Cargando…

Biohydrogen Production by Catalytic Supercritical Water Gasification: A Comparative Study

[Image: see text] In this article, supercritical water gasification of biocrude at different conditions was performed and compared to each other. Three scenarios were considered while treating biocrude originating from cattle manure (CM) and corn husk (CH), namely, uncatalyzed feedstock, catalyzed w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tushar, Mohammad Shahed Hasan Khan, DiMaria, Paul C., Al-Salem, Sultan Majed, Dutta, Animesh, Xu, Chunbao Charles
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2020
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7331078/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32637813
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.9b01782
_version_ 1783553248985088000
author Tushar, Mohammad Shahed Hasan Khan
DiMaria, Paul C.
Al-Salem, Sultan Majed
Dutta, Animesh
Xu, Chunbao Charles
author_facet Tushar, Mohammad Shahed Hasan Khan
DiMaria, Paul C.
Al-Salem, Sultan Majed
Dutta, Animesh
Xu, Chunbao Charles
author_sort Tushar, Mohammad Shahed Hasan Khan
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] In this article, supercritical water gasification of biocrude at different conditions was performed and compared to each other. Three scenarios were considered while treating biocrude originating from cattle manure (CM) and corn husk (CH), namely, uncatalyzed feedstock, catalyzed with 10% Ni–0.08% Ru/Al(2)O(3) and finally catalyzed with 10% Ni–0.08% Ru/Al(2)O(3)–ZrO(2). It was found that 10% Ni–0.08% Ru/Al(2)O(3)–ZrO(2) has performed significantly better than the other two scenarios over the 5 hour run time with a 193 and 187% higher hydrogen yield compared to the uncatalyzed and 10% Ni–0.08% Ru/Al(2)O(3) catalyzed scenarios, respectively. Compared to CM gasification in the presence of a 10% Ni–0.08% Ru/Al(2)O(3)–ZrO(2) catalyst, the catalyst got deactivated because of the high phenol and furan content in the corn husk biocrude, therefore hydrogen yield performance fell significantly. It was observed that the carbon gasification efficiency of the biocrude was independent of temperature. In terms of carbon conversion, the equilibrium conditions for the biocrude considered were attained at lower temperature. A mechanistic model based on the Eley–Rideal method was devised and tested against the obtained data. The dissociation of adsorbed oxygenated hydrocarbon is found to be the rate-determining step with an average absolute deviation of 3.55%.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7331078
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73310782020-07-06 Biohydrogen Production by Catalytic Supercritical Water Gasification: A Comparative Study Tushar, Mohammad Shahed Hasan Khan DiMaria, Paul C. Al-Salem, Sultan Majed Dutta, Animesh Xu, Chunbao Charles ACS Omega [Image: see text] In this article, supercritical water gasification of biocrude at different conditions was performed and compared to each other. Three scenarios were considered while treating biocrude originating from cattle manure (CM) and corn husk (CH), namely, uncatalyzed feedstock, catalyzed with 10% Ni–0.08% Ru/Al(2)O(3) and finally catalyzed with 10% Ni–0.08% Ru/Al(2)O(3)–ZrO(2). It was found that 10% Ni–0.08% Ru/Al(2)O(3)–ZrO(2) has performed significantly better than the other two scenarios over the 5 hour run time with a 193 and 187% higher hydrogen yield compared to the uncatalyzed and 10% Ni–0.08% Ru/Al(2)O(3) catalyzed scenarios, respectively. Compared to CM gasification in the presence of a 10% Ni–0.08% Ru/Al(2)O(3)–ZrO(2) catalyst, the catalyst got deactivated because of the high phenol and furan content in the corn husk biocrude, therefore hydrogen yield performance fell significantly. It was observed that the carbon gasification efficiency of the biocrude was independent of temperature. In terms of carbon conversion, the equilibrium conditions for the biocrude considered were attained at lower temperature. A mechanistic model based on the Eley–Rideal method was devised and tested against the obtained data. The dissociation of adsorbed oxygenated hydrocarbon is found to be the rate-determining step with an average absolute deviation of 3.55%. American Chemical Society 2020-06-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7331078/ /pubmed/32637813 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.9b01782 Text en Copyright © 2020 American Chemical Society This is an open access article published under an ACS AuthorChoice License (http://pubs.acs.org/page/policy/authorchoice_termsofuse.html) , which permits copying and redistribution of the article or any adaptations for non-commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Tushar, Mohammad Shahed Hasan Khan
DiMaria, Paul C.
Al-Salem, Sultan Majed
Dutta, Animesh
Xu, Chunbao Charles
Biohydrogen Production by Catalytic Supercritical Water Gasification: A Comparative Study
title Biohydrogen Production by Catalytic Supercritical Water Gasification: A Comparative Study
title_full Biohydrogen Production by Catalytic Supercritical Water Gasification: A Comparative Study
title_fullStr Biohydrogen Production by Catalytic Supercritical Water Gasification: A Comparative Study
title_full_unstemmed Biohydrogen Production by Catalytic Supercritical Water Gasification: A Comparative Study
title_short Biohydrogen Production by Catalytic Supercritical Water Gasification: A Comparative Study
title_sort biohydrogen production by catalytic supercritical water gasification: a comparative study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7331078/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32637813
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.9b01782
work_keys_str_mv AT tusharmohammadshahedhasankhan biohydrogenproductionbycatalyticsupercriticalwatergasificationacomparativestudy
AT dimariapaulc biohydrogenproductionbycatalyticsupercriticalwatergasificationacomparativestudy
AT alsalemsultanmajed biohydrogenproductionbycatalyticsupercriticalwatergasificationacomparativestudy
AT duttaanimesh biohydrogenproductionbycatalyticsupercriticalwatergasificationacomparativestudy
AT xuchunbaocharles biohydrogenproductionbycatalyticsupercriticalwatergasificationacomparativestudy