Cargando…

Critically Appraised Topics (CATs) in Veterinary Medicine: Applying Evidence in Clinical Practice

Critically appraised topics (CATs) are evidence syntheses that provide veterinary professionals with information to rapidly address clinical questions and support the practice of evidence-based veterinary medicine (EBVM). They also have an important role to play in both undergraduate and post-regist...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brennan, Marnie L., Arlt, Sebastian P., Belshaw, Zoe, Buckley, Louise, Corah, Louise, Doit, Hannah, Fajt, Virginia R., Grindlay, Douglas J. C., Moberly, Heather K., Morrow, Lisa D., Stavisky, Jenny, White, Constance
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7333781/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32695798
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.00314
_version_ 1783553817643581440
author Brennan, Marnie L.
Arlt, Sebastian P.
Belshaw, Zoe
Buckley, Louise
Corah, Louise
Doit, Hannah
Fajt, Virginia R.
Grindlay, Douglas J. C.
Moberly, Heather K.
Morrow, Lisa D.
Stavisky, Jenny
White, Constance
author_facet Brennan, Marnie L.
Arlt, Sebastian P.
Belshaw, Zoe
Buckley, Louise
Corah, Louise
Doit, Hannah
Fajt, Virginia R.
Grindlay, Douglas J. C.
Moberly, Heather K.
Morrow, Lisa D.
Stavisky, Jenny
White, Constance
author_sort Brennan, Marnie L.
collection PubMed
description Critically appraised topics (CATs) are evidence syntheses that provide veterinary professionals with information to rapidly address clinical questions and support the practice of evidence-based veterinary medicine (EBVM). They also have an important role to play in both undergraduate and post-registration education of veterinary professionals, in research and knowledge gap identification, literature scoping, preparing research grants and informing policy. CATs are not without limitations, the primary one relating to the rapid approach used which may lead to selection bias or restrict information identified or retrieved. Furthermore, the narrow focus of CATs may limit applicability of the evidence findings beyond a specific clinical scenario, and infrequently updated CATs may become redundant. Despite these limitations, CATs are fundamental to EBVM in the veterinary profession. Using the example of a dog with osteoarthritis, the five steps involved in creating and applying a CAT to clinical practice are outlined, with an emphasis on clinical relevance and practicalities. Finally, potential future developments for CATs and their role in EBVM, and the education of veterinary professionals are discussed. This review is focused on critically appraised topics (CATs) as a form of evidence synthesis in veterinary medicine. It aims to be a primary guide for veterinarians, from students to clinicians, and for veterinary nurses and technicians (hereafter collectively called veterinary professionals). Additionally, this review provides further information for those with some experience of CATs who would like to better understand the historic context and process, including further detail on more advanced concepts. This more detailed information will appear in pop-out boxes with a double-lined surround to distinguish it from the information core to producing and interpreting CATs, and from the boxes with a single line surround which contain additional resources relevant to the different parts of the review.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7333781
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73337812020-07-20 Critically Appraised Topics (CATs) in Veterinary Medicine: Applying Evidence in Clinical Practice Brennan, Marnie L. Arlt, Sebastian P. Belshaw, Zoe Buckley, Louise Corah, Louise Doit, Hannah Fajt, Virginia R. Grindlay, Douglas J. C. Moberly, Heather K. Morrow, Lisa D. Stavisky, Jenny White, Constance Front Vet Sci Veterinary Science Critically appraised topics (CATs) are evidence syntheses that provide veterinary professionals with information to rapidly address clinical questions and support the practice of evidence-based veterinary medicine (EBVM). They also have an important role to play in both undergraduate and post-registration education of veterinary professionals, in research and knowledge gap identification, literature scoping, preparing research grants