Cargando…

Evaluation of enhanced recovery after surgery program components implemented in laparoscopic appendectomy: prospective randomized clinical study

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) is a widely used surgical procedure. Patients often suffer from considerable postoperative pain and indigestion, which prolongs their in-hospital stay. Almost 10% of patients develop postoperative complications. The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nechay, Taras, Sazhin, Alexander, Titkova, Svetlana, Tyagunov, Alexander, Anurov, Mikhail, Melnikov-Makarchuk, Kirill, Tyagunov, Anton
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7329822/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32612104
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-67591-5
_version_ 1783552977826480128
author Nechay, Taras
Sazhin, Alexander
Titkova, Svetlana
Tyagunov, Alexander
Anurov, Mikhail
Melnikov-Makarchuk, Kirill
Tyagunov, Anton
author_facet Nechay, Taras
Sazhin, Alexander
Titkova, Svetlana
Tyagunov, Alexander
Anurov, Mikhail
Melnikov-Makarchuk, Kirill
Tyagunov, Anton
author_sort Nechay, Taras
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) is a widely used surgical procedure. Patients often suffer from considerable postoperative pain and indigestion, which prolongs their in-hospital stay. Almost 10% of patients develop postoperative complications. The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program has proven its efficacy in elective surgery and could hypothetically improve LA outcomes. Currently, there is no ERAS program for LA. METHODS: A modified ERAS (mERAS) protocol was studied in a prospective, randomized nonblinded clinical trial. The mERAS group consisted of 50 patients; the control group, of 54 patients. The mERAS protocol included a patient information brochure; minimizing drain use; local anesthesia; low-pressure pneumoperitoneum; early mobilization and oral diet. The primary outcome was postoperative length of stay (pLOS). RESULTS: Modified protocol reduced median pLOS to 1.25 days vs 2 days in the controls (p < 0.0001). Twenty-one (42%) mERAS patients and 4 (7.4%) controls were discharged within 24 h (p < 0.001) after surgery; 0 readmissions were reported. Postoperative pain intensity assessed on the visual analogue scale was significantly lower in the mERAS group [mERAS vs control 0 h, 2 h, 6 h, 12 h and 24 h after surgery: 2.33 ± 2.12 vs 4.19 ± 2.08 (p < 0.0001), 2.27 ± 1.91 vs 4.02 ± 1.89 (p < 0.0001), 2.28 ± 1.98 vs 3.70 ± 1.57 (p = 0.0001), 1.98 ± 1.72 vs 3.43 ± 1.54 (p < 0.0001) and 1.80 ± 1.74 vs 3.00 ± 1.27 (p = 0.032), respectively)]. The severity of shoulder and neck pain was lower but its incidence was similar. Peristalsis recovery was achieved earlier in the study group (median (min–max))—mERAS 7 (2–34) h vs control 11 (3–43) h; p = 0.009) but did not affect the time of the first flatus 23 (2–72) h vs 29 (6–70) h, respectively; p = 0.499). CONCLUSIONS: The modified ERAS program for LA has advantages over the traditional approach. REGISTRATION: This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT03754777 (27/11/2018).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7329822
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73298222020-07-06 Evaluation of enhanced recovery after surgery program components implemented in laparoscopic appendectomy: prospective randomized clinical study Nechay, Taras Sazhin, Alexander Titkova, Svetlana Tyagunov, Alexander Anurov, Mikhail Melnikov-Makarchuk, Kirill Tyagunov, Anton Sci Rep Article BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) is a widely used surgical procedure. Patients often suffer from considerable postoperative pain and indigestion, which prolongs their in-hospital stay. Almost 10% of patients develop postoperative complications. The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program has proven its efficacy in elective surgery and could hypothetically improve LA outcomes. Currently, there is no ERAS program for LA. METHODS: A modified ERAS (mERAS) protocol was studied in a prospective, randomized nonblinded clinical trial. The mERAS group consisted of 50 patients; the control group, of 54 patients. The mERAS protocol included a patient