Cargando…

Intravenous leiomyomatosis is inclined to a solid entity different from uterine leiomyoma based on RNA‐seq analysis with RT‐qPCR validation

INTRODUCTION: Intravenous leiomyomatosis (IVL) is currently regarded as a special variant of the common uterine leiomyoma (LM). Though IVL shows a similar histological morphology to LM, IVL is characterized by unique intravenous growth patterns and low‐grade malignant potential, which are quite diff...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Wenze, Wang, Yanfeng, Chen, Fei, Zhang, Ming, Jia, Rujing, Liu, Xingrong, Zhang, Chaoji, Shao, Jiang, Cheng, Ninghai, Ma, Guotao, Zhu, Zhaohui, Miao, Qi, Liang, Zhiyong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7333852/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32372565
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.3098
_version_ 1783553832740978688
author Wang, Wenze
Wang, Yanfeng
Chen, Fei
Zhang, Ming
Jia, Rujing
Liu, Xingrong
Zhang, Chaoji
Shao, Jiang
Cheng, Ninghai
Ma, Guotao
Zhu, Zhaohui
Miao, Qi
Liang, Zhiyong
author_facet Wang, Wenze
Wang, Yanfeng
Chen, Fei
Zhang, Ming
Jia, Rujing
Liu, Xingrong
Zhang, Chaoji
Shao, Jiang
Cheng, Ninghai
Ma, Guotao
Zhu, Zhaohui
Miao, Qi
Liang, Zhiyong
author_sort Wang, Wenze
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Intravenous leiomyomatosis (IVL) is currently regarded as a special variant of the common uterine leiomyoma (LM). Though IVL shows a similar histological morphology to LM, IVL is characterized by unique intravenous growth patterns and low‐grade malignant potential, which are quite different from LM. There are currently few studies underlying the molecular alterations of IVL, though this information is important for understanding the pathogenesis of the disease, and for identifying potential biomarkers. METHOD: We carried out a high‐throughput whole transcriptome sequencing of tumor and normal tissue samples from five IVL patients and five LM patients and compared the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between IVL and leiomyoma. We performed multiple different enrichment and target analyses, and the expression of selected DEGs was validated using RT‐qPCR in formalin‐fixed samples. RESULTS: Our study identified substantial different genes and pathways between IVL and LM, and functional enrichment analyses found several important pathways, such as angiogenesis and antiapoptosis pathways, as well as important related genes, including SH2D2A, VASH2, ADAM8, GATA2, TNF, and the lncRNA GATA6‐AS1, as being significantly different between IVL and LM (P = .0024, P = .0195, P = .0212, P = .0435, P = .0401, and P = .0246, respectively). CXCL8, LIF, CDKN2A, BCL2A1, COL2A1, IGF1, and HMGA2 were also differently expressed between IVL and LM groups, but showed no statistical difference (P = .2409, P = .1773, P = .0596, P = .2737, P = .1553, P = .1045, and P = .1847, respectively) due to the large differences among individuals. Furthermore, RT‐qPCR results for five selected DEGs in IVL tissues and adjacent nontumor tissues were mainly consistent with our sequencing results. CONCLUSION: Our results indicated that IVL may be a solid entity that is unique and different from LM, proving consistent with previous studies. Furthermore, we identified DEGs, particularly within angiogenesis and antiapoptosis pathway‐related genes that may play crucial roles in the development and pathogenesis of IVL and may be potential specific biomarkers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7333852
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73338522020-07-07 Intravenous leiomyomatosis is inclined to a solid entity different from uterine leiomyoma based on RNA‐seq analysis with RT‐qPCR validation Wang, Wenze Wang, Yanfeng Chen, Fei Zhang, Ming Jia, Rujing Liu, Xingrong Zhang, Chaoji Shao, Jiang Cheng, Ninghai Ma, Guotao Zhu, Zhaohui Miao, Qi Liang, Zhiyong Cancer Med Clinical Cancer Research INTRODUCTION: Intravenous leiomyomatosis (IVL) is currently regarded as a special variant of the common uterine leiomyoma (LM). Though IVL shows a similar histological morphology to LM, IVL is characterized by unique intravenous growth patterns and low‐grade malignant potential, which are quite different from LM. There are currently few studies underlying the molecular alterations of IVL, though this information is important for understanding the pathogenesis of the disease, and for identifying potential biomarkers. METHOD: We carried out a high‐throughput whole transcriptome sequencing of tumor and normal tissue samples from five IVL patients and five LM patients and compared the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between IVL and leiomyoma. We performed multiple different