Cargando…
Prediction of fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients
In patients with acute circulatory failure, the primary goal of volume expansion is to increase cardiac output. However, this expected effect is inconstant, so that in many instances, fluid administration does not result in any haemodynamic benefit. In such cases, fluid could only exert some deleter...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AME Publishing Company
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7333112/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32647715 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-2020-hdm-18 |
_version_ | 1783553681822580736 |
---|---|
author | Monnet, Xavier Teboul, Jean-Louis |
author_facet | Monnet, Xavier Teboul, Jean-Louis |
author_sort | Monnet, Xavier |
collection | PubMed |
description | In patients with acute circulatory failure, the primary goal of volume expansion is to increase cardiac output. However, this expected effect is inconstant, so that in many instances, fluid administration does not result in any haemodynamic benefit. In such cases, fluid could only exert some deleterious effects. It is now well demonstrated that excessive fluid administration is harmful, especially during acute respiratory distress syndrome and in sepsis or septic shock. This is the reason why some tests and indices have been developed in order to assess “fluid responsiveness” before deciding to perform volume expansion. While preload markers have been used for many years for this purpose, they have been repeatedly shown to be unreliable, which is mainly related to physiological issues. As alternatives, “dynamic” indices have been introduced. These indices are based upon the changes in cardiac output or stroke volume resulting from various changes in preload conditions, induced by heart-lung interactions, postural manoeuvres or by the infusion of small amounts of fluids. The haemodynamic effects and the reliability of these “dynamic” indices of fluid responsiveness are now well described. From their respective advantages and limitations, it is also possible to describe their clinical interest and the clinical setting in which they are applicable. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7333112 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | AME Publishing Company |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73331122020-07-08 Prediction of fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients Monnet, Xavier Teboul, Jean-Louis Ann Transl Med Review Article on Hemodynamic Monitoring in Critically Ill Patients In patients with acute circulatory failure, the primary goal of volume expansion is to increase cardiac output. However, this expected effect is inconstant, so that in many instances, fluid administration does not result in any haemodynamic benefit. In such cases, fluid could only exert some deleterious effects. It is now well demonstrated that excessive fluid administration is harmful, especially during acute respiratory distress syndrome and in sepsis or septic shock. This is the reason why some tests and indices have been developed in order to assess “fluid responsiveness” before deciding to perform volume expansion. While preload markers have been used for many years for this purpose, they have been repeatedly shown to be unreliable, which is mainly related to physiological issues. As alternatives, “dynamic” indices have been introduced. These indices are based upon the changes in cardiac output or stroke volume resulting from various changes in preload conditions, induced by heart-lung interactions, postural manoeuvres or by the infusion of small amounts of fluids. The haemodynamic effects and the reliability of these “dynamic” indices of fluid responsiveness are now well described. From their respective advantages and limitations, it is also possible to describe their clinical interest and the clinical setting in which they are applicable. AME Publishing Company 2020-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7333112/ /pubmed/32647715 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-2020-hdm-18 Text en 2020 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Article on Hemodynamic Monitoring in Critically Ill Patients Monnet, Xavier Teboul, Jean-Louis Prediction of fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients |
title | Prediction of fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients |
title_full | Prediction of fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients |
title_fullStr | Prediction of fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Prediction of fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients |
title_short | Prediction of fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients |
title_sort | prediction of fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients |
topic | Review Article on Hemodynamic Monitoring in Critically Ill Patients |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7333112/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32647715 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-2020-hdm-18 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT monnetxavier predictionoffluidresponsivenessinspontaneouslybreathingpatients AT tebouljeanlouis predictionoffluidresponsivenessinspontaneouslybreathingpatients |