information brochure; minimizing drain use; local anesthesia; low-pressure pneumoperitoneum; early mobilization and oral diet. The primary outcome was postoperative length of stay (pLOS). RESULTS: Modified protocol reduced median pLOS to 1.25 days vs 2 days in the controls (p < 0.0001). Twenty-one (42%) mERAS patients and 4 (7.4%) controls were discharged within 24 h (p < 0.001) after surgery; 0 readmissions were reported. Postoperative pain intensity assessed on the visual analogue scale was significantly lower in the mERAS group [mERAS vs control 0 h, 2 h, 6 h, 12 h and 24 h after surgery: 2.33 ± 2.12 vs 4.19 ± 2.08 (p < 0.0001), 2.27 ± 1.91 vs 4.02 ± 1.89 (p < 0.0001), 2.28 ± 1.98 vs 3.70 ± 1.57 (p = 0.0001), 1.98 ± 1.72 vs 3.43 ± 1.54 (p < 0.0001) and 1.80 ± 1.74 vs 3.00 ± 1.27 (p = 0.032), respectively)]. The severity of shoulder and neck pain was lower but its incidence was similar. Peristalsis recovery was achieved earlier in the study group (median (min–max))—mERAS 7 (2–34) h vs control 11 (3–43) h; p = 0.009) but did not affect the time of the first flatus 23 (2–72) h vs 29 (6–70) h, respectively; p = 0.499). CONCLUSIONS: The modified ERAS program for LA has advantages over the traditional approach. REGISTRATION: This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT03754777 (27/11/2018). Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7329822/ /pubmed/32612104 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-67591-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2020, corrected publication 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Nechay, Taras
Sazhin, Alexander
Titkova, Svetlana
Tyagunov, Alexander
Anurov, Mikhail
Melnikov-Makarchuk, Kirill
Tyagunov, Anton
Evaluation of enhanced recovery after surgery program components implemented in laparoscopic appendectomy: prospective randomized clinical study
title Evaluation of enhanced recovery after surgery program components implemented in laparoscopic appendectomy: prospective randomized clinical study
title_full Evaluation of enhanced recovery after surgery program components implemented in laparoscopic appendectomy: prospective randomized clinical study
title_fullStr Evaluation of enhanced recovery after surgery program components implemented in laparoscopic appendectomy: prospective randomized clinical study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of enhanced recovery after surgery program components implemented in laparoscopic appendectomy: prospective randomized clinical study
title_short Evaluation of enhanced recovery after surgery program components implemented in laparoscopic appendectomy: prospective randomized clinical study
title_sort evaluation of enhanced recovery after surgery program components implemented in laparoscopic appendectomy: prospective randomized clinical study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7329822/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32612104
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-67591-5
work_keys_str_mv AT nechaytaras evaluationofenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprogramcomponentsimplementedinlaparoscopicappendectomyprospectiverandomizedclinicalstudy
AT sazhinalexander evaluationofenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprogramcomponentsimplementedinlaparoscopicappendectomyprospectiverandomizedclinicalstudy
AT titkovasvetlana evaluationofenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprogramcomponentsimplementedinlaparoscopicappendectomyprospectiverandomizedclinicalstudy
AT tyagunovalexander evaluationofenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprogramcomponentsimplementedinlaparoscopicappendectomyprospectiverandomizedclinicalstudy
AT anurovmikhail evaluationofenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprogramcomponentsimplementedinlaparoscopicappendectomyprospectiverandomizedclinicalstudy
AT melnikovmakarchukkirill evaluationofenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprogramcomponentsimplementedinlaparoscopicappendectomyprospectiverandomizedclinicalstudy
AT tyagunovanton evaluationofenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprogramcomponentsimplementedinlaparoscopicappendectomyprospectiverandomizedclinicalstudy