and informing policy. CATs are not without limitations, the primary one relating to the rapid approach used which may lead to selection bias or restrict information identified or retrieved. Furthermore, the narrow focus of CATs may limit applicability of the evidence findings beyond a specific clinical scenario, and infrequently updated CATs may become redundant. Despite these limitations, CATs are fundamental to EBVM in the veterinary profession. Using the example of a dog with osteoarthritis, the five steps involved in creating and applying a CAT to clinical practice are outlined, with an emphasis on clinical relevance and practicalities. Finally, potential future developments for CATs and their role in EBVM, and the education of veterinary professionals are discussed. This review is focused on critically appraised topics (CATs) as a form of evidence synthesis in veterinary medicine. It aims to be a primary guide for veterinarians, from students to clinicians, and for veterinary nurses and technicians (hereafter collectively called veterinary professionals). Additionally, this review provides further information for those with some experience of CATs who would like to better understand the historic context and process, including further detail on more advanced concepts. This more detailed information will appear in pop-out boxes with a double-lined surround to distinguish it from the information core to producing and interpreting CATs, and from the boxes with a single line surround which contain additional resources relevant to the different parts of the review. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7333781/ /pubmed/32695798 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.00314 Text en Copyright © 2020 Brennan, Arlt, Belshaw, Buckley, Corah, Doit, Fajt, Grindlay, Moberly, Morrow, Stavisky and White. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Veterinary Science
Brennan, Marnie L.
Arlt, Sebastian P.
Belshaw, Zoe
Buckley, Louise
Corah, Louise
Doit, Hannah
Fajt, Virginia R.
Grindlay, Douglas J. C.
Moberly, Heather K.
Morrow, Lisa D.
Stavisky, Jenny
White, Constance
Critically Appraised Topics (CATs) in Veterinary Medicine: Applying Evidence in Clinical Practice
title Critically Appraised Topics (CATs) in Veterinary Medicine: Applying Evidence in Clinical Practice
title_full Critically Appraised Topics (CATs) in Veterinary Medicine: Applying Evidence in Clinical Practice
title_fullStr Critically Appraised Topics (CATs) in Veterinary Medicine: Applying Evidence in Clinical Practice
title_full_unstemmed Critically Appraised Topics (CATs) in Veterinary Medicine: Applying Evidence in Clinical Practice
title_short Critically Appraised Topics (CATs) in Veterinary Medicine: Applying Evidence in Clinical Practice
title_sort critically appraised topics (cats) in veterinary medicine: applying evidence in clinical practice
topic Veterinary Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7333781/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32695798
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.00314
work_keys_str_mv AT brennanmarniel criticallyappraisedtopicscatsinveterinarymedicineapplyingevidenceinclinicalpractice
AT arltsebastianp criticallyappraisedtopicscatsinveterinarymedicineapplyingevidenceinclinicalpractice
AT belshawzoe criticallyappraisedtopicscatsinveterinarymedicineapplyingevidenceinclinicalpractice
AT buckleylouise criticallyappraisedtopicscatsinveterinarymedicineapplyingevidenceinclinicalpractice
AT corahlouise criticallyappraisedtopicscatsinveterinarymedicineapplyingevidenceinclinicalpractice
AT doithannah criticallyappraisedtopicscatsinveterinarymedicineapplyingevidenceinclinicalpractice
AT fajtvirginiar criticallyappraisedtopicscatsinveterinarymedicineapplyingevidenceinclinicalpractice
AT grindlaydouglasjc criticallyappraisedtopicscatsinveterinarymedicineapplyingevidenceinclinicalpractice
AT moberlyheatherk criticallyappraisedtopicscatsinveterinarymedicineapplyingevidenceinclinicalpractice
AT morrowlisad criticallyappraisedtopicscatsinveterinarymedicineapplyingevidenceinclinicalpractice
AT staviskyjenny criticallyappraisedtopicscatsinveterinarymedicineapplyingevidenceinclinicalpractice
AT whiteconstance criticallyappraisedtopicscatsinveterinarymedicineapplyingevidenceinclinicalpractice