Cargando…

A Meta-Analysis of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Substance and Food Craving: What Effect Do Modulators Have?

Substance addiction and food addiction are significant social problems worldwide. In previous studies of substance addiction, transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been used to influence craving of substance or food. However, the reported effects are not always consistent due to inconsi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Jiasi, Qin, Jingmin, He, Qinghua, Zou, Zhiling
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7332543/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32670118
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00598
_version_ 1783553548199395328
author Chen, Jiasi
Qin, Jingmin
He, Qinghua
Zou, Zhiling
author_facet Chen, Jiasi
Qin, Jingmin
He, Qinghua
Zou, Zhiling
author_sort Chen, Jiasi
collection PubMed
description Substance addiction and food addiction are significant social problems worldwide. In previous studies of substance addiction, transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been used to influence craving of substance or food. However, the reported effects are not always consistent due to inconsistent experimental settings. The way modulators influence the effect of tDCS on substance addiction is worth exploring. This meta-analysis was conducted to estimate the effect size of tDCS on substance and food craving and to investigate the influence of potential modulators. We systemically identified and reviewed studies on substance/food craving using tDCS that were published between January 2008 to January 2020. A total of 32 eligible studies were identified. Hedges' g was computed as an indicator of the effect of tDCS and some potential moderators (substance type, stimulation sites, current intensities, number of sessions, duration of stimulation, and study design) were examined using subgroup analysis. Random effects analysis revealed a total medium effect size [Hedges' g = 0.536, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.389–0.683, after adjusting Hedges' g = 0.416, 95% CI: 0.262–0.570] preferring active over sham stimulation to reduce craving. A significant difference was observed between the number of sessions (repeated stimulation was better than single stimulation). The duration of stimulation may have a positive influence on the effects of tDCS. No other significant differences were found in other subgroups analysis. In conclusion, our results provided evidence that tDCS can be an effective way to reduce craving of substance or food, and longer multiple stimulus durations in all can more effectively reduce craving; however, the influences of modulators still need be to be examined in depth in future.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7332543
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73325432020-07-14 A Meta-Analysis of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Substance and Food Craving: What Effect Do Modulators Have? Chen, Jiasi Qin, Jingmin He, Qinghua Zou, Zhiling Front Psychiatry Psychiatry Substance addiction and food addiction are significant social problems worldwide. In previous studies of substance addiction, transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been used to influence craving of substance or food. However, the reported effects are not always consistent due to inconsistent experimental settings. The way modulators influence the effect of tDCS on substance addiction is worth exploring. This meta-analysis was conducted to estimate the effect size of tDCS on substance and food craving and to investigate the influence of potential modulators. We systemically identified and reviewed studies on substance/food craving using tDCS that were published between January 2008 to January 2020. A total of 32 eligible studies were identified. Hedges' g was computed as an indicator of the effect of tDCS and some potential moderators (substance type, stimulation sites, current intensities, number of sessions, duration of stimulation, and study design) were examined using subgroup analysis. Random effects analysis revealed a total medium effect size [Hedges' g = 0.536, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.389–0.683, after adjusting Hedges' g = 0.416, 95% CI: 0.262–0.570] preferring active over sham stimulation to reduce craving. A significant difference was observed between the number of sessions (repeated stimulation was better than single stimulation). The duration of stimulation may have a positive influence on the effects of tDCS. No other significant differences were found in other subgroups analysis. In conclusion, our results provided evidence that tDCS can be an effective way to reduce craving of substance or food, and longer multiple stimulus durations in all can more effectively reduce craving; however, the influences of modulators still need be to be examined in depth in future. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7332543/ /pubmed/32670118 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00598 Text en Copyright © 2020 Chen, Qin, He and Zou http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychiatry
Chen, Jiasi
Qin, Jingmin
He, Qinghua
Zou, Zhiling
A Meta-Analysis of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Substance and Food Craving: What Effect Do Modulators Have?
title A Meta-Analysis of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Substance and Food Craving: What Effect Do Modulators Have?
title_full A Meta-Analysis of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Substance and Food Craving: What Effect Do Modulators Have?
title_fullStr A Meta-Analysis of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Substance and Food Craving: What Effect Do Modulators Have?
title_full_unstemmed A Meta-Analysis of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Substance and Food Craving: What Effect Do Modulators Have?
title_short A Meta-Analysis of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Substance and Food Craving: What Effect Do Modulators Have?
title_sort meta-analysis of transcranial direct current stimulation on substance and food craving: what effect do modulators have?
topic Psychiatry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7332543/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32670118
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00598
work_keys_str_mv AT chenjiasi ametaanalysisoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationonsubstanceandfoodcravingwhateffectdomodulatorshave
AT qinjingmin ametaanalysisoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationonsubstanceandfoodcravingwhateffectdomodulatorshave
AT heqinghua ametaanalysisoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationonsubstanceandfoodcravingwhateffectdomodulatorshave
AT zouzhiling ametaanalysisoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationonsubstanceandfoodcravingwhateffectdomodulatorshave
AT chenjiasi metaanalysisoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationonsubstanceandfoodcravingwhateffectdomodulatorshave
AT qinjingmin metaanalysisoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationonsubstanceandfoodcravingwhateffectdomodulatorshave
AT heqinghua metaanalysisoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationonsubstanceandfoodcravingwhateffectdomodulatorshave
AT zouzhiling metaanalysisoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationonsubstanceandfoodcravingwhateffectdomodulatorshave