Cargando…

The Cryoballoon vs Irrigated Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation (CIRCA-DOSE) Study Results in Context

The Cryoballoon vs Irrigated Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation: Double Short vs Standard Exposure Duration (CIRCA-DOSE) study was a multicentre, randomised, single-blinded trial that compared contact-force radiofrequency ablation and two different regimens of cryoballoon ablation. All patients receiv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Andrade, Jason G, Deyell, Marc W, Verma, Atul, Macle, Laurent, Khairy, Paul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Radcliffe Cardiology 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7330729/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32637118
http://dx.doi.org/10.15420/aer.2019.13
_version_ 1783553182266294272
author Andrade, Jason G
Deyell, Marc W
Verma, Atul
Macle, Laurent
Khairy, Paul
author_facet Andrade, Jason G
Deyell, Marc W
Verma, Atul
Macle, Laurent
Khairy, Paul
author_sort Andrade, Jason G
collection PubMed
description The Cryoballoon vs Irrigated Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation: Double Short vs Standard Exposure Duration (CIRCA-DOSE) study was a multicentre, randomised, single-blinded trial that compared contact-force radiofrequency ablation and two different regimens of cryoballoon ablation. All patients received an implantable cardiac monitor for the purpose of continuous rhythm monitoring, with all arrhythmia events undergoing independent adjudication by a committee blinded to treatment allocation. The study demonstrated there were no significant differences between contact-force radiofrequency ablation and cryoballoon ablation with respect to recurrence of any atrial tachyarrhythmia, symptomatic atrial tachyarrhythmia, asymptomatic AF, symptomatic AF or AF burden. While the results of the CIRCA-DOSE study are reviewed here, this article focuses on considerations around the design of the study and places the observed outcomes in context.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7330729
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Radcliffe Cardiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73307292020-07-06 The Cryoballoon vs Irrigated Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation (CIRCA-DOSE) Study Results in Context Andrade, Jason G Deyell, Marc W Verma, Atul Macle, Laurent Khairy, Paul Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev Clinical Arrhythmias The Cryoballoon vs Irrigated Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation: Double Short vs Standard Exposure Duration (CIRCA-DOSE) study was a multicentre, randomised, single-blinded trial that compared contact-force radiofrequency ablation and two different regimens of cryoballoon ablation. All patients received an implantable cardiac monitor for the purpose of continuous rhythm monitoring, with all arrhythmia events undergoing independent adjudication by a committee blinded to treatment allocation. The study demonstrated there were no significant differences between contact-force radiofrequency ablation and cryoballoon ablation with respect to recurrence of any atrial tachyarrhythmia, symptomatic atrial tachyarrhythmia, asymptomatic AF, symptomatic AF or AF burden. While the results of the CIRCA-DOSE study are reviewed here, this article focuses on considerations around the design of the study and places the observed outcomes in context. Radcliffe Cardiology 2020-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7330729/ /pubmed/32637118 http://dx.doi.org/10.15420/aer.2019.13 Text en Copyright © 2020, Radcliffe Cardiology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/legalcode This work is open access under the CC-BY-NC 4.0 License which allows users to copy, redistribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes, provided the original work is cited correctly.
spellingShingle Clinical Arrhythmias
Andrade, Jason G
Deyell, Marc W
Verma, Atul
Macle, Laurent
Khairy, Paul
The Cryoballoon vs Irrigated Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation (CIRCA-DOSE) Study Results in Context
title The Cryoballoon vs Irrigated Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation (CIRCA-DOSE) Study Results in Context
title_full The Cryoballoon vs Irrigated Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation (CIRCA-DOSE) Study Results in Context
title_fullStr The Cryoballoon vs Irrigated Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation (CIRCA-DOSE) Study Results in Context
title_full_unstemmed The Cryoballoon vs Irrigated Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation (CIRCA-DOSE) Study Results in Context
title_short The Cryoballoon vs Irrigated Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation (CIRCA-DOSE) Study Results in Context
title_sort cryoballoon vs irrigated radiofrequency catheter ablation (circa-dose) study results in context
topic Clinical Arrhythmias
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7330729/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32637118
http://dx.doi.org/10.15420/aer.2019.13
work_keys_str_mv AT andradejasong thecryoballoonvsirrigatedradiofrequencycatheterablationcircadosestudyresultsincontext
AT deyellmarcw thecryoballoonvsirrigatedradiofrequencycatheterablationcircadosestudyresultsincontext
AT vermaatul thecryoballoonvsirrigatedradiofrequencycatheterablationcircadosestudyresultsincontext
AT maclelaurent thecryoballoonvsirrigatedradiofrequencycatheterablationcircadosestudyresultsincontext
AT khairypaul thecryoballoonvsirrigatedradiofrequencycatheterablationcircadosestudyresultsincontext
AT andradejasong cryoballoonvsirrigatedradiofrequencycatheterablationcircadosestudyresultsincontext
AT deyellmarcw cryoballoonvsirrigatedradiofrequencycatheterablationcircadosestudyresultsincontext
AT vermaatul cryoballoonvsirrigatedradiofrequencycatheterablationcircadosestudyresultsincontext
AT maclelaurent cryoballoonvsirrigatedradiofrequencycatheterablationcircadosestudyresultsincontext
AT khairypaul cryoballoonvsirrigatedradiofrequencycatheterablationcircadosestudyresultsincontext