Cargando…

How to Approach Para-Aortic Lymph Node Metastases During Exploration for Suspected Periampullary Carcinoma: Resection or Bypass?

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative para-aortic lymph node (PALN) sampling during surgical exploration in patients with suspected pancreatic head cancer remains controversial. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the value of routine PALN sampling and the consequences of different treatment strateg...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pranger, Bobby K., Tseng, Dorine S. J., Ubels, Sander, van Santvoort, Hjalmar C., Nieuwenhuijs, Vincent B., de Jong, Koert P., Patijn, Gijs, Molenaar, I. Quintus, Erdmann, Joris I., de Meijer, Vincent E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7334266/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32157526
http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-08304-0
_version_ 1783553903995912192
author Pranger, Bobby K.
Tseng, Dorine S. J.
Ubels, Sander
van Santvoort, Hjalmar C.
Nieuwenhuijs, Vincent B.
de Jong, Koert P.
Patijn, Gijs
Molenaar, I. Quintus
Erdmann, Joris I.
de Meijer, Vincent E.
author_facet Pranger, Bobby K.
Tseng, Dorine S. J.
Ubels, Sander
van Santvoort, Hjalmar C.
Nieuwenhuijs, Vincent B.
de Jong, Koert P.
Patijn, Gijs
Molenaar, I. Quintus
Erdmann, Joris I.
de Meijer, Vincent E.
author_sort Pranger, Bobby K.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Intraoperative para-aortic lymph node (PALN) sampling during surgical exploration in patients with suspected pancreatic head cancer remains controversial. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the value of routine PALN sampling and the consequences of different treatment strategies on overall patient survival. METHODS: A retrospective, multicenter cohort study was performed in patients who underwent surgical exploration for suspected pancreatic head cancer. In cohort A, the treatment strategy was to avoid pancreatoduodenectomy and to perform a double bypass procedure when PALN metastases were found during exploration. In cohort B, routinely harvested PALNs were not examined intraoperatively and pancreatoduodenectomy was performed regardless. PALNs were examined with the final resection specimen. Clinicopathological data, survival data and complication data were compared between study groups. RESULTS: Median overall survival for patients with PALN metastases who underwent a double bypass procedure was 7.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.5–8.5), versus 11 months (95% CI 8.8–13) in the pancreatoduodenectomy group (p = 0.049). Patients with PALN metastases who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy had significantly increased postoperative morbidity compared with patients who underwent a double bypass procedure (p < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, severe comorbidity (ASA grade 2 or higher) was an independent predictor for decreased survival in patients with PALN involvement (hazard ratio 3.607, 95% CI 1.678–7.751; p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: In patients with PALN metastases, pancreatoduodenectomy was associated with significant survival benefit compared with a double bypass procedure, but with increased risk of complications. It is important to weigh the advantages of resection versus bypass against factors such as comorbidities and clinical performance when positive intraoperative PALNs are found. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1245/s10434-020-08304-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7334266
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73342662020-07-09 How to Approach Para-Aortic Lymph Node Metastases During Exploration for Suspected Periampullary Carcinoma: Resection or Bypass? Pranger, Bobby K. Tseng, Dorine S. J. Ubels, Sander van Santvoort, Hjalmar C. Nieuwenhuijs, Vincent B. de Jong, Koert P. Patijn, Gijs Molenaar, I. Quintus Erdmann, Joris I. de Meijer, Vincent E. Ann Surg Oncol Pancreatic Tumors BACKGROUND: Intraoperative para-aortic lymph node (PALN) sampling during surgical exploration in patients with suspected pancreatic head cancer remains controversial. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the value of routine PALN sampling and the consequences of different treatment strategies on overall patient survival. METHODS: A retrospective, multicenter cohort study was performed in patients who underwent surgical exploration for suspected pancreatic head cancer. In cohort A, the treatment strategy was to avoid pancreatoduodenectomy and to perform a double bypass procedure when PALN metastases were found during exploration. In cohort B, routinely harvested PALNs were not examined intraoperatively and pancreatoduodenectomy was performed regardless. PALNs were examined with the final resection specimen. Clinicopathological data, survival data and complication data were compared between study groups. RESULTS: Median overall survival for patients with PALN metastases who underwent a double bypass procedure was 7.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.5–8.5), versus 11 months (95% CI 8.8–13) in the pancreatoduodenectomy group (p = 0.049). Patients with PALN metastases who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy had significantly increased postoperative morbidity compared with patients who underwent a double bypass procedure (p < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, severe comorbidity (ASA grade 2 or higher) was an independent predictor for decreased survival in patients with PALN involvement (hazard ratio 3.607, 95% CI 1.678–7.751; p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: In patients with PALN metastases, pancreatoduodenectomy was associated with significant survival benefit compared with a double bypass procedure, but with increased risk of complications. It is important to weigh the advantages of resection versus bypass against factors such as comorbidities and clinical performance when positive intraoperative PALNs are found. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1245/s10434-020-08304-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2020-03-10 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7334266/ /pubmed/32157526 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-08304-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Pancreatic Tumors
Pranger, Bobby K.
