Cargando…

Sex-Based Differences in Optimal Tunnel Placement for Acromioclavicular Joint Reconstruction

BACKGROUND: Tunnel placement is important for outcomes after acromioclavicular (AC) joint reconstruction, yet little has been written on sex-based differences in optimal tunnel positioning. HYPOTHESIS: No sex-based or anatomic differences will be found in ideal tunnel position based on radiographic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Benavent, Kyra A., Zhang, Dafang, Matzkin, Elizabeth G., Earp, Brandon E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7333500/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32656283
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967119893276
_version_ 1783553766799179776
author Benavent, Kyra A.
Zhang, Dafang
Matzkin, Elizabeth G.
Earp, Brandon E.
author_facet Benavent, Kyra A.
Zhang, Dafang
Matzkin, Elizabeth G.
Earp, Brandon E.
author_sort Benavent, Kyra A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Tunnel placement is important for outcomes after acromioclavicular (AC) joint reconstruction, yet little has been written on sex-based differences in optimal tunnel positioning. HYPOTHESIS: No sex-based or anatomic differences will be found in ideal tunnel position based on radiographic measurements. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: The records of 2382 patients were retrospectively examined for clavicle radiographs over a 20-year period. A random set of radiographs were reviewed until 200 radiographs from each sex met inclusion criteria per a priori power analysis. Anteroposterior clavicle radiographs were used to collect (1) length from lateral clavicle to lateral coracoid (LCLC), (2) length from lateral clavicle to medial coracoid (LCMC), (3) clavicle length (CL), and (4) clavicular depth at the midcoracoid (MCCD). The Student t test was used to compare differences between male and female patients. The Pearson correlation coefficient was used to measure linear correlations. Variables with a P < .1 were included in a multiple regression model. RESULTS: The cohort included 200 men and 200 women. LCLC and LCMC were significantly greater for men than for women (P < .0001). Clavicle length was significantly correlated with LCLC (r = 0.63; P < .0001) and LCMC (r = 0.74; P < .0001). MCCD was significantly correlated with LCLC (r = 0.32; P < .0001) and LCMC (r = 0.43; P < .0001). The approximate placement for the trapezoid tunnel was found to be 22.1 mm in women and 26.6 mm in men. The approximate placement for the conoid tunnel was found to be 40 mm in women and 46.6 mm in men. The ratios (LCLC:CL and LCMC:CL) were also significantly different between female and male patients. The LCLC:CL was 0.144 in women and 0.154 in men (P < .0001). The LCMC:CL was 0.261 in women and 0.271 in men (P < .0006). CONCLUSION: Significant sex-based differences are found in the position of the coracoid relative to the lateral edge of the clavicle. Coracoid position relative to the lateral edge of the clavicle is correlated with anatomic parameters, most strongly with clavicle length.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7333500
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73335002020-07-10 Sex-Based Differences in Optimal Tunnel Placement for Acromioclavicular Joint Reconstruction Benavent, Kyra A. Zhang, Dafang Matzkin, Elizabeth G. Earp, Brandon E. Orthop J Sports Med Article BACKGROUND: Tunnel placement is important for outcomes after acromioclavicular (AC) joint reconstruction, yet little has been written on sex-based differences in optimal tunnel positioning. HYPOTHESIS: No sex-based or anatomic differences will be found in ideal tunnel position based on radiographic measurements. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: The records of 2382 patients were retrospectively examined for clavicle radiographs over a 20-year period. A random set of radiographs were reviewed until 200 radiographs from each sex met inclusion criteria per a priori power analysis. Anteroposterior clavicle radiographs were used to collect (1) length from lateral clavicle to lateral coracoid (LCLC), (2) length from lateral clavicle to medial coracoid (LCMC), (3) clavicle length (CL), and (4) clavicular depth at the midcoracoid (MCCD). The Student t test was used to compare differences between male and female patients. The Pearson correlation coefficient was used to measure linear correlations. Variables with a P < .1 were included in a multiple regression model. RESULTS: The cohort included 200 men and 200 women. LCLC and LCMC were significantly greater for men than for women (P < .0001). Clavicle length was significantly correlated with LCLC (r = 0.63; P < .0001) and LCMC (r = 0.74; P < .0001). MCCD was significantly correlated with LCLC (r = 0.32; P < .0001) and LCMC (r = 0.43; P < .0001). The approximate placement for the trapezoid tunnel was found to be 22.1 mm in women and 26.6 mm in men. The approximate placement for the conoid tunnel was found to be 40 mm in women and 46.6 mm in men. The ratios (LCLC:CL and LCMC:CL) were also significantly different between female and male patients. The LCLC:CL was 0.144 in women and 0.154 in men (P < .0001). The LCMC:CL was 0.261 in women and 0.271 in men (P < .0006). CONCLUSION: Significant sex-based differences are found in the position of the coracoid relative to the lateral edge of the clavicle. Coracoid position relative to the lateral edge of the clavicle is correlated with anatomic parameters, most strongly with clavicle length. SAGE Publications 2020-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7333500/ /pubmed/32656283 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967119893276 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Article
Benavent, Kyra A.
Zhang, Dafang
Matzkin, Elizabeth G.
Earp, Brandon E.
Sex-Based Differences in Optimal Tunnel Placement for Acromioclavicular Joint Reconstruction
title Sex-Based Differences in Optimal Tunnel Placement for Acromioclavicular Joint Reconstruction
title_full Sex-Based Differences in Optimal Tunnel Placement for Acromioclavicular Joint Reconstruction
title_fullStr Sex-Based Differences in Optimal Tunnel Placement for Acromioclavicular Joint Reconstruction
title_full_unstemmed Sex-Based Differences in Optimal Tunnel Placement for Acromioclavicular Joint Reconstruction
title_short Sex-Based Differences in Optimal Tunnel Placement for Acromioclavicular Joint Reconstruction
title_sort sex-based differences in optimal tunnel placement for acromioclavicular joint reconstruction
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7333500/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32656283
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967119893276
work_keys_str_mv AT benaventkyraa sexbaseddifferencesinoptimaltunnelplacementforacromioclavicularjointreconstruction
AT zhangdafang sexbaseddifferencesinoptimaltunnelplacementforacromioclavicularjointreconstruction
AT matzkinelizabethg sexbaseddifferencesinoptimaltunnelplacementforacromioclavicularjointreconstruction
AT earpbrandone sexbaseddifferencesinoptimaltunnelplacementforacromioclavicularjointreconstruction