Cargando…

Improving pediatric resident laryngoscopy training through the use of a video laryngoscope

IMPORTANCE: Opportunities for pediatric residents to perform direct laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation (DLTI) are few and the success rate is low. OBJECTIVE: We hypothesize that incorporation of video laryngoscope (McGrath MAC) into pediatric residents DLTI simulation course will improve the simul...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lilitwat, Weerapong, McInnes, Andrew, Chauhan, Jigar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7331295/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32851256
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ped4.12056
Descripción
Sumario:IMPORTANCE: Opportunities for pediatric residents to perform direct laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation (DLTI) are few and the success rate is low. OBJECTIVE: We hypothesize that incorporation of video laryngoscope (McGrath MAC) into pediatric residents DLTI simulation course will improve the simulated DLTI success rate. METHODS: Residents were given 3 attempts at DLTI: (1) baseline using a conventional laryngoscope (CL); (2) using a video laryngoscope (VL); and (3) again using the CL. Residents were given up to 120 seconds to complete each DLTI attempt. Time to successful DLTI was collected. Residents recorded their best view (larynx, epiglottis, vocal cords) with each DLTI attempt. RESULTS: Prior to the intervention, 15/17 (88.2%) and 16/17 (94.1%) of the participants reported prior exposure to DLTI as “less than 10 total attempts” in simulated and live patients respectively. Seventeen pediatric residents performed 51 DLTI attempts (34 with a CL and 17 with the VL). Success rates for DLTI are as follows: Baseline with CL 11/17 (64.7%), VL 12/17 (70.6%), and last attempt with CL 13/17 (76.5%) (P = 0.15). Compared to the baseline, the use of VL resulted in a shorter but non‐significant decrease in time to successful DLTI (Mean 34.2 sec [SD, 22.0] vs. 56.5 sec [SD, 40.2]; P = 0.08). Repeat attempts at DLTI with the CL, however, were significantly shorter than baseline (Mean 20.3 sec [SD, 12.8] vs. 56.5 sec [SD, 40.2]; P = 0.003). Using the VL, more residents could visualize the vocal cords compared to the baseline (14/17 [82.3%] vs. 9/17 [52.9%]; P = 0.03). INTERPRETATION: Repeated training is certainly a way to improve successful DLTI. Use of VL as a new teaching method led to greater visualization of the vocal cords, shortening operating time and raising self‐confidence.