Cargando…

Prediction of pathologic upgrading in Gleason score 3+4 prostate cancer: Who is a candidate for active surveillance?

PURPOSE: Whether active surveillance (AS) can be safely extended to patients with Gleason score (GS) 3+4 prostate cancer is highly debated. We examined the incidence and predictors of upgrading among patients with GS 3+4 disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study involved 377 patients with biopsy GS...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pham, Duc Minh, Kim, Jung Kwon, Lee, Sangchul, Hong, Sung Kyu, Byun, Seok-Soo, Lee, Sang Eun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Urological Association 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7329648/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32665997
http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/icu.2020.61.4.405
_version_ 1783552940289556480
author Pham, Duc Minh
Kim, Jung Kwon
Lee, Sangchul
Hong, Sung Kyu
Byun, Seok-Soo
Lee, Sang Eun
author_facet Pham, Duc Minh
Kim, Jung Kwon
Lee, Sangchul
Hong, Sung Kyu
Byun, Seok-Soo
Lee, Sang Eun
author_sort Pham, Duc Minh
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Whether active surveillance (AS) can be safely extended to patients with Gleason score (GS) 3+4 prostate cancer is highly debated. We examined the incidence and predictors of upgrading among patients with GS 3+4 disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study involved 377 patients with biopsy GS 3+4 who underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RP) from 2014 to 2018 at a single institution. We analyzed the rate of GS upgrading and used logistic regression to determine the predictors of upgrading. RESULTS: A total of 168 (44.6%) patients with GS 3+4 experienced an upgrade in GS. In multivariable analysis, advanced age, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, PSA density (PSAD) and Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System version 2 (PI-RADS v2) score were significant predictors of GS upgrading. When structured into a predictive model that included age ≥65 years, PSA ≥7.7 ng/mL, PSAD ≥0.475 ng/mL(2) and PI-RADS v2 score 4–5, the probability of GS upgrading ranged from 36.4% to 65.7% when one to four of these factors were included. CONCLUSIONS: A substantial proportion of patients with GS 3+4 prostate cancer were upgraded after RP. However, according to our model combining clinical and imaging predictors, patients with a low risk of GS upgrading may be eligible candidates for AS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7329648
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher The Korean Urological Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73296482020-07-13 Prediction of pathologic upgrading in Gleason score 3+4 prostate cancer: Who is a candidate for active surveillance? Pham, Duc Minh Kim, Jung Kwon Lee, Sangchul Hong, Sung Kyu Byun, Seok-Soo Lee, Sang Eun Investig Clin Urol Original Article PURPOSE: Whether active surveillance (AS) can be safely extended to patients with Gleason score (GS) 3+4 prostate cancer is highly debated. We examined the incidence and predictors of upgrading among patients with GS 3+4 disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study involved 377 patients with biopsy GS 3+4 who underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RP) from 2014 to 2018 at a single institution. We analyzed the rate of GS upgrading and used logistic regression to determine the predictors of upgrading. RESULTS: A total of 168 (44.6%) patients with GS 3+4 experienced an upgrade in GS. In multivariable analysis, advanced age, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, PSA density (PSAD) and Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System version 2 (PI-RADS v2) score were significant predictors of GS upgrading. When structured into a predictive model that included age ≥65 years, PSA ≥7.7 ng/mL, PSAD ≥0.475 ng/mL(2) and PI-RADS v2 score 4–5, the probability of GS upgrading ranged from 36.4% to 65.7% when one to four of these factors were included. CONCLUSIONS: A substantial proportion of patients with GS 3+4 prostate cancer were upgraded after RP. However, according to our model combining clinical and imaging predictors, patients with a low risk of GS upgrading may be eligible candidates for AS. The Korean Urological Association 2020-07 2020-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7329648/ /pubmed/32665997 http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/icu.2020.61.4.405 Text en © The Korean Urological Association, 2020 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Pham, Duc Minh
Kim, Jung Kwon
Lee, Sangchul
Hong, Sung Kyu
Byun, Seok-Soo
Lee, Sang Eun
Prediction of pathologic upgrading in Gleason score 3+4 prostate cancer: Who is a candidate for active surveillance?
title Prediction of pathologic upgrading in Gleason score 3+4 prostate cancer: Who is a candidate for active surveillance?
title_full Prediction of pathologic upgrading in Gleason score 3+4 prostate cancer: Who is a candidate for active surveillance?
title_fullStr Prediction of pathologic upgrading in Gleason score 3+4 prostate cancer: Who is a candidate for active surveillance?
title_full_unstemmed Prediction of pathologic upgrading in Gleason score 3+4 prostate cancer: Who is a candidate for active surveillance?
title_short Prediction of pathologic upgrading in Gleason score 3+4 prostate cancer: Who is a candidate for active surveillance?
title_sort prediction of pathologic upgrading in gleason score 3+4 prostate cancer: who is a candidate for active surveillance?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7329648/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32665997
http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/icu.2020.61.4.405
work_keys_str_mv AT phamducminh predictionofpathologicupgradingingleasonscore34prostatecancerwhoisacandidateforactivesurveillance
AT kimjungkwon predictionofpathologicupgradingingleasonscore34prostatecancerwhoisacandidateforactivesurveillance
AT leesangchul predictionofpathologicupgradingingleasonscore34prostatecancerwhoisacandidateforactivesurveillance
AT hongsungkyu predictionofpathologicupgradingingleasonscore34prostatecancerwhoisacandidateforactivesurveillance
AT byunseoksoo predictionofpathologicupgradingingleasonscore34prostatecancerwhoisacandidateforactivesurveillance
AT leesangeun predictionofpathologicupgradingingleasonscore34prostatecancerwhoisacandidateforactivesurveillance