Cargando…
The Diagnostic Performance of Minimally Invasive Biopsy in Predicting Breast Pathological Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy in Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
Background: Neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) is commonly used in patients with early stage breast cancer before definitive surgery. The standard diagnostic approach for pathologic complete response (pCR) of the breast is breast surgery and pathologic examination. In recent years, several trials in...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7333530/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32676452 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.00933 |
_version_ | 1783553772459393024 |
---|---|
author | Li, Yan Zhou, Yidong Mao, Feng Lin, Yan Zhang, Xiaohui Shen, Songjie Sun, Qiang |
author_facet | Li, Yan Zhou, Yidong Mao, Feng Lin, Yan Zhang, Xiaohui Shen, Songjie Sun, Qiang |
author_sort | Li, Yan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) is commonly used in patients with early stage breast cancer before definitive surgery. The standard diagnostic approach for pathologic complete response (pCR) of the breast is breast surgery and pathologic examination. In recent years, several trials investigated the predictive value of image-guided minimally invasive biopsy (MIB) for breast pCR after NST. This study conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of MIB. Materials and Methods: We identified relevant research reports in online databases through February 2020. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) tool was used to evaluate the quality of included trials. We extracted relevant data and constructed a 2 × 2 contingency table to analyze the predictive accuracy of MIB for breast pCR. Subgroup analyses and meta-regressions were also performed to investigate potential causes of heterogeneity. Results: Nine trials (with 1,030 breast cancer patients) were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of MIB were 0.72 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.61–0.81] and 0.99 (95% CI: 0.89–1.00), respectively. By combining relevant data, there were no significant differences in sensitivity or specificity among different molecular subtypes of breast cancer (P > 0.05). Subgroup analyses and meta-regressions implied that trials with responses not limited to clinical complete response (cCR) had a significantly higher accuracy of MIB than those with only cCR (RDOR: 7.65; 95% CI: 1.05–55.46; P = 0.046). Conclusion: Current image-guided MIB methods are not accurate enough in terms of predicting breast pCR after NST. It is of utmost clinical importance to standardize the MIB procedure and incorporate other factors into the evaluation in order to improve the accuracy to an acceptable level. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7333530 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73335302020-07-15 The Diagnostic Performance of Minimally Invasive Biopsy in Predicting Breast Pathological Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy in Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis Li, Yan Zhou, Yidong Mao, Feng Lin, Yan Zhang, Xiaohui Shen, Songjie Sun, Qiang Front Oncol Oncology Background: Neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) is commonly used in patients with early stage breast cancer before definitive surgery. The standard diagnostic approach for pathologic complete response (pCR) of the breast is breast surgery and pathologic examination. In recent years, several trials investigated the predictive value of image-guided minimally invasive biopsy (MIB) for breast pCR after NST. This study conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of MIB. Materials and Methods: We identified relevant research reports in online databases through February 2020. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) tool was used to evaluate the quality of included trials. We extracted relevant data and constructed a 2 × 2 contingency table to analyze the predictive accuracy of MIB for breast pCR. Subgroup analyses and meta-regressions were also performed to investigate potential causes of heterogeneity. Results: Nine trials (with 1,030 breast cancer patients) were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of MIB were 0.72 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.61–0.81] and 0.99 (95% CI: 0.89–1.00), respectively. By combining relevant data, there were no significant differences in sensitivity or specificity among different molecular subtypes of breast cancer (P > 0.05). Subgroup analyses and meta-regressions implied that trials with responses not limited to clinical complete response (cCR) had a significantly higher accuracy of MIB than those with only cCR (RDOR: 7.65; 95% CI: 1.05–55.46; P = 0.046). Conclusion: Current image-guided MIB methods are not accurate enough in terms of predicting breast pCR after NST. It is of utmost clinical importance to standardize the MIB procedure and incorporate other factors into the evaluation in order to improve the accuracy to an acceptable level. