Cargando…

Bite force data suggests relationship between acrodont tooth implantation and strong bite force

Extant and extinct reptiles exhibit numerous combinations of tooth implantation and attachment. Tooth implantation ranges from those possessing roots and lying within a socket (thecodonty), to teeth lying against the lingual wall of the jawbone (pleurodonty), to teeth without roots or sockets that a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jenkins, Kelsey M., Shaw, Jack O.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7333653/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32656000
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.9468
_version_ 1783553799794720768
author Jenkins, Kelsey M.
Shaw, Jack O.
author_facet Jenkins, Kelsey M.
Shaw, Jack O.
author_sort Jenkins, Kelsey M.
collection PubMed
description Extant and extinct reptiles exhibit numerous combinations of tooth implantation and attachment. Tooth implantation ranges from those possessing roots and lying within a socket (thecodonty), to teeth lying against the lingual wall of the jawbone (pleurodonty), to teeth without roots or sockets that are attached to the apex of the marginal jawbones (acrodonty). Attachment may be ligamentous (gomphosis) or via fusion (ankylosis). Generally speaking, adaptative reasonings are proposed as an underlying driver for evolutionary changes in some forms of tooth implantation and attachment. However, a substantiated adaptive hypothesis is lacking for the state of acrodont ankylosis that is seen in several lineages of Lepidosauria, a clade that is plesiomorphically pleurodont. The convergent evolution of acrodont ankylosis in several clades of lepidosaurs suggests a selective pressure shaped the evolution of the trait. We hypothesize that acrodont ankylosis as seen in Acrodonta and Sphenodon punctatus, is an adaptation either resulting from or allowing for a stronger bite force. We analyzed bite force data gathered from the literature to show that those taxa possessing acrodont dentition possess a stronger bite force on average than those taxa with pleurodont dentition. Dietary specialists with pleurodont dentition may also possess relatively high bite forces, though body size may also play a role in their ability to bite hard. Furthermore, our results have implications for the evolution of acrodont ankylosis and potential behaviors related to strong bite force that influenced the evolution of acrodonty within Acrodonta and Rhynchocephalia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7333653
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73336532020-07-09 Bite force data suggests relationship between acrodont tooth implantation and strong bite force Jenkins, Kelsey M. Shaw, Jack O. PeerJ Evolutionary Studies Extant and extinct reptiles exhibit numerous combinations of tooth implantation and attachment. Tooth implantation ranges from those possessing roots and lying within a socket (thecodonty), to teeth lying against the lingual wall of the jawbone (pleurodonty), to teeth without roots or sockets that are attached to the apex of the marginal jawbones (acrodonty). Attachment may be ligamentous (gomphosis) or via fusion (ankylosis). Generally speaking, adaptative reasonings are proposed as an underlying driver for evolutionary changes in some forms of tooth implantation and attachment. However, a substantiated adaptive hypothesis is lacking for the state of acrodont ankylosis that is seen in several lineages of Lepidosauria, a clade that is plesiomorphically pleurodont. The convergent evolution of acrodont ankylosis in several clades of lepidosaurs suggests a selective pressure shaped the evolution of the trait. We hypothesize that acrodont ankylosis as seen in Acrodonta and Sphenodon punctatus, is an adaptation either resulting from or allowing for a stronger bite force. We analyzed bite force data gathered from the literature to show that those taxa possessing acrodont dentition possess a stronger bite force on average than those taxa with pleurodont dentition. Dietary specialists with pleurodont dentition may also possess relatively high bite forces, though body size may also play a role in their ability to bite hard. Furthermore, our results have implications for the evolution of acrodont ankylosis and potential behaviors related to strong bite force that influenced the evolution of acrodonty within Acrodonta and Rhynchocephalia. PeerJ Inc. 2020-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7333653/ /pubmed/32656000 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.9468 Text en ©2020 Jenkins and Shaw https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Evolutionary Studies
Jenkins, Kelsey M.
Shaw, Jack O.
Bite force data suggests relationship between acrodont tooth implantation and strong bite force
title Bite force data suggests relationship between acrodont tooth implantation and strong bite force
title_full Bite force data suggests relationship between acrodont tooth implantation and strong bite force
title_fullStr Bite force data suggests relationship between acrodont tooth implantation and strong bite force
title_full_unstemmed Bite force data suggests relationship between acrodont tooth implantation and strong bite force
title_short Bite force data suggests relationship between acrodont tooth implantation and strong bite force
title_sort bite force data suggests relationship between acrodont tooth implantation and strong bite force
topic Evolutionary Studies
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7333653/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32656000
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.9468
work_keys_str_mv AT jenkinskelseym biteforcedatasuggestsrelationshipbetweenacrodonttoothimplantationandstrongbiteforce
AT shawjacko biteforcedatasuggestsrelationshipbetweenacrodonttoothimplantationandstrongbiteforce