Tseng, Dorine S. J.
Ubels, Sander
van Santvoort, Hjalmar C.
Nieuwenhuijs, Vincent B.
de Jong, Koert P.
Patijn, Gijs
Molenaar, I. Quintus
Erdmann, Joris I.
de Meijer, Vincent E.
How to Approach Para-Aortic Lymph Node Metastases During Exploration for Suspected Periampullary Carcinoma: Resection or Bypass?
title How to Approach Para-Aortic Lymph Node Metastases During Exploration for Suspected Periampullary Carcinoma: Resection or Bypass?
title_full How to Approach Para-Aortic Lymph Node Metastases During Exploration for Suspected Periampullary Carcinoma: Resection or Bypass?
title_fullStr How to Approach Para-Aortic Lymph Node Metastases During Exploration for Suspected Periampullary Carcinoma: Resection or Bypass?
title_full_unstemmed How to Approach Para-Aortic Lymph Node Metastases During Exploration for Suspected Periampullary Carcinoma: Resection or Bypass?
title_short How to Approach Para-Aortic Lymph Node Metastases During Exploration for Suspected Periampullary Carcinoma: Resection or Bypass?
title_sort how to approach para-aortic lymph node metastases during exploration for suspected periampullary carcinoma: resection or bypass?
topic Pancreatic Tumors
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7334266/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32157526
http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-08304-0
work_keys_str_mv AT prangerbobbyk howtoapproachparaaorticlymphnodemetastasesduringexplorationforsuspectedperiampullarycarcinomaresectionorbypass
AT tsengdorinesj howtoapproachparaaorticlymphnodemetastasesduringexplorationforsuspectedperiampullarycarcinomaresectionorbypass
AT ubelssander howtoapproachparaaorticlymphnodemetastasesduringexplorationforsuspectedperiampullarycarcinomaresectionorbypass
AT vansantvoorthjalmarc howtoapproachparaaorticlymphnodemetastasesduringexplorationforsuspectedperiampullarycarcinomaresectionorbypass
AT nieuwenhuijsvincentb howtoapproachparaaorticlymphnodemetastasesduringexplorationforsuspectedperiampullarycarcinomaresectionorbypass
AT dejongkoertp howtoapproachparaaorticlymphnodemetastasesduringexplorationforsuspectedperiampullarycarcinomaresectionorbypass
AT patijngijs howtoapproachparaaorticlymphnodemetastasesduringexplorationforsuspectedperiampullarycarcinomaresectionorbypass
AT molenaariquintus howtoapproachparaaorticlymphnodemetastasesduringexplorationforsuspectedperiampullarycarcinomaresectionorbypass
AT erdmannjorisi howtoapproachparaaorticlymphnodemetastasesduringexplorationforsuspectedperiampullarycarcinomaresectionorbypass
AT demeijervincente howtoapproachparaaorticlymphnodemetastasesduringexplorationforsuspectedperiampullarycarcinomaresectionorbypass