Cargando…

Should chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine be used to treat COVID-19? A rapid review

BACKGROUND: On the 11 March 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared that COVID-19 was a pandemic. To date, there are no medical treatments for COVID-19 with proven effectiveness. Novel treatments and/or vaccines will take time to be developed and distributed to patients. In light of this,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gbinigie, Kome, Frie, Kerstin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Royal College of General Practitioners 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7330219/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32265182
http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgpopen20X101069
_version_ 1783553068853362688
author Gbinigie, Kome
Frie, Kerstin
author_facet Gbinigie, Kome
Frie, Kerstin
author_sort Gbinigie, Kome
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: On the 11 March 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared that COVID-19 was a pandemic. To date, there are no medical treatments for COVID-19 with proven effectiveness. Novel treatments and/or vaccines will take time to be developed and distributed to patients. In light of this, there has been growing interest in the use of existing medications, such as chloroquine (CQ) and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), as potential treatments of this disease. AIM: To establish the current evidence for the effectiveness of CQ and HCQ in treating COVID-19. DESIGN & SETTING: A rapid review of the literature was conducted. METHOD: Electronic searches in PubMed and Google Scholar were conducted on 21 March 2020. A further search was conducted in Google for relevant literature on 28 March 2020. RESULTS: There is limited evidence of in vitro activity of CQ/HCQ against SARS-CoV-2. A number of in vivo clinical trials are underway. The empirical data available from two of these trials reveal conflicting results. Both trials are characterised by small numbers of participants (n = 30 and n = 36) and suffer methodological limitations. No medium or long-term follow-up data is available. CONCLUSION: At present, there is insufficient evidence to determine whether CQ/HCQ are safe and effective treatments for COVID-19. High quality, adequately powered randomised clinical trials in primary and secondary care settings are urgently required to guide policymakers and clinicians. These studies should report medium- and long-term follow-up results, and safety data.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7330219
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Royal College of General Practitioners
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73302192020-07-07 Should chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine be used to treat COVID-19? A rapid review Gbinigie, Kome Frie, Kerstin BJGP Open Research BACKGROUND: On the 11 March 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared that COVID-19 was a pandemic. To date, there are no medical treatments for COVID-19 with proven effectiveness. Novel treatments and/or vaccines will take time to be developed and distributed to patients. In light of this, there has been growing interest in the use of existing medications, such as chloroquine (CQ) and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), as potential treatments of this disease. AIM: To establish the current evidence for the effectiveness of CQ and HCQ in treating COVID-19. DESIGN & SETTING: A rapid review of the literature was conducted. METHOD: Electronic searches in PubMed and Google Scholar were conducted on 21 March 2020. A further search was conducted in Google for relevant literature on 28 March 2020. RESULTS: There is limited evidence of in vitro activity of CQ/HCQ against SARS-CoV-2. A number of in vivo clinical trials are underway. The empirical data available from two of these trials reveal conflicting results. Both trials are characterised by small numbers of participants (n = 30 and n = 36) and suffer methodological limitations. No medium or long-term follow-up data is available. CONCLUSION: At present, there is insufficient evidence to determine whether CQ/HCQ are safe and effective treatments for COVID-19. High quality, adequately powered randomised clinical trials in primary and secondary care settings are urgently required to guide policymakers and clinicians. These studies should report medium- and long-term follow-up results, and safety data. Royal College of General Practitioners 2020-04-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7330219/ /pubmed/32265182 http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgpopen20X101069 Text en Copyright © 2020, The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is Open Access: CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
spellingShingle Research
Gbinigie, Kome
Frie, Kerstin
Should chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine be used to treat COVID-19? A rapid review
title Should chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine be used to treat COVID-19? A rapid review
title_full Should chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine be used to treat COVID-19? A rapid review
title_fullStr Should chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine be used to treat COVID-19? A rapid review
title_full_unstemmed Should chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine be used to treat COVID-19? A rapid review
title_short Should chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine be used to treat COVID-19? A rapid review
title_sort should chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine be used to treat covid-19? a rapid review
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7330219/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32265182
http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgpopen20X101069
work_keys_str_mv AT gbinigiekome shouldchloroquineandhydroxychloroquinebeusedtotreatcovid19arapidreview
AT friekerstin shouldchloroquineandhydroxychloroquinebeusedtotreatcovid19arapidreview