Cargando…
Recurrent invasive meningococcal infections – quantifying the risk, Germany, 2002 to 2018
INTRODUCTION: Invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) is a rare condition with a high case fatality rate. While most patients suffer from one single episode in life, there is anecdotal evidence for recurrent infection. AIM: The German National Reference Laboratory for Meningococci and Haemophilus influ...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC)
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7331141/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32613936 http://dx.doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.25.1900565 |
_version_ | 1783553262234894336 |
---|---|
author | Krone, Manuel Lâm, Thiên-Trí Claus, Heike Vogel, Ulrich |
author_facet | Krone, Manuel Lâm, Thiên-Trí Claus, Heike Vogel, Ulrich |
author_sort | Krone, Manuel |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) is a rare condition with a high case fatality rate. While most patients suffer from one single episode in life, there is anecdotal evidence for recurrent infection. AIM: The German National Reference Laboratory for Meningococci and Haemophilus influenzae (NRZMHi) analysed IMD cases from 2002 to 2018 to retrospectively quantify the risk of recurrent infection. METHODS: Recurrent IMD was defined as detection of Neisseria meningitidis in a sample of the same patient more than 30 days after the first episode of IMD. RESULTS: Among 5,854 patients with a median observation period of 9.4 years, 14 suffered a second IMD episode and one patient a third one. The risk of a recurrent IMD was 29.4 per 100,000 person-years for survivors of the first episode. Rare serogroups (Y, W, E and Z) were more common in patients with recurrent IMD (p < 0.0001). DISCUSSION: Patients surviving IMD were at least at a 50-fold risk of another IMD episode compared with the general population. The study most likely underestimated the risk of recurrent infection. Increased risk may be due to undiagnosed complement deficiencies. The high risk of re-infection argues for vaccination of patients who have survived IMD. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7331141 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73311412020-07-06 Recurrent invasive meningococcal infections – quantifying the risk, Germany, 2002 to 2018 Krone, Manuel Lâm, Thiên-Trí Claus, Heike Vogel, Ulrich Euro Surveill Research INTRODUCTION: Invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) is a rare condition with a high case fatality rate. While most patients suffer from one single episode in life, there is anecdotal evidence for recurrent infection. AIM: The German National Reference Laboratory for Meningococci and Haemophilus influenzae (NRZMHi) analysed IMD cases from 2002 to 2018 to retrospectively quantify the risk of recurrent infection. METHODS: Recurrent IMD was defined as detection of Neisseria meningitidis in a sample of the same patient more than 30 days after the first episode of IMD. RESULTS: Among 5,854 patients with a median observation period of 9.4 years, 14 suffered a second IMD episode and one patient a third one. The risk of a recurrent IMD was 29.4 per 100,000 person-years for survivors of the first episode. Rare serogroups (Y, W, E and Z) were more common in patients with recurrent IMD (p < 0.0001). DISCUSSION: Patients surviving IMD were at least at a 50-fold risk of another IMD episode compared with the general population. The study most likely underestimated the risk of recurrent infection. Increased risk may be due to undiagnosed complement deficiencies. The high risk of re-infection argues for vaccination of patients who have survived IMD. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) 2020-06-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7331141/ /pubmed/32613936 http://dx.doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.25.1900565 Text en This article is copyright of the authors or their affiliated institutions, 2020. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) Licence. You may share and adapt the material, but must give appropriate credit to the source, provide a link to the licence, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Research Krone, Manuel Lâm, Thiên-Trí Claus, Heike Vogel, Ulrich Recurrent invasive meningococcal infections – quantifying the risk, Germany, 2002 to 2018 |
title | Recurrent invasive meningococcal infections – quantifying the risk, Germany, 2002 to 2018 |
title_full | Recurrent invasive meningococcal infections – quantifying the risk, Germany, 2002 to 2018 |
title_fullStr | Recurrent invasive meningococcal infections – quantifying the risk, Germany, 2002 to 2018 |
title_full_unstemmed | Recurrent invasive meningococcal infections – quantifying the risk, Germany, 2002 to 2018 |
title_short | Recurrent invasive meningococcal infections – quantifying the risk, Germany, 2002 to 2018 |
title_sort | recurrent invasive meningococcal infections – quantifying the risk, germany, 2002 to 2018 |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7331141/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32613936 http://dx.doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.25.1900565 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kronemanuel recurrentinvasivemeningococcalinfectionsquantifyingtheriskgermany2002to2018 AT lamthientri recurrentinvasivemeningococcalinfectionsquantifyingtheriskgermany2002to2018 AT clausheike recurrentinvasivemeningococcalinfectionsquantifyingtheriskgermany2002to2018 AT vogelulrich recurrentinvasivemeningococcalinfectionsquantifyingtheriskgermany2002to2018 |