Cargando…

Measuring the effects of exercise in neuromuscular disorders: a systematic review and meta-analyses

Background: The benefit and safety of exercise training for patients with neuromuscular disorders (NMDs) has long been a contentious topic. This is, in part, due to recognised challenges associated with rare diseases including small and heterogenous patient populations. We performed a systematic rev...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stefanetti, Renae J., Blain, Alasdair, Jimenez-Moreno, Cecilia, Errington, Linda, Ng, Yi Shiau, McFarland, Robert, Turnbull, Doug M., Newman, Jane, Gorman, Gráinne S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: F1000 Research Limited 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7331112/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32671231
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15825.1
_version_ 1783553255673954304
author Stefanetti, Renae J.
Blain, Alasdair
Jimenez-Moreno, Cecilia
Errington, Linda
Ng, Yi Shiau
McFarland, Robert
Turnbull, Doug M.
Newman, Jane
Gorman, Gráinne S
author_facet Stefanetti, Renae J.
Blain, Alasdair
Jimenez-Moreno, Cecilia
Errington, Linda
Ng, Yi Shiau
McFarland, Robert
Turnbull, Doug M.
Newman, Jane
Gorman, Gráinne S
author_sort Stefanetti, Renae J.
collection PubMed
description Background: The benefit and safety of exercise training for patients with neuromuscular disorders (NMDs) has long been a contentious topic. This is, in part, due to recognised challenges associated with rare diseases including small and heterogenous patient populations. We performed a systematic review and meta-analyses to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of interventional exercise and establish minimal clinically important differences (MCID) in outcomes to facilitate clinical interpretation. Methods: We searched six databases from inception to Mar 2018. Aerobic, strength, and combined (aerobic and strength) intervention were eligible. Meta-analyses compared outcomes at baseline with those after at least six weeks (before-after exercise within individuals). A further meta-analysis compared outcomes before-after exercise between groups (exercise training versus usual care). Disease heterogeneity was explored using a random effect model. This study was registered (PROSPERO, CRD42018102183). An interactive database was developed to facilitate full interrogations of data. Results: We identified 130 articles describing 1,805 participants with 35 different forms of NMD. Of these studies, 76 were suitable for meta-analyses. Within group and between group meta-analyses detected an increase in peak aerobic capacity (p=0·04), and peak power (p=0·01). Six-minute walk test (p=0·04), sit-to-stand (STS) (repetitions) (p=0·03), STS (seconds) (p=0·04), rise from supine (p=0·008), SF-36 (p=0·0003), fatigue severity (p=<0·0001), citrate synthase (p=0·0002), central nuclei (p=0·04), type 1 (p=0·002) and type II muscle fibre area (p=0·003), were only able to detect change within group meta-analyses. Substantial I (2) statistic heterogeneity was revealed for STS (seconds) ( I²=58·5%; p=0·04) and citrate synthase ( I²=70·90%; p=0·002), otherwise heterogeneity for all outcomes was low. No study-related serious adverse events were reported nor significant increases in creatine kinase. Conclusions: Exercise training in patients with NMDs appears to cause no harm across a range of outcomes. With the emergence of new therapeutic strategies, defining MCID is vital in informing future clinical trial design.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7331112
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher F1000 Research Limited
