Cargando…

Endothelial and Inflammation Biomarker Profiles at Diagnosis Reflecting Clinical Heterogeneity and Serving as a Prognostic Tool for Treatment Response in Two Independent Cohorts of Patients With Juvenile Dermatomyositis

OBJECTIVE: Juvenile dermatomyositis (DM) is a heterogeneous systemic immune‐mediated vasculopathy. This study was undertaken to 1) identify inflammation/endothelial dysfunction–related biomarker profiles reflecting disease severity at diagnosis, and 2) establish whether such biomarker profiles could...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wienke, Judith, Pachman, Lauren M., Morgan, Gabrielle A., Yeo, Joo Guan, Amoruso, Maria C., Hans, Victoria, Kamphuis, Sylvia S. M., Hoppenreijs, Esther P. A. H., Armbrust, Wineke, van den Berg, J. Merlijn, Hissink Muller, Petra C. E., Gelderman, Kyra A., Arkachaisri, Thaschawee, van Wijk, Femke, van Royen‐Kerkhof, Annet
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7329617/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32103637
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/art.41236
_version_ 1783552933864931328
author Wienke, Judith
Pachman, Lauren M.
Morgan, Gabrielle A.
Yeo, Joo Guan
Amoruso, Maria C.
Hans, Victoria
Kamphuis, Sylvia S. M.
Hoppenreijs, Esther P. A. H.
Armbrust, Wineke
van den Berg, J. Merlijn
Hissink Muller, Petra C. E.
Gelderman, Kyra A.
Arkachaisri, Thaschawee
van Wijk, Femke
van Royen‐Kerkhof, Annet
author_facet Wienke, Judith
Pachman, Lauren M.
Morgan, Gabrielle A.
Yeo, Joo Guan
Amoruso, Maria C.
Hans, Victoria
Kamphuis, Sylvia S. M.
Hoppenreijs, Esther P. A. H.
Armbrust, Wineke
van den Berg, J. Merlijn
Hissink Muller, Petra C. E.
Gelderman, Kyra A.
Arkachaisri, Thaschawee
van Wijk, Femke
van Royen‐Kerkhof, Annet
author_sort Wienke, Judith
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Juvenile dermatomyositis (DM) is a heterogeneous systemic immune‐mediated vasculopathy. This study was undertaken to 1) identify inflammation/endothelial dysfunction–related biomarker profiles reflecting disease severity at diagnosis, and 2) establish whether such biomarker profiles could be used for predicting the response to treatment in patients with juvenile DM. METHODS: In total, 39 biomarkers related to activation of endothelial cells, endothelial dysfunction, and inflammation were measured using multiplex technology in serum samples from treatment‐naive patients with juvenile DM from 2 independent cohorts (n = 30 and n = 29). Data were analyzed by unsupervised hierarchical clustering, nonparametric tests with correction for multiple comparisons, and Kaplan‐Meier tests with Cox proportional hazards models for analysis of treatment duration. Myositis‐specific antibodies (MSAs) were measured in the patients’ serum using line blot assays. RESULTS: Severe vasculopathy in patients with juvenile DM was associated with low serum levels of intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (Spearman's rho [r(s)] = 0.465, P = 0.0111) and high serum levels of endoglin (r(s) = −0.67, P < 0.0001). In the discovery cohort, unsupervised hierarchical clustering analysis of the biomarker profiles yielded 2 distinct patient clusters, of which the smaller cluster (cluster 1; n = 8) exhibited high serum levels of CXCL13, CCL19, galectin‐9, CXCL10, tumor necrosis factor receptor type II (TNFRII), and galectin‐1 (false discovery rate <0.0001), and this cluster had greater severity of muscle disease and global disease activity (each P < 0.05 versus cluster 2). In the validation cohort, correlations between the serum levels of galectin‐9, CXCL10, TNFRII, and galectin‐1 and the severity of global disease activity were confirmed (r(s) = 0.40–0.52, P < 0.05). Stratification of patients according to the 4 confirmed biomarkers identified a cluster of patients with severe symptoms (comprising 64.7% of patients) who were considered at high risk of requiring more intensive treatment in the first 3 months after diagnosis (P = 0.0437 versus other cluster). Moreover, high serum levels of galectin‐9, CXCL10, and TNFRII were predictive of a longer total treatment duration (P < 0.05). The biomarker‐based clusters were not evidently correlated with patients’ MSA serotypes. CONCLUSION: Results of this study confirm the heterogeneity of new‐onset juvenile DM based on serum biomarker profiles. Patients with high serum levels of galectin‐9, CXCL10, TNFRII, and galectin‐1 may respond suboptimally to conventional treatment, and may therefore benefit from more intensive monitoring and/or treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7329617
