Cargando…
Assessment of sublingual microcirculation in critically ill patients: consensus and debate
The main concern in shock and resuscitation is whether the microcirculation can carry adequate oxygen to the tissues and remove waste. Identification of an intact coherence between macro- and microcirculation during states of shock and resuscitation shows a functioning regulatory mechanism. However,...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AME Publishing Company
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7333125/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32647718 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm.2020.03.222 |
_version_ | 1783553685022834688 |
---|---|
author | Dilken, Olcay Ergin, Bulent Ince, Can |
author_facet | Dilken, Olcay Ergin, Bulent Ince, Can |
author_sort | Dilken, Olcay |
collection | PubMed |
description | The main concern in shock and resuscitation is whether the microcirculation can carry adequate oxygen to the tissues and remove waste. Identification of an intact coherence between macro- and microcirculation during states of shock and resuscitation shows a functioning regulatory mechanism. However, loss of hemodynamic coherence between the macro and microcirculation can be encountered frequently in sepsis, cardiogenic shock, or any hemodynamically compromised patient. This loss of hemodynamic coherence results in an improvement in macrohemodynamic parameters following resuscitation without a parallel improvement in microcirculation resulting in tissue hypoxia and tissue compromise. Hand-held vital microscopes (HVMs) can visualize the microcirculation and help to diagnose the nature of microcirculatory shock. Although treatment with the sole aim of recruiting the microcirculation is as yet not realized, interventions can be tailored to the needs of the patient while monitoring sublingual microcirculation. With the help of the newly introduced software, called MicroTools, we believe sublingual microcirculation monitoring and diagnosis will be an essential point-of-care tool in managing shock patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7333125 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | AME Publishing Company |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73331252020-07-08 Assessment of sublingual microcirculation in critically ill patients: consensus and debate Dilken, Olcay Ergin, Bulent Ince, Can Ann Transl Med Review Article on Hemodynamic Monitoring in Critically Ill Patients The main concern in shock and resuscitation is whether the microcirculation can carry adequate oxygen to the tissues and remove waste. Identification of an intact coherence between macro- and microcirculation during states of shock and resuscitation shows a functioning regulatory mechanism. However, loss of hemodynamic coherence between the macro and microcirculation can be encountered frequently in sepsis, cardiogenic shock, or any hemodynamically compromised patient. This loss of hemodynamic coherence results in an improvement in macrohemodynamic parameters following resuscitation without a parallel improvement in microcirculation resulting in tissue hypoxia and tissue compromise. Hand-held vital microscopes (HVMs) can visualize the microcirculation and help to diagnose the nature of microcirculatory shock. Although treatment with the sole aim of recruiting the microcirculation is as yet not realized, interventions can be tailored to the needs of the patient while monitoring sublingual microcirculation. With the help of the newly introduced software, called MicroTools, we believe sublingual microcirculation monitoring and diagnosis will be an essential point-of-care tool in managing shock patients. AME Publishing Company 2020-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7333125/ /pubmed/32647718 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm.2020.03.222 Text en 2020 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Article on Hemodynamic Monitoring in Critically Ill Patients Dilken, Olcay Ergin, Bulent Ince, Can Assessment of sublingual microcirculation in critically ill patients: consensus and debate |
title | Assessment of sublingual microcirculation in critically ill patients: consensus and debate |
title_full | Assessment of sublingual microcirculation in critically ill patients: consensus and debate |
title_fullStr | Assessment of sublingual microcirculation in critically ill patients: consensus and debate |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessment of sublingual microcirculation in critically ill patients: consensus and debate |
title_short | Assessment of sublingual microcirculation in critically ill patients: consensus and debate |
title_sort | assessment of sublingual microcirculation in critically ill patients: consensus and debate |
topic | Review Article on Hemodynamic Monitoring in Critically Ill Patients |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7333125/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32647718 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm.2020.03.222 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dilkenolcay assessmentofsublingualmicrocirculationincriticallyillpatientsconsensusanddebate AT erginbulent assessmentofsublingualmicrocirculationincriticallyillpatientsconsensusanddebate AT incecan assessmentofsublingualmicrocirculationincriticallyillpatientsconsensusanddebate |