Cargando…
Growth Parameters of under 2-year-old Indian Children: A Comparison to WHO MGRS 2006 Charts
CONTEXT: Growth is an important biological process by which an individual reaches a point of complete physical development. Growth monitoring of a child is a very important utility to detect the deviation from normal growth. In India, for children below 2 years of age WHO multicentre growth referenc...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7333749/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32699786 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijem.IJEM_570_19 |
_version_ | 1783553809677549568 |
---|---|
author | Reddy, Venkat Sandeep Jahagirdar, Rahul Deshpande, Ruma |
author_facet | Reddy, Venkat Sandeep Jahagirdar, Rahul Deshpande, Ruma |
author_sort | Reddy, Venkat Sandeep |
collection | PubMed |
description | CONTEXT: Growth is an important biological process by which an individual reaches a point of complete physical development. Growth monitoring of a child is a very important utility to detect the deviation from normal growth. In India, for children below 2 years of age WHO multicentre growth reference study (MGRS) 2006 charts are being used for growth monitoring, which were prepared by measuring children from six different countries who were raised in optimum conditions of health and nutrition. AIM: This study was carried out to verify the appropriateness of the WHO MRGS 2006 charts to monitor the growth of Indian children who are below 2 years of age. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: The study was carried out in a tertiary care hospital in Pune, Maharashtra. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 1947 children [1089 boys (55.9%)] were measured for weight, length and head circumference. Z score for each observed value was calculated according the similar but gender-specific WHO MGRS 2006 growth charts. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: The age- and sex-specific Z-scores or standard deviation scores along with prevalence were obtained for each study parameter using WHO standards. RESULTS: A total of 24.08%, 21.31%, and 20.54% of the children were classified as underweight, stunted and microcephalic respectively when compared to the WHO MGRS 2006 growth charts. CONCLUSION: The WHO MGRS 2006 charts may not be appropriate for growth monitoring of Indian children below 2 years of age and there is a need formulate growth charts which can reflect the growth of Indian children. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7333749 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73337492020-07-21 Growth Parameters of under 2-year-old Indian Children: A Comparison to WHO MGRS 2006 Charts Reddy, Venkat Sandeep Jahagirdar, Rahul Deshpande, Ruma Indian J Endocrinol Metab Original Article CONTEXT: Growth is an important biological process by which an individual reaches a point of complete physical development. Growth monitoring of a child is a very important utility to detect the deviation from normal growth. In India, for children below 2 years of age WHO multicentre growth reference study (MGRS) 2006 charts are being used for growth monitoring, which were prepared by measuring children from six different countries who were raised in optimum conditions of health and nutrition. AIM: This study was carried out to verify the appropriateness of the WHO MRGS 2006 charts to monitor the growth of Indian children who are below 2 years of age. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: The study was carried out in a tertiary care hospital in Pune, Maharashtra. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 1947 children [1089 boys (55.9%)] were measured for weight, length and head circumference. Z score for each observed value was calculated according the similar but gender-specific WHO MGRS 2006 growth charts. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: The age- and sex-specific Z-scores or standard deviation scores along with prevalence were obtained for each study parameter using WHO standards. RESULTS: A total of 24.08%, 21.31%, and 20.54% of the children were classified as underweight, stunted and microcephalic respectively when compared to the WHO MGRS 2006 growth charts. CONCLUSION: The WHO MGRS 2006 charts may not be appropriate for growth monitoring of Indian children below 2 years of age and there is a need formulate growth charts which can reflect the growth of Indian children. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020 2020-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7333749/ /pubmed/32699786 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijem.IJEM_570_19 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Indian Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Reddy, Venkat Sandeep Jahagirdar, Rahul Deshpande, Ruma Growth Parameters of under 2-year-old Indian Children: A Comparison to WHO MGRS 2006 Charts |
title | Growth Parameters of under 2-year-old Indian Children: A Comparison to WHO MGRS 2006 Charts |
title_full | Growth Parameters of under 2-year-old Indian Children: A Comparison to WHO MGRS 2006 Charts |
title_fullStr | Growth Parameters of under 2-year-old Indian Children: A Comparison to WHO MGRS 2006 Charts |
title_full_unstemmed | Growth Parameters of under 2-year-old Indian Children: A Comparison to WHO MGRS 2006 Charts |
title_short | Growth Parameters of under 2-year-old Indian Children: A Comparison to WHO MGRS 2006 Charts |
title_sort | growth parameters of under 2-year-old indian children: a comparison to who mgrs 2006 charts |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7333749/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32699786 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijem.IJEM_570_19 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT reddyvenkatsandeep growthparametersofunder2yearoldindianchildrenacomparisontowhomgrs2006charts AT jahagirdarrahul growthparametersofunder2yearoldindianchildrenacomparisontowhomgrs2006charts AT deshpanderuma growthparametersofunder2yearoldindianchildrenacomparisontowhomgrs2006charts |