enrichment and target analyses, and the expression of selected DEGs was validated using RT‐qPCR in formalin‐fixed samples. RESULTS: Our study identified substantial different genes and pathways between IVL and LM, and functional enrichment analyses found several important pathways, such as angiogenesis and antiapoptosis pathways, as well as important related genes, including SH2D2A, VASH2, ADAM8, GATA2, TNF, and the lncRNA GATA6‐AS1, as being significantly different between IVL and LM (P = .0024, P = .0195, P = .0212, P = .0435, P = .0401, and P = .0246, respectively). CXCL8, LIF, CDKN2A, BCL2A1, COL2A1, IGF1, and HMGA2 were also differently expressed between IVL and LM groups, but showed no statistical difference (P = .2409, P = .1773, P = .0596, P = .2737, P = .1553, P = .1045, and P = .1847, respectively) due to the large differences among individuals. Furthermore, RT‐qPCR results for five selected DEGs in IVL tissues and adjacent nontumor tissues were mainly consistent with our sequencing results. CONCLUSION: Our results indicated that IVL may be a solid entity that is unique and different from LM, proving consistent with previous studies. Furthermore, we identified DEGs, particularly within angiogenesis and antiapoptosis pathway‐related genes that may play crucial roles in the development and pathogenesis of IVL and may be potential specific biomarkers. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7333852/ /pubmed/32372565 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.3098 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Cancer Research
Wang, Wenze
Wang, Yanfeng
Chen, Fei
Zhang, Ming
Jia, Rujing
Liu, Xingrong
Zhang, Chaoji
Shao, Jiang
Cheng, Ninghai
Ma, Guotao
Zhu, Zhaohui
Miao, Qi
Liang, Zhiyong
Intravenous leiomyomatosis is inclined to a solid entity different from uterine leiomyoma based on RNA‐seq analysis with RT‐qPCR validation
title Intravenous leiomyomatosis is inclined to a solid entity different from uterine leiomyoma based on RNA‐seq analysis with RT‐qPCR validation
title_full Intravenous leiomyomatosis is inclined to a solid entity different from uterine leiomyoma based on RNA‐seq analysis with RT‐qPCR validation
title_fullStr Intravenous leiomyomatosis is inclined to a solid entity different from uterine leiomyoma based on RNA‐seq analysis with RT‐qPCR validation
title_full_unstemmed Intravenous leiomyomatosis is inclined to a solid entity different from uterine leiomyoma based on RNA‐seq analysis with RT‐qPCR validation
title_short Intravenous leiomyomatosis is inclined to a solid entity different from uterine leiomyoma based on RNA‐seq analysis with RT‐qPCR validation
title_sort intravenous leiomyomatosis is inclined to a solid entity different from uterine leiomyoma based on rna‐seq analysis with rt‐qpcr validation
topic Clinical Cancer Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7333852/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32372565
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.3098
work_keys_str_mv AT wangwenze intravenousleiomyomatosisisinclinedtoasolidentitydifferentfromuterineleiomyomabasedonrnaseqanalysiswithrtqpcrvalidation
AT wangyanfeng intravenousleiomyomatosisisinclinedtoasolidentitydifferentfromuterineleiomyomabasedonrnaseqanalysiswithrtqpcrvalidation
AT chenfei intravenousleiomyomatosisisinclinedtoasolidentitydifferentfromuterineleiomyomabasedonrnaseqanalysiswithrtqpcrvalidation
AT zhangming intravenousleiomyomatosisisinclinedtoasolidentitydifferentfromuterineleiomyomabasedonrnaseqanalysiswithrtqpcrvalidation
AT jiarujing intravenousleiomyomatosisisinclinedtoasolidentitydifferentfromuterineleiomyomabasedonrnaseqanalysiswithrtqpcrvalidation
AT liuxingrong intravenousleiomyomatosisisinclinedtoasolidentitydifferentfromuterineleiomyomabasedonrnaseqanalysiswithrtqpcrvalidation
AT zhangchaoji intravenousleiomyomatosisisinclinedtoasolidentitydifferentfromuterineleiomyomabasedonrnaseqanalysiswithrtqpcrvalidation
AT shaojiang intravenousleiomyomatosisisinclinedtoasolidentitydifferentfromuterineleiomyomabasedonrnaseqanalysiswithrtqpcrvalidation
AT chengninghai intravenousleiomyomatosisisinclinedtoasolidentitydifferentfromuterineleiomyomabasedonrnaseqanalysiswithrtqpcrvalidation
AT maguotao intravenousleiomyomatosisisinclinedtoasolidentitydifferentfromuterineleiomyomabasedonrnaseqanalysiswithrtqpcrvalidation
AT zhuzhaohui intravenousleiomyomatosisisinclinedtoasolidentitydifferentfromuterineleiomyomabasedonrnaseqanalysiswithrtqpcrvalidation
AT miaoqi intravenousleiomyomatosisisinclinedtoasolidentitydifferentfromuterineleiomyomabasedonrnaseqanalysiswithrtqpcrvalidation
AT liangzhiyong intravenousleiomyomatosisisinclinedtoasolidentitydifferentfromuterineleiomyomabasedonrnaseqanalysiswithrtqpcrvalidation