Cargando…
A Review of Genomic Models for the Analysis of Livestock Crossbred Data
Livestock breeding has shifted during the past decade toward genomic selection. For the estimation of breeding values in purebred breeding schemes, genomic best linear unbiased prediction has become the method of choice. Systematic crossbreeding with the aim to utilize heterosis and breed complement...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7332767/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32670349 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2020.00568 |
_version_ | 1783553598426185728 |
---|---|
author | Stock, Joana Bennewitz, Jörn Hinrichs, Dirk Wellmann, Robin |
author_facet | Stock, Joana Bennewitz, Jörn Hinrichs, Dirk Wellmann, Robin |
author_sort | Stock, Joana |
collection | PubMed |
description | Livestock breeding has shifted during the past decade toward genomic selection. For the estimation of breeding values in purebred breeding schemes, genomic best linear unbiased prediction has become the method of choice. Systematic crossbreeding with the aim to utilize heterosis and breed complementary effects is widely used in livestock breeding, especially in pig and poultry breeding. The goal is to improve the performance of the crossbred animals. Due to genotype-by-environment interactions, imperfect linkage disequilibrium, and the existence of dominance and imprinting, purebred and crossbred performances are not perfectly correlated. Hence, more complex genomic models are required for crossbred populations. This study reviews and compares such models. Compared to purebred genomic models, the reviewed models were of much higher complexity due to the inclusion of dominance effects, breed-specific effects, imprinting effects, and the joint evaluation of purebred and crossbred performance data. With the model assessment work conducted until now, it is not possible to come to a clear recommendation as to which existing method is most suitable for a specific breeding program and a specific genetic trait architecture. Since it is expected that a superior method includes all the different genetic effects in a single model, a dominance model with imprinting and breed-specific SNP effects is proposed. Further progress could be made by assuming realistic covariance structures between the genetic effects of the different breeding lines, and by using larger marker panels and mixture distributions for the SNP effects. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7332767 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73327672020-07-14 A Review of Genomic Models for the Analysis of Livestock Crossbred Data Stock, Joana Bennewitz, Jörn Hinrichs, Dirk Wellmann, Robin Front Genet Genetics Livestock breeding has shifted during the past decade toward genomic selection. For the estimation of breeding values in purebred breeding schemes, genomic best linear unbiased prediction has become the method of choice. Systematic crossbreeding with the aim to utilize heterosis and breed complementary effects is widely used in livestock breeding, especially in pig and poultry breeding. The goal is to improve the performance of the crossbred animals. Due to genotype-by-environment interactions, imperfect linkage disequilibrium, and the existence of dominance and imprinting, purebred and crossbred performances are not perfectly correlated. Hence, more complex genomic models are required for crossbred populations. This study reviews and compares such models. Compared to purebred genomic models, the reviewed models were of much higher complexity due to the inclusion of dominance effects, breed-specific effects, imprinting effects, and the joint evaluation of purebred and crossbred performance data. With the model assessment work conducted until now, it is not possible to come to a clear recommendation as to which existing method is most suitable for a specific breeding program and a specific genetic trait architecture. Since it is expected that a superior method includes all the different genetic effects in a single model, a dominance model with imprinting and breed-specific SNP effects is proposed. Further progress could be made by assuming realistic covariance structures between the genetic effects of the different breeding lines, and by using larger marker panels and mixture distributions for the SNP effects. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7332767/ /pubmed/32670349 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2020.00568 Text en Copyright © 2020 Stock, Bennewitz, Hinrichs and Wellmann. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Genetics Stock, Joana Bennewitz, Jörn Hinrichs, Dirk Wellmann, Robin A Review of Genomic Models for the Analysis of Livestock Crossbred Data |
title | A Review of Genomic Models for the Analysis of Livestock Crossbred Data |
title_full | A Review of Genomic Models for the Analysis of Livestock Crossbred Data |
title_fullStr | A Review of Genomic Models for the Analysis of Livestock Crossbred Data |
title_full_unstemmed | A Review of Genomic Models for the Analysis of Livestock Crossbred Data |
title_short | A Review of Genomic Models for the Analysis of Livestock Crossbred Data |
title_sort | review of genomic models for the analysis of livestock crossbred data |
topic | Genetics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7332767/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32670349 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2020.00568 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stockjoana areviewofgenomicmodelsfortheanalysisoflivestockcrossbreddata AT bennewitzjorn areviewofgenomicmodelsfortheanalysisoflivestockcrossbreddata AT hinrichsdirk areviewofgenomicmodelsfortheanalysisoflivestockcrossbreddata AT wellmannrobin areviewofgenomicmodelsfortheanalysisoflivestockcrossbreddata AT stockjoana reviewofgenomicmodelsfortheanalysisoflivestockcrossbreddata AT bennewitzjorn reviewofgenomicmodelsfortheanalysisoflivestockcrossbreddata AT hinrichsdirk reviewofgenomicmodelsfortheanalysisoflivestockcrossbreddata AT wellmannrobin reviewofgenomicmodelsfortheanalysisoflivestockcrossbreddata |