Cargando…
Menstrual Cycle Effects on Exercise-Induced Fatigability
Estrogen and progesterone have distinct concentrations across the menstrual cycle, each one promoting several physiological alterations other than preparing the uterus for pregnancy. Whether these physiological alterations can influence motor output during a fatiguing contraction is the goal of this...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7332750/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32670076 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2020.00517 |
_version_ | 1783553588160626688 |
---|---|
author | Pereira, Hugo M. Larson, Rebecca D. Bemben, Debra A. |
author_facet | Pereira, Hugo M. Larson, Rebecca D. Bemben, Debra A. |
author_sort | Pereira, Hugo M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Estrogen and progesterone have distinct concentrations across the menstrual cycle, each one promoting several physiological alterations other than preparing the uterus for pregnancy. Whether these physiological alterations can influence motor output during a fatiguing contraction is the goal of this review, with an emphasis on the obtained effect sizes. Studies on this topic frequently attempt to report if there is a statistically significant difference in fatigability between the follicular and luteal phases of the menstrual cycle. Although the significant difference (the P-value) can inform the probability of the event, it does not indicate the magnitude of it. We also investigated whether the type of task performed (e.g., isometric vs. dynamic) can further influence the magnitude by which exercise-induced fatigue changes with fluctuations in the concentration of ovarian hormones. We retrieved experimental studies in eumenorrheic women published between 1975 and 2019. The initial search yielded 921 studies, and after manual refinement, 46 experimental studies that reported metrics of motor output in both the follicular and luteal phases of the menstrual cycle were included. From these retrieved studies, 15 showed a statistical difference between the luteal and follicular phases (seven showing less fatigability during the luteal phase and eight during the follicular phase). The effect size was not consistent across studies and with a large range (-6.77; 1.61, favoring the luteal and follicular phase, respectively). The inconsistencies across studies may be a consequence of the differences in the limb used during the fatiguing contraction (upper vs. lower extremity), the type of contraction (isometric vs. dynamic), the muscle mass engaged (single limb vs. full body), and the techniques used to define the menstrual cycle phase (e.g., serum concentration vs. reported day of menses). Further studies are required to determine the effects of a regular menstrual cycle phase on the exercise-induced fatigability. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7332750 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73327502020-07-14 Menstrual Cycle Effects on Exercise-Induced Fatigability Pereira, Hugo M. Larson, Rebecca D. Bemben, Debra A. Front Physiol Physiology Estrogen and progesterone have distinct concentrations across the menstrual cycle, each one promoting several physiological alterations other than preparing the uterus for pregnancy. Whether these physiological alterations can influence motor output during a fatiguing contraction is the goal of this review, with an emphasis on the obtained effect sizes. Studies on this topic frequently attempt to report if there is a statistically significant difference in fatigability between the follicular and luteal phases of the menstrual cycle. Although the significant difference (the P-value) can inform the probability of the event, it does not indicate the magnitude of it. We also investigated whether the type of task performed (e.g., isometric vs. dynamic) can further influence the magnitude by which exercise-induced fatigue changes with fluctuations in the concentration of ovarian hormones. We retrieved experimental studies in eumenorrheic women published between 1975 and 2019. The initial search yielded 921 studies, and after manual refinement, 46 experimental studies that reported metrics of motor output in both the follicular and luteal phases of the menstrual cycle were included. From these retrieved studies, 15 showed a statistical difference between the luteal and follicular phases (seven showing less fatigability during the luteal phase and eight during the follicular phase). The effect size was not consistent across studies and with a large range (-6.77; 1.61, favoring the luteal and follicular phase, respectively). The inconsistencies across studies may be a consequence of the differences in the limb used during the fatiguing contraction (upper vs. lower extremity), the type of contraction (isometric vs. dynamic), the muscle mass engaged (single limb vs. full body), and the techniques used to define the menstrual cycle phase (e.g., serum concentration vs. reported day of menses). Further studies are required to determine the effects of a regular menstrual cycle phase on the exercise-induced fatigability. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7332750/ /pubmed/32670076 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2020.00517 Text en Copyright © 2020 Pereira, Larson and Bemben. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Physiology Pereira, Hugo M. Larson, Rebecca D. Bemben, Debra A. Menstrual Cycle Effects on Exercise-Induced Fatigability |
title | Menstrual Cycle Effects on Exercise-Induced Fatigability |
title_full | Menstrual Cycle Effects on Exercise-Induced Fatigability |
title_fullStr | Menstrual Cycle Effects on Exercise-Induced Fatigability |
title_full_unstemmed | Menstrual Cycle Effects on Exercise-Induced Fatigability |
title_short | Menstrual Cycle Effects on Exercise-Induced Fatigability |
title_sort | menstrual cycle effects on exercise-induced fatigability |
topic | Physiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7332750/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32670076 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2020.00517 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pereirahugom menstrualcycleeffectsonexerciseinducedfatigability AT larsonrebeccad menstrualcycleeffectsonexerciseinducedfatigability AT bembendebraa menstrualcycleeffectsonexerciseinducedfatigability |