Cargando…

Development of the RMT20, a composite screener to identify common mental disorders

BACKGROUND: There are few very brief measures that accurately identify multiple common mental disorders. AIMS: The aim of this study was to develop and assess the psychometric properties of a new composite measure to screen for five common mental disorders. METHOD: Two cross-sectional psychometric s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Batterham, Philip J., Sunderland, Matthew, Carragher, Natacha, Calear, Alison L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7331084/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32419687
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2020.37
_version_ 1783553250403811328
author Batterham, Philip J.
Sunderland, Matthew
Carragher, Natacha
Calear, Alison L.
author_facet Batterham, Philip J.
Sunderland, Matthew
Carragher, Natacha
Calear, Alison L.
author_sort Batterham, Philip J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There are few very brief measures that accurately identify multiple common mental disorders. AIMS: The aim of this study was to develop and assess the psychometric properties of a new composite measure to screen for five common mental disorders. METHOD: Two cross-sectional psychometric surveys were used to develop (n = 3175) and validate (n = 3620) the new measure, the Rapid Measurement Toolkit-20 (RMT20) against diagnostic criteria. The RMT20 was tested against a DSM-5 clinical checklist for major depression, generalised anxiety disorder, panic disorder, social anxiety disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder, with comparison with two measures of general psychological distress: the Kessler-10 and Distress Questionnaire-5. RESULTS: The area under the curve for the RMT20 was significantly greater than for the distress measures, ranging from 0.86 to 0.92 across the five disorders. Sensitivity and specificity at prescribed cut-points were excellent, with sensitivity ranging from 0.85 to 0.93 and specificity ranging from 0.73 to 0.83 across the five disorders. CONCLUSIONS: The RMT20 outperformed two established scales assessing general psychological distress, is free to use and has low respondent burden. The measure is well-suited to clinical screening, internet-based screening and large-scale epidemiological surveys.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7331084
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73310842020-07-09 Development of the RMT20, a composite screener to identify common mental disorders Batterham, Philip J. Sunderland, Matthew Carragher, Natacha Calear, Alison L. BJPsych Open Papers BACKGROUND: There are few very brief measures that accurately identify multiple common mental disorders. AIMS: The aim of this study was to develop and assess the psychometric properties of a new composite measure to screen for five common mental disorders. METHOD: Two cross-sectional psychometric surveys were used to develop (n = 3175) and validate (n = 3620) the new measure, the Rapid Measurement Toolkit-20 (RMT20) against diagnostic criteria. The RMT20 was tested against a DSM-5 clinical checklist for major depression, generalised anxiety disorder, panic disorder, social anxiety disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder, with comparison with two measures of general psychological distress: the Kessler-10 and Distress Questionnaire-5. RESULTS: The area under the curve for the RMT20 was significantly greater than for the distress measures, ranging from 0.86 to 0.92 across the five disorders. Sensitivity and specificity at prescribed cut-points were excellent, with sensitivity ranging from 0.85 to 0.93 and specificity ranging from 0.73 to 0.83 across the five disorders. CONCLUSIONS: The RMT20 outperformed two established scales assessing general psychological distress, is free to use and has low respondent burden. The measure is well-suited to clinical screening, internet-based screening and large-scale epidemiological surveys. Cambridge University Press 2020-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7331084/ /pubmed/32419687 http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2020.37 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Papers
Batterham, Philip J.
Sunderland, Matthew
Carragher, Natacha
Calear, Alison L.
Development of the RMT20, a composite screener to identify common mental disorders
title Development of the RMT20, a composite screener to identify common mental disorders
title_full Development of the RMT20, a composite screener to identify common mental disorders
title_fullStr Development of the RMT20, a composite screener to identify common mental disorders
title_full_unstemmed Development of the RMT20, a composite screener to identify common mental disorders
title_short Development of the RMT20, a composite screener to identify common mental disorders
title_sort development of the rmt20, a composite screener to identify common mental disorders
topic Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7331084/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32419687
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2020.37
work_keys_str_mv AT batterhamphilipj developmentofthermt20acompositescreenertoidentifycommonmentaldisorders
AT sunderlandmatthew developmentofthermt20acompositescreenertoidentifycommonmentaldisorders
AT carraghernatacha developmentofthermt20acompositescreenertoidentifycommonmentaldisorders
AT calearalisonl developmentofthermt20acompositescreenertoidentifycommonmentaldisorders