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7333530/ /pubmed/32676452 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.00933 Text en Copyright © 2020 Li, Zhou, Mao, Lin, Zhang, Shen and Sun. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Oncology Li, Yan Zhou, Yidong Mao, Feng Lin, Yan Zhang, Xiaohui Shen, Songjie Sun, Qiang The Diagnostic Performance of Minimally Invasive Biopsy in Predicting Breast Pathological Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy in Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis |
title | The Diagnostic Performance of Minimally Invasive Biopsy in Predicting Breast Pathological Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy in Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis |
title_full | The Diagnostic Performance of Minimally Invasive Biopsy in Predicting Breast Pathological Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy in Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | The Diagnostic Performance of Minimally Invasive Biopsy in Predicting Breast Pathological Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy in Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | The Diagnostic Performance of Minimally Invasive Biopsy in Predicting Breast Pathological Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy in Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis |
title_short | The Diagnostic Performance of Minimally Invasive Biopsy in Predicting Breast Pathological Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy in Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | diagnostic performance of minimally invasive biopsy in predicting breast pathological complete response after neoadjuvant systemic therapy in breast cancer: a meta-analysis |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7333530/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32676452 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.00933 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liyan thediagnosticperformanceofminimallyinvasivebiopsyinpredictingbreastpathologicalcompleteresponseafterneoadjuvantsystemictherapyinbreastcancerametaanalysis AT zhouyidong thediagnosticperformanceofminimallyinvasivebiopsyinpredictingbreastpathologicalcompleteresponseafterneoadjuvantsystemictherapyinbreastcancerametaanalysis AT maofeng thediagnosticperformanceofminimallyinvasivebiopsyinpredictingbreastpathologicalcompleteresponseafterneoadjuvantsystemictherapyinbreastcancerametaanalysis AT linyan thediagnosticperformanceofminimallyinvasivebiopsyinpredictingbreastpathologicalcompleteresponseafterneoadjuvantsystemictherapyinbreastcancerametaanalysis AT zhangxiaohui thediagnosticperformanceofminimallyinvasivebiopsyinpredictingbreastpathologicalcompleteresponseafterneoadjuvantsystemictherapyinbreastcancerametaanalysis AT shensongjie thediagnosticperformanceofminimallyinvasivebiopsyinpredictingbreastpathologicalcompleteresponseafterneoadjuvantsystemictherapyinbreastcancerametaanalysis AT sunqiang thediagnosticperformanceofminimallyinvasivebiopsyinpredictingbreastpathologicalcompleteresponseafterneoadjuvantsystemictherapyinbreastcancerametaanalysis AT liyan diagnosticperformanceofminimallyinvasivebiopsyinpredictingbreastpathologicalcompleteresponseafterneoadjuvantsystemictherapyinbreastcancerametaanalysis AT zhouyidong diagnosticperformanceofminimallyinvasivebiopsyinpredictingbreastpathologicalcompleteresponseafterneoadjuvantsystemictherapyinbreastcancerametaanalysis AT maofeng diagnosticperformanceofminimallyinvasivebiopsyinpredictingbreastpathologicalcompleteresponseafterneoadjuvantsystemictherapyinbreastcancerametaanalysis AT linyan diagnosticperformanceofminimallyinvasivebiopsyinpredictingbreastpathologicalcompleteresponseafterneoadjuvantsystemictherapyinbreastcancerametaanalysis AT zhangxiaohui diagnosticperformanceofminimallyinvasivebiopsyinpredictingbreastpathologicalcompleteresponseafterneoadjuvantsystemictherapyinbreastcancerametaanalysis AT shensongjie diagnosticperformanceofminimallyinvasivebiopsyinpredictingbreastpathologicalcompleteresponseafterneoadjuvantsystemictherapyinbreastcancerametaanalysis AT sunqiang diagnosticperformanceofminimallyinvasivebiopsyinpredictingbreastpathologicalcompleteresponseafterneoadjuvantsystemictherapyinbreastcancerametaanalysis |