Cargando…

Real-world experience with pro re nata dosing of intravitreal dexamethasone implant for eyes with refractory diabetic macular edema

Aims: To evaluate treatment outcomes of pro re nata dosing of intravitreal dexamethasone implant in eyes with refractory diabetic macular edema (DME) amongst Indian subjects. Methods and material: Retrospective, interventional case series. Medical records of 28 eyes of 23 patients with refractory DM...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rishi, Pukhraj, Rishi, Ekta, Attiku, Yamini, Dhami, Abhinav, Iyer, Vandana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7332721/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32676266
http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/oc000148
_version_ 1783553580819546112
author Rishi, Pukhraj
Rishi, Ekta
Attiku, Yamini
Dhami, Abhinav
Iyer, Vandana
author_facet Rishi, Pukhraj
Rishi, Ekta
Attiku, Yamini
Dhami, Abhinav
Iyer, Vandana
author_sort Rishi, Pukhraj
collection PubMed
description Aims: To evaluate treatment outcomes of pro re nata dosing of intravitreal dexamethasone implant in eyes with refractory diabetic macular edema (DME) amongst Indian subjects. Methods and material: Retrospective, interventional case series. Medical records of 28 eyes of 23 patients with refractory DME who underwent intravitreal dexamethasone (700 µ) implant were reviewed. Paired t-test was carried out to measure mean change in the parameters evaluated. Mann-Whitney U test and Fisher’s exact t-test were done to explore differences between groups receiving single or multiple injections. Results: Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) at baseline were 0.85 (±0.44) and 612 µm (±123), respectively. Mean CMT over 6 months (measured monthly) following injection was 340±119 µm (p=0.001), 346±150 µm (p=0.02), 368±169 µm (p=0.02), 304±174 µm (p=0.001), 525±216 µm (p=0.94) and 532±201 µm (p=0.46), respectively. Mean BCVA at each month following injection was 0.68±0.36 (p=0.02), 0.75±0.45 (p=0.42), 0.55±0.40 (p=0.11), 0.63±0.40 (p=0.12), 0.78±0.30 (p=0.90) and 0.60±0.47 (p=0.92), respectively. Mean follow-up was 12 months (range: 6–33 months). Mean BCVA and CMT at mean 12 months were 0.72±0.46 (p=0.10) and 358 µm±189 (p=0.0001), respectively. Seven eyes had raised IOP; five eyes required cataract extraction. Conclusions: Intravitreal dexamethasone implant is effective in treatment of refractory DME. However, its therapeutic effect lasts for about 4 months.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7332721
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher German Medical Science GMS Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73327212020-07-15 Real-world experience with pro re nata dosing of intravitreal dexamethasone implant for eyes with refractory diabetic macular edema Rishi, Pukhraj Rishi, Ekta Attiku, Yamini Dhami, Abhinav Iyer, Vandana GMS Ophthalmol Cases Article Aims: To evaluate treatment outcomes of pro re nata dosing of intravitreal dexamethasone implant in eyes with refractory diabetic macular edema (DME) amongst Indian subjects. Methods and material: Retrospective, interventional case series. Medical records of 28 eyes of 23 patients with refractory DME who underwent intravitreal dexamethasone (700 µ) implant were reviewed. Paired t-test was carried out to measure mean change in the parameters evaluated. Mann-Whitney U test and Fisher’s exact t-test were done to explore differences between groups receiving single or multiple injections. Results: Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) at baseline were 0.85 (±0.44) and 612 µm (±123), respectively. Mean CMT over 6 months (measured monthly) following injection was 340±119 µm (p=0.001), 346±150 µm (p=0.02), 368±169 µm (p=0.02), 304±174 µm (p=0.001), 525±216 µm (p=0.94) and 532±201 µm (p=0.46), respectively. Mean BCVA at each month following injection was 0.68±0.36 (p=0.02), 0.75±0.45 (p=0.42), 0.55±0.40 (p=0.11), 0.63±0.40 (p=0.12), 0.78±0.30 (p=0.90) and 0.60±0.47 (p=0.92), respectively. Mean follow-up was 12 months (range: 6–33 months). Mean BCVA and CMT at mean 12 months were 0.72±0.46 (p=0.10) and 358 µm±189 (p=0.0001), respectively. Seven eyes had raised IOP; five eyes required cataract extraction. Conclusions: Intravitreal dexamethasone implant is effective in treatment of refractory DME. However, its therapeutic effect lasts for about 4 months. German Medical Science GMS Publishing House 2020-04-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7332721/ /pubmed/32676266 http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/oc000148 Text en Copyright © 2020 Rishi et al. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. See license information at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Rishi, Pukhraj
Rishi, Ekta
Attiku, Yamini
Dhami, Abhinav
Iyer, Vandana
Real-world experience with pro re nata dosing of intravitreal dexamethasone implant for eyes with refractory diabetic macular edema
title Real-world experience with pro re nata dosing of intravitreal dexamethasone implant for eyes with refractory diabetic macular edema
title_full Real-world experience with pro re nata dosing of intravitreal dexamethasone implant for eyes with refractory diabetic macular edema
title_fullStr Real-world experience with pro re nata dosing of intravitreal dexamethasone implant for eyes with refractory diabetic macular edema
title_full_unstemmed Real-world experience with pro re nata dosing of intravitreal dexamethasone implant for eyes with refractory diabetic macular edema
title_short Real-world experience with pro re nata dosing of intravitreal dexamethasone implant for eyes with refractory diabetic macular edema
title_sort real-world experience with pro re nata dosing of intravitreal dexamethasone implant for eyes with refractory diabetic macular edema
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7332721/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32676266
http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/oc000148
work_keys_str_mv AT rishipukhraj realworldexperiencewithprorenatadosingofintravitrealdexamethasoneimplantforeyeswithrefractorydiabeticmacularedema
AT rishiekta realworldexperiencewithprorenatadosingofintravitrealdexamethasoneimplantforeyeswithrefractorydiabeticmacularedema
AT attikuyamini realworldexperiencewithprorenatadosingofintravitrealdexamethasoneimplantforeyeswithrefractorydiabeticmacularedema
AT dhamiabhinav realworldexperiencewithprorenatadosingofintravitrealdexamethasoneimplantforeyeswithrefractorydiabeticmacularedema
AT iyervandana realworldexperiencewithprorenatadosingofintravitrealdexamethasoneimplantforeyeswithrefractorydiabeticmacularedema