Cargando…

Recurrent invasive meningococcal infections – quantifying the risk, Germany, 2002 to 2018

INTRODUCTION: Invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) is a rare condition with a high case fatality rate. While most patients suffer from one single episode in life, there is anecdotal evidence for recurrent infection. AIM: The German National Reference Laboratory for Meningococci and Haemophilus influ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Krone, Manuel, Lâm, Thiên-Trí, Claus, Heike, Vogel, Ulrich
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7331141/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32613936
http://dx.doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.25.1900565
_version_ 1783553262234894336
author Krone, Manuel
Lâm, Thiên-Trí
Claus, Heike
Vogel, Ulrich
author_facet Krone, Manuel
Lâm, Thiên-Trí
Claus, Heike
Vogel, Ulrich
author_sort Krone, Manuel
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) is a rare condition with a high case fatality rate. While most patients suffer from one single episode in life, there is anecdotal evidence for recurrent infection. AIM: The German National Reference Laboratory for Meningococci and Haemophilus influenzae (NRZMHi) analysed IMD cases from 2002 to 2018 to retrospectively quantify the risk of recurrent infection. METHODS: Recurrent IMD was defined as detection of Neisseria meningitidis in a sample of the same patient more than 30 days after the first episode of IMD. RESULTS: Among 5,854 patients with a median observation period of 9.4 years, 14 suffered a second IMD episode and one patient a third one. The risk of a recurrent IMD was 29.4 per 100,000 person-years for survivors of the first episode. Rare serogroups (Y, W, E and Z) were more common in patients with recurrent IMD (p < 0.0001). DISCUSSION: Patients surviving IMD were at least at a 50-fold risk of another IMD episode compared with the general population. The study most likely underestimated the risk of recurrent infection. Increased risk may be due to undiagnosed complement deficiencies. The high risk of re-infection argues for vaccination of patients who have survived IMD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7331141
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC)
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73311412020-07-06 Recurrent invasive meningococcal infections – quantifying the risk, Germany, 2002 to 2018 Krone, Manuel Lâm, Thiên-Trí Claus, Heike Vogel, Ulrich Euro Surveill Research INTRODUCTION: Invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) is a rare condition with a high case fatality rate. While most patients suffer from one single episode in life, there is anecdotal evidence for recurrent infection. AIM: The German National Reference Laboratory for Meningococci and Haemophilus influenzae (NRZMHi) analysed IMD cases from 2002 to 2018 to retrospectively quantify the risk of recurrent infection. METHODS: Recurrent IMD was defined as detection of Neisseria meningitidis in a sample of the same patient more than 30 days after the first episode of IMD. RESULTS: Among 5,854 patients with a median observation period of 9.4 years, 14 suffered a second IMD episode and one patient a third one. The risk of a recurrent IMD was 29.4 per 100,000 person-years for survivors of the first episode. Rare serogroups (Y, W, E and Z) were more common in patients with recurrent IMD (p < 0.0001). DISCUSSION: Patients surviving IMD were at least at a 50-fold risk of another IMD episode compared with the general population. The study most likely underestimated the risk of recurrent infection. Increased risk may be due to undiagnosed complement deficiencies. The high risk of re-infection argues for vaccination of patients who have survived IMD. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) 2020-06-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7331141/ /pubmed/32613936 http://dx.doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.25.1900565 Text en This article is copyright of the authors or their affiliated institutions, 2020. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) Licence. You may share and adapt the material, but must give appropriate credit to the source, provide a link to the licence, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research
Krone, Manuel
Lâm, Thiên-Trí
Claus, Heike
Vogel, Ulrich
Recurrent invasive meningococcal infections – quantifying the risk, Germany, 2002 to 2018
title Recurrent invasive meningococcal infections – quantifying the risk, Germany, 2002 to 2018
title_full Recurrent invasive meningococcal infections – quantifying the risk, Germany, 2002 to 2018
title_fullStr Recurrent invasive meningococcal infections – quantifying the risk, Germany, 2002 to 2018
title_full_unstemmed Recurrent invasive meningococcal infections – quantifying the risk, Germany, 2002 to 2018
title_short Recurrent invasive meningococcal infections – quantifying the risk, Germany, 2002 to 2018
title_sort recurrent invasive meningococcal infections – quantifying the risk, germany, 2002 to 2018
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7331141/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32613936
http://dx.doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.25.1900565
work_keys_str_mv AT kronemanuel recurrentinvasivemeningococcalinfectionsquantifyingtheriskgermany2002to2018
AT lamthientri recurrentinvasivemeningococcalinfectionsquantifyingtheriskgermany2002to2018
AT clausheike recurrentinvasivemeningococcalinfectionsquantifyingtheriskgermany2002to2018
AT vogelulrich recurrentinvasivemeningococcalinfectionsquantifyingtheriskgermany2002to2018