Cargando…

Patient and clinician experience of a serious illness conversation guide in oncology: A descriptive analysis

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Oncology guidelines recommend earlier communication with patients about prognosis and goals‐of‐care in serious illness. However, current evidence leaves gaps in our understanding of the experience of these conversations. This analysis evaluates the patient and clinician experie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Paladino, Joanna, Koritsanszky, Luca, Nisotel, Lauren, Neville, Bridget A., Miller, Kate, Sanders, Justin, Benjamin, Evan, Fromme, Erik, Block, Susan, Bernacki, Rachelle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7333843/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32363775
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.3102
_version_ 1783553830620758016
author Paladino, Joanna
Koritsanszky, Luca
Nisotel, Lauren
Neville, Bridget A.
Miller, Kate
Sanders, Justin
Benjamin, Evan
Fromme, Erik
Block, Susan
Bernacki, Rachelle
author_facet Paladino, Joanna
Koritsanszky, Luca
Nisotel, Lauren
Neville, Bridget A.
Miller, Kate
Sanders, Justin
Benjamin, Evan
Fromme, Erik
Block, Susan
Bernacki, Rachelle
author_sort Paladino, Joanna
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Oncology guidelines recommend earlier communication with patients about prognosis and goals‐of‐care in serious illness. However, current evidence leaves gaps in our understanding of the experience of these conversations. This analysis evaluates the patient and clinician experience of a conversation using a Serious Illness Conversation Guide (SICG). DESIGN/SETTING: Secondary analysis from a cluster‐randomized clinical trial in a northeastern cancer center. PARTICIPANTS: Physicians, advanced practice clinicians, and patients with advanced cancer who received the intervention. INTERVENTION: SICG, clinician training, systems‐changes. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The patient questionnaire assessed perceptions of the conversation and impact on anxiety, hopefulness, peacefulness, sense of control over medical decisions, closeness with their clinician, and behaviors. The clinician questionnaire assessed feasibility, acceptability, and impact on satisfaction in their role. RESULTS: We enrolled 54 clinicians and 163 patients; 41 clinicians and 118 patients had a SICG discussion. Most patients described the conversation as worthwhile (79%) and reported no change or improvement in their sense of peacefulness, hopefulness, and anxiety (on average 79%); 56% reported feeling closer with their clinician. Qualitative patient data described positive behavior changes, including enhanced planning for future care and increased focus on personal priorities. Nearly 90% of clinicians agreed that the SICG facilitated timely, effective conversations, and 70% reported increased satisfaction in their role. CONCLUSION: Conversations using a SICG were feasible, acceptable, and were associated with positive experiences for both patients and clinicians in oncology in ways that align with national recommendations for serious illness communication. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01786811 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01786811.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7333843
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73338432020-07-07 Patient and clinician experience of a serious illness conversation guide in oncology: A descriptive analysis Paladino, Joanna Koritsanszky, Luca Nisotel, Lauren Neville, Bridget A. Miller, Kate Sanders, Justin Benjamin, Evan Fromme, Erik Block, Susan Bernacki, Rachelle Cancer Med Clinical Cancer Research BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Oncology guidelines recommend earlier communication with patients about prognosis and goals‐of‐care in serious illness. However, current evidence leaves gaps in our understanding of the experience of these conversations. This analysis evaluates the patient and clinician experience of a conversation using a Serious Illness Conversation Guide (SICG). DESIGN/SETTING: Secondary analysis from a cluster‐randomized clinical trial in a northeastern cancer center. PARTICIPANTS: Physicians, advanced practice clinicians, and patients with advanced cancer who received the intervention. INTERVENTION: SICG, clinician training, systems‐changes. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The patient questionnaire assessed perceptions of the conversation and impact on anxiety, hopefulness, peacefulness, sense of control over medical decisions, closeness with their clinician, and behaviors. The clinician questionnaire assessed feasibility, acceptability, and impact on satisfaction in their role. RESULTS: We enrolled 54 clinicians and 163 patients; 41 clinicians and 118 patients had a SICG discussion. Most patients described the conversation as worthwhile (79%) and reported no change or improvement in their sense of peacefulness, hopefulness, and anxiety (on average 79%); 56% reported feeling closer with their clinician. Qualitative patient data described positive behavior changes, including enhanced planning for future care and increased focus on personal priorities. Nearly 90% of clinicians agreed that the SICG facilitated timely, effective conversations, and 70% reported increased satisfaction in their role. CONCLUSION: Conversations using a SICG were feasible, acceptable, and were associated with positive experiences for both patients and clinicians in oncology in ways that align with national recommendations for serious illness communication. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01786811 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01786811. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7333843/ /pubmed/32363775 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.3102 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Cancer Research
Paladino, Joanna
Koritsanszky, Luca
Nisotel, Lauren
Neville, Bridget A.
Miller, Kate
Sanders, Justin
Benjamin, Evan
Fromme, Erik
Block, Susan
Bernacki, Rachelle
Patient and clinician experience of a serious illness conversation guide in oncology: A descriptive analysis
title Patient and clinician experience of a serious illness conversation guide in oncology: A descriptive analysis
title_full Patient and clinician experience of a serious illness conversation guide in oncology: A descriptive analysis
title_fullStr Patient and clinician experience of a serious illness conversation guide in oncology: A descriptive analysis
title_full_unstemmed Patient and clinician experience of a serious illness conversation guide in oncology: A descriptive analysis
title_short Patient and clinician experience of a serious illness conversation guide in oncology: A descriptive analysis
title_sort patient and clinician experience of a serious illness conversation guide in oncology: a descriptive analysis
topic Clinical Cancer Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7333843/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32363775
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.3102
work_keys_str_mv AT paladinojoanna patientandclinicianexperienceofaseriousillnessconversationguideinoncologyadescriptiveanalysis
AT koritsanszkyluca patientandclinicianexperienceofaseriousillnessconversationguideinoncologyadescriptiveanalysis
AT nisotellauren patientandclinicianexperienceofaseriousillnessconversationguideinoncologyadescriptiveanalysis
AT nevillebridgeta patientandclinicianexperienceofaseriousillnessconversationguideinoncologyadescriptiveanalysis
AT millerkate patientandclinicianexperienceofaseriousillnessconversationguideinoncologyadescriptiveanalysis
AT sandersjustin patientandclinicianexperienceofaseriousillnessconversationguideinoncologyadescriptiveanalysis
AT benjaminevan patientandclinicianexperienceofaseriousillnessconversationguideinoncologyadescriptiveanalysis
AT frommeerik patientandclinicianexperienceofaseriousillnessconversationguideinoncologyadescriptiveanalysis
AT blocksusan patientandclinicianexperienceofaseriousillnessconversationguideinoncologyadescriptiveanalysis
AT bernackirachelle patientandclinicianexperienceofaseriousillnessconversationguideinoncologyadescriptiveanalysis