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73296172020-07-27 Endothelial and Inflammation Biomarker Profiles at Diagnosis Reflecting Clinical Heterogeneity and Serving as a Prognostic Tool for Treatment Response in Two Independent Cohorts of Patients With Juvenile Dermatomyositis Wienke, Judith Pachman, Lauren M. Morgan, Gabrielle A. Yeo, Joo Guan Amoruso, Maria C. Hans, Victoria Kamphuis, Sylvia S. M. Hoppenreijs, Esther P. A. H. Armbrust, Wineke van den Berg, J. Merlijn Hissink Muller, Petra C. E. Gelderman, Kyra A. Arkachaisri, Thaschawee van Wijk, Femke van Royen‐Kerkhof, Annet Arthritis Rheumatol Pediatric Rheumatology OBJECTIVE: Juvenile dermatomyositis (DM) is a heterogeneous systemic immune‐mediated vasculopathy. This study was undertaken to 1) identify inflammation/endothelial dysfunction–related biomarker profiles reflecting disease severity at diagnosis, and 2) establish whether such biomarker profiles could be used for predicting the response to treatment in patients with juvenile DM. METHODS: In total, 39 biomarkers related to activation of endothelial cells, endothelial dysfunction, and inflammation were measured using multiplex technology in serum samples from treatment‐naive patients with juvenile DM from 2 independent cohorts (n = 30 and n = 29). Data were analyzed by unsupervised hierarchical clustering, nonparametric tests with correction for multiple comparisons, and Kaplan‐Meier tests with Cox proportional hazards models for analysis of treatment duration. Myositis‐specific antibodies (MSAs) were measured in the patients’ serum using line blot assays. RESULTS: Severe vasculopathy in patients with juvenile DM was associated with low serum levels of intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (Spearman's rho [r(s)] = 0.465, P = 0.0111) and high serum levels of endoglin (r(s) = −0.67, P < 0.0001). In the discovery cohort, unsupervised hierarchical clustering analysis of the biomarker profiles yielded 2 distinct patient clusters, of which the smaller cluster (cluster 1; n = 8) exhibited high serum levels of CXCL13, CCL19, galectin‐9, CXCL10, tumor necrosis factor receptor type II (TNFRII), and galectin‐1 (false discovery rate <0.0001), and this cluster had greater severity of muscle disease and global disease activity (each P < 0.05 versus cluster 2). In the validation cohort, correlations between the serum levels of galectin‐9, CXCL10, TNFRII, and galectin‐1 and the severity of global disease activity were confirmed (r(s) = 0.40–0.52, P < 0.05). Stratification of patients according to the 4 confirmed biomarkers identified a cluster of patients with severe symptoms (comprising 64.7% of patients) who were considered at high risk of requiring more intensive treatment in the first 3 months after diagnosis (P = 0.0437 versus other cluster). Moreover, high serum levels of galectin‐9, CXCL10, and TNFRII were predictive of a longer total treatment duration (P < 0.05). The biomarker‐based clusters were not evidently correlated with patients’ MSA serotypes. CONCLUSION: Results of this study confirm the heterogeneity of new‐onset juvenile DM based on serum biomarker profiles. Patients with high serum levels of galectin‐9, CXCL10, TNFRII, and galectin‐1 may respond suboptimally to conventional treatment, and may therefore benefit from more intensive monitoring and/or treatment. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-05-29 2020-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7329617/ /pubmed/32103637 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/art.41236 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Arthritis & Rheumatology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American College of Rheumatology. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Pediatric Rheumatology
Wienke, Judith
Pachman, Lauren M.
Morgan, Gabrielle A.
Yeo, Joo Guan
Amoruso, Maria C.
Hans, Victoria
Kamphuis, Sylvia S. M.
Hoppenreijs, Esther P. A. H.
Armbrust, Wineke
van den Berg, J. Merlijn
Hissink Muller, Petra C. E.
Gelderman, Kyra A.
