions have been...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7329558/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32605608 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-08991-0 |
_version_ | 1783552931091447808 |
---|---|
author | Walters, Ronie Leslie, Stephen J. Polson, Rob Cusack, Tara Gorely, Trish |
author_facet | Walters, Ronie Leslie, Stephen J. Polson, Rob Cusack, Tara Gorely, Trish |
author_sort | Walters, Ronie |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The primary aim of this review was to establish whether health literacy interventions, in adults, are effective for improving health literacy. Two secondary aims assessed the impact of health literacy interventions on health behaviours and whether health literacy interventions have been conducted in cardiovascular patients. METHODS: A systematic review (Prospero registration: CRD42018110772) with no start date running through until April 2020. Eligible studies were conducted in adults and included a pre/post measure of health literacy. Medline, Embase, Eric, PsychINFO, CINAHL, Psychology and Behavioural Science, HMIC, Web of Science, Scopus, Social Care Online, NHS Scotland Journals, Social Policy and Practice, and Global Health were searched. Two thousand one hundred twenty-seven papers were assessed, and 57 full text papers screened to give 22 unique datasets from 23 papers. Risk of bias was assessed regarding randomisation, allocation sequence concealment, blinding, incomplete outcome data, selective outcome reporting and other biases. Intervention reporting quality was assessed using the TIDieR checklist. RESULTS: Twenty-two studies were included reporting on 10,997 participants in nine countries. The majority of studies (14/22) were published in 2018 or later. Eight studies (n = 1268 participants) also reported on behavioural outcomes. Health literacy interventions resulted in improvements in at least some aspect of health literacy in 15/22 studies (n = 10,180 participants) and improved behavioural outcomes in 7/8 studies (n = 1209 participants). Only two studies were conducted with cardiovascular patients. All studies were at risk of bias with 18 judged as high risk. In addition, there was poor reporting of intervention content with little explication of the theoretical basis for the interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Health literacy interventions can improve health literacy and can also lead to changes in health behaviours. Health literacy interventions offer a way to improve outcomes for populations most at risk of health inequalities. Health literacy is a developing field with very few interventions using clear theoretical frameworks. Closer links between health literacy and behaviour change theories and frameworks could result in higher quality and more effective interventions. PROSPERO REGISTRATION: Prospero registration: CRD42018110772 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7329558 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73295582020-07-02 Establishing the efficacy of interventions to improve health literacy and health behaviours: a systematic review Walters, Ronie Leslie, Stephen J. Polson, Rob Cusack, Tara Gorely, Trish BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: The primary aim of this review was to establish whether health literacy interventions, in adults, are effective for improving health literacy. Two secondary aims assessed the impact of health literacy interventions on health behaviours and whether health literacy interventions have been conducted in cardiovascular patients. METHODS: A systematic review (Prospero registration: CRD42018110772) with no start date running through until April 2020. Eligible studies were conducted in adults and included a pre/post measure of health literacy. Medline, Embase, Eric, PsychINFO, CINAHL, Psychology and Behavioural Science, HMIC, Web of Science, Scopus, Social Care Online, NHS Scotland Journals, Social Policy and Practice, and Global Health were searched. Two thousand one hundred twenty-seven papers were assessed, and 57 full text papers screened to give 22 unique datasets from 23 papers. Risk of bias was assessed regarding randomisation, allocation sequence concealment, blinding, incomplete outcome data, selective outcome reporting and other biases. Intervention reporting quality was assessed using the TIDieR checklist. RESULTS: Twenty-two studies were included reporting on 10,997 participants in nine countries. The majority of studies (14/22) were published in 2018 or later. Eight studies (n = 1268 participants) also reported on behavioural outcomes. Health literacy interventions resulted in improvements in at least some aspect of health literacy in 15/22 studies (n = 10,180 participants) and improved behavioural outcomes in 7/8 studies (n = 1209 participants). Only two studies were conducted with cardiovascular patients. All studies were at risk of bias with 18 judged as high risk. In addition, there was poor reporting of intervention content with little explication of the theoretical basis for the interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Health literacy interventions can improve health literacy and can also lead to changes in health behaviours. Health literacy interventions offer a way to improve outcomes for populations most at risk of health inequalities. Health literacy is a developing field with very few interventions using clear theoretical frameworks. Closer links between health literacy and behaviour change theories and frameworks could result in higher quality and more effective interventions. PROSPERO REGISTRATION: Prospero registration: CRD42018110772 BioMed Central 2020-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7329558/ /pubmed/32605608 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-08991-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Walters, Ronie Leslie, Stephen J. Polson, Rob Cusack, Tara Gorely, Trish Establishing the efficacy of interventions to improve health literacy and health behaviours: a systematic review |
title | Establishing the efficacy of interventions to improve health literacy and health behaviours: a systematic review |
title_full | Establishing the efficacy of interventions to improve health literacy and health behaviours: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Establishing the efficacy of interventions to improve health literacy and health behaviours: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Establishing the efficacy of interventions to improve health literacy and health behaviours: a systematic review |
title_short | Establishing the efficacy of interventions to improve health literacy and health behaviours: a systematic review |
title_sort | establishing the efficacy of interventions to improve health literacy and health behaviours: a systematic review |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7329558/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32605608 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-08991-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT waltersronie establishingtheefficacyofinterventionstoimprovehealthliteracyandhealthbehavioursasystematicreview AT lesliestephenj establishingtheefficacyofinterventionstoimprovehealthliteracyandhealthbehavioursasystematicreview AT polsonrob establishingtheefficacyofinterventionstoimprovehealthliteracyandhealthbehavioursasystematicreview AT cusacktara establishingtheefficacyofinterventionstoimprovehealthliteracyandhealthbehavioursasystematicreview AT gorelytrish establishingtheefficacyofinterventionstoimprovehealthliteracyandhealthbehavioursasystematicreview |