Cargando…

Prediction of fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients

In patients with acute circulatory failure, the primary goal of volume expansion is to increase cardiac output. However, this expected effect is inconstant, so that in many instances, fluid administration does not result in any haemodynamic benefit. In such cases, fluid could only exert some deleter...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Monnet, Xavier, Teboul, Jean-Louis
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7333112/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32647715
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-2020-hdm-18
_version_ 1783553681822580736
author Monnet, Xavier
Teboul, Jean-Louis
author_facet Monnet, Xavier
Teboul, Jean-Louis
author_sort Monnet, Xavier
collection PubMed
description In patients with acute circulatory failure, the primary goal of volume expansion is to increase cardiac output. However, this expected effect is inconstant, so that in many instances, fluid administration does not result in any haemodynamic benefit. In such cases, fluid could only exert some deleterious effects. It is now well demonstrated that excessive fluid administration is harmful, especially during acute respiratory distress syndrome and in sepsis or septic shock. This is the reason why some tests and indices have been developed in order to assess “fluid responsiveness” before deciding to perform volume expansion. While preload markers have been used for many years for this purpose, they have been repeatedly shown to be unreliable, which is mainly related to physiological issues. As alternatives, “dynamic” indices have been introduced. These indices are based upon the changes in cardiac output or stroke volume resulting from various changes in preload conditions, induced by heart-lung interactions, postural manoeuvres or by the infusion of small amounts of fluids. The haemodynamic effects and the reliability of these “dynamic” indices of fluid responsiveness are now well described. From their respective advantages and limitations, it is also possible to describe their clinical interest and the clinical setting in which they are applicable.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7333112
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73331122020-07-08 Prediction of fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients Monnet, Xavier Teboul, Jean-Louis Ann Transl Med Review Article on Hemodynamic Monitoring in Critically Ill Patients In patients with acute circulatory failure, the primary goal of volume expansion is to increase cardiac output. However, this expected effect is inconstant, so that in many instances, fluid administration does not result in any haemodynamic benefit. In such cases, fluid could only exert some deleterious effects. It is now well demonstrated that excessive fluid administration is harmful, especially during acute respiratory distress syndrome and in sepsis or septic shock. This is the reason why some tests and indices have been developed in order to assess “fluid responsiveness” before deciding to perform volume expansion. While preload markers have been used for many years for this purpose, they have been repeatedly shown to be unreliable, which is mainly related to physiological issues. As alternatives, “dynamic” indices have been introduced. These indices are based upon the changes in cardiac output or stroke volume resulting from various changes in preload conditions, induced by heart-lung interactions, postural manoeuvres or by the infusion of small amounts of fluids. The haemodynamic effects and the reliability of these “dynamic” indices of fluid responsiveness are now well described. From their respective advantages and limitations, it is also possible to describe their clinical interest and the clinical setting in which they are applicable. AME Publishing Company 2020-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7333112/ /pubmed/32647715 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-2020-hdm-18 Text en 2020 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review Article on Hemodynamic Monitoring in Critically Ill Patients
Monnet, Xavier
Teboul, Jean-Louis
Prediction of fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients
title Prediction of fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients
title_full Prediction of fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients
title_fullStr Prediction of fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients
title_full_unstemmed Prediction of fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients
title_short Prediction of fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients
title_sort prediction of fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients
topic Review Article on Hemodynamic Monitoring in Critically Ill Patients
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7333112/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32647715
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-2020-hdm-18
work_keys_str_mv AT monnetxavier predictionoffluidresponsivenessinspontaneouslybreathingpatients
AT tebouljeanlouis predictionoffluidresponsivenessinspontaneouslybreathingpatients