Arkachaisri, Thaschawee
van Wijk, Femke
van Royen‐Kerkhof, Annet
Endothelial and Inflammation Biomarker Profiles at Diagnosis Reflecting Clinical Heterogeneity and Serving as a Prognostic Tool for Treatment Response in Two Independent Cohorts of Patients With Juvenile Dermatomyositis
title Endothelial and Inflammation Biomarker Profiles at Diagnosis Reflecting Clinical Heterogeneity and Serving as a Prognostic Tool for Treatment Response in Two Independent Cohorts of Patients With Juvenile Dermatomyositis
title_full Endothelial and Inflammation Biomarker Profiles at Diagnosis Reflecting Clinical Heterogeneity and Serving as a Prognostic Tool for Treatment Response in Two Independent Cohorts of Patients With Juvenile Dermatomyositis
title_fullStr Endothelial and Inflammation Biomarker Profiles at Diagnosis Reflecting Clinical Heterogeneity and Serving as a Prognostic Tool for Treatment Response in Two Independent Cohorts of Patients With Juvenile Dermatomyositis
title_full_unstemmed Endothelial and Inflammation Biomarker Profiles at Diagnosis Reflecting Clinical Heterogeneity and Serving as a Prognostic Tool for Treatment Response in Two Independent Cohorts of Patients With Juvenile Dermatomyositis
title_short Endothelial and Inflammation Biomarker Profiles at Diagnosis Reflecting Clinical Heterogeneity and Serving as a Prognostic Tool for Treatment Response in Two Independent Cohorts of Patients With Juvenile Dermatomyositis
title_sort endothelial and inflammation biomarker profiles at diagnosis reflecting clinical heterogeneity and serving as a prognostic tool for treatment response in two independent cohorts of patients with juvenile dermatomyositis
topic Pediatric Rheumatology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7329617/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32103637
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/art.41236
work_keys_str_mv AT wienkejudith endothelialandinflammationbiomarkerprofilesatdiagnosisreflectingclinicalheterogeneityandservingasaprognostictoolfortreatmentresponseintwoindependentcohortsofpatientswithjuveniledermatomyositis
AT pachmanlaurenm endothelialandinflammationbiomarkerprofilesatdiagnosisreflectingclinicalheterogeneityandservingasaprognostictoolfortreatmentresponseintwoindependentcohortsofpatientswithjuveniledermatomyositis
AT morgangabriellea endothelialandinflammationbiomarkerprofilesatdiagnosisreflectingclinicalheterogeneityandservingasaprognostictoolfortreatmentresponseintwoindependentcohortsofpatientswithjuveniledermatomyositis
AT yeojooguan endothelialandinflammationbiomarkerprofilesatdiagnosisreflectingclinicalheterogeneityandservingasaprognostictoolfortreatmentresponseintwoindependentcohortsofpatientswithjuveniledermatomyositis
AT amorusomariac endothelialandinflammationbiomarkerprofilesatdiagnosisreflectingclinicalheterogeneityandservingasaprognostictoolfortreatmentresponseintwoindependentcohortsofpatientswithjuveniledermatomyositis
AT hansvictoria endothelialandinflammationbiomarkerprofilesatdiagnosisreflectingclinicalheterogeneityandservingasaprognostictoolfortreatmentresponseintwoindependentcohortsofpatientswithjuveniledermatomyositis
AT kamphuissylviasm endothelialandinflammationbiomarkerprofilesatdiagnosisreflectingclinicalheterogeneityandservingasaprognostictoolfortreatmentresponseintwoindependentcohortsofpatientswithjuveniledermatomyositis
AT hoppenreijsestherpah endothelialandinflammationbiomarkerprofilesatdiagnosisreflectingclinicalheterogeneityandservingasaprognostictoolfortreatmentresponseintwoindependentcohortsofpatientswithjuveniledermatomyositis
AT armbrustwineke endothelialandinflammationbiomarkerprofilesatdiagnosisreflectingclinicalheterogeneityandservingasaprognostictoolfortreatmentresponseintwoindependentcohortsofpatientswithjuveniledermatomyositis
AT vandenbergjmerlijn endothelialandinflammationbiomarkerprofilesatdiagnosisreflectingclinicalheterogeneityandservingasaprognostictoolfortreatmentresponseintwoindependentcohortsofpatientswithjuveniledermatomyositis
AT hissinkmullerpetrace endothelialandinflammationbiomarkerprofilesatdiagnosisreflectingclinicalheterogeneityandservingasaprognostictoolfortreatmentresponseintwoindependentcohortsofpatientswithjuveniledermatomyositis
AT geldermankyraa endothelialandinflammationbiomarkerprofilesatdiagnosisreflectingclinicalheterogeneityandservingasaprognostictoolfortreatmentresponseintwoindependentcohortsofpatientswithjuveniledermatomyositis
AT arkachaisrithaschawee endothelialandinflammationbiomarkerprofilesatdiagnosisreflectingclinicalheterogeneityandservingasaprognostictoolfortreatmentresponseintwoindependentcohortsofpatientswithjuveniledermatomyositis
AT vanwijkfemke endothelialandinflammationbiomarkerprofilesatdiagnosisreflectingclinicalheterogeneityandservingasaprognostictoolfortreatmentresponseintwoindependentcohortsofpatientswithjuveniledermatomyositis
AT vanroyenkerkhofannet endothelialandinflammationbiomarkerprofilesatdiagnosisreflectingclinicalheterogeneityandservingasaprognostictoolfortreatmentresponseintwoindependentcohortsofpatientswithjuveniledermatomyositis