Cargando…
Vasopressors in septic shock: which, when, and how much?
In addition to fluid resuscitation, the vasopressor therapy is a fundamental treatment of septic shock-induced hypotension as it aims at correcting the vascular tone depression and then at improving organ perfusion pressure. Experts’ recommendations currently position norepinephrine (NE) as the firs...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AME Publishing Company
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7333107/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32647719 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm.2020.04.24 |
_version_ | 1783553680637689856 |
---|---|
author | Shi, Rui Hamzaoui, Olfa De Vita, Nello Monnet, Xavier Teboul, Jean-Louis |
author_facet | Shi, Rui Hamzaoui, Olfa De Vita, Nello Monnet, Xavier Teboul, Jean-Louis |
author_sort | Shi, Rui |
collection | PubMed |
description | In addition to fluid resuscitation, the vasopressor therapy is a fundamental treatment of septic shock-induced hypotension as it aims at correcting the vascular tone depression and then at improving organ perfusion pressure. Experts’ recommendations currently position norepinephrine (NE) as the first-line vasopressor in septic shock. Vasopressin and its analogues are only second-line vasopressors as strong recent evidence suggests no benefit of their early administration in spite of promising preliminary data. Early administration of NE may allow achieving the initial mean arterial pressure (MAP) target faster and reducing the risk of fluid overload. The diastolic arterial pressure (DAP) as a marker of vascular tone, helps identifying the patients who need NE urgently. Available data suggest a MAP of 65 mmHg as the initial target but a more individualized approach is often required depending on several factors such as history of chronic hypertension or value of central venous pressure (CVP). In cases of refractory hypotension, increasing NE up to doses ≥1 µg/kg/min could be an option. However, current experts’ guidelines suggest to combine NE with other vasopressors such as vasopressin, with the intent to rising the MAP to target or to decrease the NE dosage. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7333107 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | AME Publishing Company |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73331072020-07-08 Vasopressors in septic shock: which, when, and how much? Shi, Rui Hamzaoui, Olfa De Vita, Nello Monnet, Xavier Teboul, Jean-Louis Ann Transl Med Review Article on Hemodynamic Monitoring in Critically Ill Patients In addition to fluid resuscitation, the vasopressor therapy is a fundamental treatment of septic shock-induced hypotension as it aims at correcting the vascular tone depression and then at improving organ perfusion pressure. Experts’ recommendations currently position norepinephrine (NE) as the first-line vasopressor in septic shock. Vasopressin and its analogues are only second-line vasopressors as strong recent evidence suggests no benefit of their early administration in spite of promising preliminary data. Early administration of NE may allow achieving the initial mean arterial pressure (MAP) target faster and reducing the risk of fluid overload. The diastolic arterial pressure (DAP) as a marker of vascular tone, helps identifying the patients who need NE urgently. Available data suggest a MAP of 65 mmHg as the initial target but a more individualized approach is often required depending on several factors such as history of chronic hypertension or value of central venous pressure (CVP). In cases of refractory hypotension, increasing NE up to doses ≥1 µg/kg/min could be an option. However, current experts’ guidelines suggest to combine NE with other vasopressors such as vasopressin, with the intent to rising the MAP to target or to decrease the NE dosage. AME Publishing Company 2020-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7333107/ /pubmed/32647719 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm.2020.04.24 Text en 2020 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Article on Hemodynamic Monitoring in Critically Ill Patients Shi, Rui Hamzaoui, Olfa De Vita, Nello Monnet, Xavier Teboul, Jean-Louis Vasopressors in septic shock: which, when, and how much? |
title | Vasopressors in septic shock: which, when, and how much? |
title_full | Vasopressors in septic shock: which, when, and how much? |
title_fullStr | Vasopressors in septic shock: which, when, and how much? |
title_full_unstemmed | Vasopressors in septic shock: which, when, and how much? |
title_short | Vasopressors in septic shock: which, when, and how much? |
title_sort | vasopressors in septic shock: which, when, and how much? |
topic | Review Article on Hemodynamic Monitoring in Critically Ill Patients |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7333107/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32647719 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm.2020.04.24 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shirui vasopressorsinsepticshockwhichwhenandhowmuch AT hamzaouiolfa vasopressorsinsepticshockwhichwhenandhowmuch AT devitanello vasopressorsinsepticshockwhichwhenandhowmuch AT monnetxavier vasopressorsinsepticshockwhichwhenandhowmuch AT tebouljeanlouis vasopressorsinsepticshockwhichwhenandhowmuch |