Cargando…

Interpretation bias modification to reduce body dissatisfaction – a randomized controlled pilot study in women with elevated weight and shape concerns

BACKGROUND: Recent research has identified several cognitive biases in patients with eating disorders, such as a tendency to interpret ambiguous information about one’s own body in a negative way. The so-called “negative interpretation bias” is considered to be a key factor in maintaining maladaptiv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bradatsch, Silvia, Vahl, Marlene Dorit, Potterton, Rachel, Gordon, Gemma, Schmidt, Ulrike, Brockmeyer, Timo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7331132/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32637101
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40337-020-00305-4
_version_ 1783553260038127616
author Bradatsch, Silvia
Vahl, Marlene Dorit
Potterton, Rachel
Gordon, Gemma
Schmidt, Ulrike
Brockmeyer, Timo
author_facet Bradatsch, Silvia
Vahl, Marlene Dorit
Potterton, Rachel
Gordon, Gemma
Schmidt, Ulrike
Brockmeyer, Timo
author_sort Bradatsch, Silvia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recent research has identified several cognitive biases in patients with eating disorders, such as a tendency to interpret ambiguous information about one’s own body in a negative way. The so-called “negative interpretation bias” is considered to be a key factor in maintaining maladaptive cognitions and behaviors in eating disorders. Studies on modification of the negative interpretation bias in eating disorders have yielded mixed results. This randomized controlled pilot study examined whether a specially adapted, computerized version of the Scrambled Sentences Task modifies negative interpretation bias in women with elevated body dissatisfaction. METHODS: The sample consisted of 40 normal-weight women with elevated body dissatisfaction, randomly assigned either to an intervention or a no-intervention control group (each n = 20). The intervention group received six sessions (within two weeks) of a newly-developed interpretation bias modification training that involved unscrambling positively valenced, body image-related sentences. The control group received no intervention. In both groups, body image-related negative interpretation bias (main outcome), trait body dissatisfaction and thin-ideal cue reactivity were assessed at baseline and two weeks later. Additionally, in the intervention condition, the trajectory of expected reductions in the thin-ideal internalization was measured during each training session. RESULTS: In both conditions, body image-related negative interpretation bias and trait body dissatisfaction decreased significantly from pre- to post-assessment; however, a specific effect imparted by the interpretation bias modification training was not found. Groups did not differ in thin-ideal cue reactivity. In the intervention group, thin-ideal internalization decreased significantly over the training sessions. CONCLUSIONS: The findings do not support use of body image-related interpretation bias modification in its current form in the treatment of body dissatisfaction. Further research involving different versions of the training and clinical samples is warranted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7331132
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73311322020-07-06 Interpretation bias modification to reduce body dissatisfaction – a randomized controlled pilot study in women with elevated weight and shape concerns Bradatsch, Silvia Vahl, Marlene Dorit Potterton, Rachel Gordon, Gemma Schmidt, Ulrike Brockmeyer, Timo J Eat Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Recent research has identified several cognitive biases in patients with eating disorders, such as a tendency to interpret ambiguous information about one’s own body in a negative way. The so-called “negative interpretation bias” is considered to be a key factor in maintaining maladaptive cognitions and behaviors in eating disorders. Studies on modification of the negative interpretation bias in eating disorders have yielded mixed results. This randomized controlled pilot study examined whether a specially adapted, computerized version of the Scrambled Sentences Task modifies negative interpretation bias in women with elevated body dissatisfaction. METHODS: The sample consisted of 40 normal-weight women with elevated body dissatisfaction, randomly assigned either to an intervention or a no-intervention control group (each n = 20). The intervention group received six sessions (within two weeks) of a newly-developed interpretation bias modification training that involved unscrambling positively valenced, body image-related sentences. The control group received no intervention. In both groups, body image-related negative interpretation bias (main outcome), trait body dissatisfaction and thin-ideal cue reactivity were assessed at baseline and two weeks later. Additionally, in the intervention condition, the trajectory of expected reductions in the thin-ideal internalization was measured during each training session. RESULTS: In both conditions, body image-related negative interpretation bias and trait body dissatisfaction decreased significantly from pre- to post-assessment; however, a specific effect imparted by the interpretation bias modification training was not found. Groups did not differ in thin-ideal cue reactivity. In the intervention group, thin-ideal internalization decreased significantly over the training sessions. CONCLUSIONS: The findings do not support use of body image-related interpretation bias modification in its current form in the treatment of body dissatisfaction. Further research involving different versions of the training and clinical samples is warranted. BioMed Central 2020-07-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7331132/ /pubmed/32637101 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40337-020-00305-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bradatsch, Silvia
Vahl, Marlene Dorit
Potterton, Rachel
Gordon, Gemma
Schmidt, Ulrike
Brockmeyer, Timo
Interpretation bias modification to reduce body dissatisfaction – a randomized controlled pilot study in women with elevated weight and shape concerns
title Interpretation bias modification to reduce body dissatisfaction – a randomized controlled pilot study in women with elevated weight and shape concerns
title_full Interpretation bias modification to reduce body dissatisfaction – a randomized controlled pilot study in women with elevated weight and shape concerns
title_fullStr Interpretation bias modification to reduce body dissatisfaction – a randomized controlled pilot study in women with elevated weight and shape concerns
title_full_unstemmed Interpretation bias modification to reduce body dissatisfaction – a randomized controlled pilot study in women with elevated weight and shape concerns
title_short Interpretation bias modification to reduce body dissatisfaction – a randomized controlled pilot study in women with elevated weight and shape concerns
title_sort interpretation bias modification to reduce body dissatisfaction – a randomized controlled pilot study in women with elevated weight and shape concerns
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7331132/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32637101
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40337-020-00305-4
work_keys_str_mv AT bradatschsilvia interpretationbiasmodificationtoreducebodydissatisfactionarandomizedcontrolledpilotstudyinwomenwithelevatedweightandshapeconcerns
AT vahlmarlenedorit interpretationbiasmodificationtoreducebodydissatisfactionarandomizedcontrolledpilotstudyinwomenwithelevatedweightandshapeconcerns
AT pottertonrachel interpretationbiasmodificationtoreducebodydissatisfactionarandomizedcontrolledpilotstudyinwomenwithelevatedweightandshapeconcerns
AT gordongemma interpretationbiasmodificationtoreducebodydissatisfactionarandomizedcontrolledpilotstudyinwomenwithelevatedweightandshapeconcerns
AT schmidtulrike interpretationbiasmodificationtoreducebodydissatisfactionarandomizedcontrolledpilotstudyinwomenwithelevatedweightandshapeconcerns
AT brockmeyertimo interpretationbiasmodificationtoreducebodydissatisfactionarandomizedcontrolledpilotstudyinwomenwithelevatedweightandshapeconcerns