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73311122020-07-14 Measuring the effects of exercise in neuromuscular disorders: a systematic review and meta-analyses Stefanetti, Renae J. Blain, Alasdair Jimenez-Moreno, Cecilia Errington, Linda Ng, Yi Shiau McFarland, Robert Turnbull, Doug M. Newman, Jane Gorman, Gráinne S Wellcome Open Res Systematic Review Background: The benefit and safety of exercise training for patients with neuromuscular disorders (NMDs) has long been a contentious topic. This is, in part, due to recognised challenges associated with rare diseases including small and heterogenous patient populations. We performed a systematic review and meta-analyses to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of interventional exercise and establish minimal clinically important differences (MCID) in outcomes to facilitate clinical interpretation. Methods: We searched six databases from inception to Mar 2018. Aerobic, strength, and combined (aerobic and strength) intervention were eligible. Meta-analyses compared outcomes at baseline with those after at least six weeks (before-after exercise within individuals). A further meta-analysis compared outcomes before-after exercise between groups (exercise training versus usual care). Disease heterogeneity was explored using a random effect model. This study was registered (PROSPERO, CRD42018102183). An interactive database was developed to facilitate full interrogations of data. Results: We identified 130 articles describing 1,805 participants with 35 different forms of NMD. Of these studies, 76 were suitable for meta-analyses. Within group and between group meta-analyses detected an increase in peak aerobic capacity (p=0·04), and peak power (p=0·01). Six-minute walk test (p=0·04), sit-to-stand (STS) (repetitions) (p=0·03), STS (seconds) (p=0·04), rise from supine (p=0·008), SF-36 (p=0·0003), fatigue severity (p=<0·0001), citrate synthase (p=0·0002), central nuclei (p=0·04), type 1 (p=0·002) and type II muscle fibre area (p=0·003), were only able to detect change within group meta-analyses. Substantial I (2) statistic heterogeneity was revealed for STS (seconds) ( I²=58·5%; p=0·04) and citrate synthase ( I²=70·90%; p=0·002), otherwise heterogeneity for all outcomes was low. No study-related serious adverse events were reported nor significant increases in creatine kinase. Conclusions: Exercise training in patients with NMDs appears to cause no harm across a range of outcomes. With the emergence of new therapeutic strategies, defining MCID is vital in informing future clinical trial design. F1000 Research Limited 2020-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7331112/ /pubmed/32671231 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15825.1 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Stefanetti RJ et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Stefanetti, Renae J.
Blain, Alasdair
Jimenez-Moreno, Cecilia
Errington, Linda
Ng, Yi Shiau
McFarland, Robert
Turnbull, Doug M.
Newman, Jane
Gorman, Gráinne S
Measuring the effects of exercise in neuromuscular disorders: a systematic review and meta-analyses
title Measuring the effects of exercise in neuromuscular disorders: a systematic review and meta-analyses
title_full Measuring the effects of exercise in neuromuscular disorders: a systematic review and meta-analyses
title_fullStr Measuring the effects of exercise in neuromuscular disorders: a systematic review and meta-analyses
title_full_unstemmed Measuring the effects of exercise in neuromuscular disorders: a systematic review and meta-analyses
title_short Measuring the effects of exercise in neuromuscular disorders: a systematic review and meta-analyses
title_sort measuring the effects of exercise in neuromuscular disorders: a systematic review and meta-analyses
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7331112/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32671231
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15825.1
work_keys_str_mv AT stefanettirenaej measuringtheeffectsofexerciseinneuromusculardisordersasystematicreviewandmetaanalyses
AT blainalasdair measuringtheeffectsofexerciseinneuromusculardisordersasystematicreviewandmetaanalyses
AT jimenezmorenocecilia measuringtheeffectsofexerciseinneuromusculardisordersasystematicreviewandmetaanalyses
AT erringtonlinda measuringtheeffectsofexerciseinneuromusculardisordersasystematicreviewandmetaanalyses
AT ngyishiau measuringtheeffectsofexerciseinneuromusculardisordersasystematicreviewandmetaanalyses
AT mcfarlandrobert measuringtheeffectsofexerciseinneuromusculardisordersasystematicreviewandmetaanalyses
AT turnbulldougm measuringtheeffectsofexerciseinneuromusculardisordersasystematicreviewandmetaanalyses
AT newmanjane measuringtheeffectsofexerciseinneuromusculardisordersasystematicreviewandmetaanalyses
AT gormangrainnes measuringtheeffectsofexerciseinneuromusculardisordersasystematicreviewandmetaanalyses