Primary pneumonectomy, pneumonectomy after induction therapy, and salvage pneumonectomy: a comparison of surgical and prognostic outcomes

BACKGROUND: Surgical outcomes of pneumonectomy for lung cancer differ based on various therapeutic strategies. METHODS: One hundred and fifty-one patients who underwent pneumonectomy were divided into three groups based on patients’ therapeutic conditions: a primary pneumonectomy group (no preoperative treatment, n=137), an induction group (planned surgery after induction chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy, n=10), and a salvage group (surgery for residual or enlarged lesions after radical non-operative therapies, n=4). RESULTS: Multivariate analysis showed that completeness of resection (P=0.003), subcategorization of whether there was no invasion, infiltration only to the main bronchus or pleura, or invasion of other deeper structures (P=0.008), and the presence or absence of mediastinal lymph node metastasis (P=0.033) were significant prognostic factors. Severe postoperative complications occurred in 5.1% (7/137), 20% (2/10), and 0% (0/4) in the primary pneumonectomy, induction, and salvage groups, respectively. Among patients with pN0-1 disease, the 3-year overall survival rate was 58.7% in the primary pneumonectomy group, 100% and 40% in cases with high and low pathological effects in the induction group, respectively, and 50% in the salvage group. Among patients with pN2 disease, this rate was 41.4% in the primary pneumonectomy group, and no patients survived for postoperative 2 years in the other groups. CONCLUSIONS: For patients undergoing pneumonectomy, subcategorization based on the invasion status (none/bronchus/pleura or other deeper structures) is a crucial prognostic factor. To consider pneumonectomy in the induction or salvage setting, selecting patients with pN0-1 disease may be mandatory.