Cargando…

Response to Ipilimumab/Nivolumab Rechallenge and BRAF Inhibitor/MEK Inhibitor Rechallenge in a Patient with Advanced Metastatic Melanoma Previously Treated with BRAF Targeted Therapy and Immunotherapy

Little is known about the optimal sequencing of targeted therapy and immunotherapy in the treatment of patients with BRAF(V600)-mutated metastatic melanoma. BRAF/MEK inhibition often has the benefit of rapid disease regression; however, resistance is frequently seen with long-term use. Treatment wit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Myrdal, Caitlyn N., Sundararajan, Srinath
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7334770/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32670650
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/4392562
_version_ 1783554002635456512
author Myrdal, Caitlyn N.
Sundararajan, Srinath
author_facet Myrdal, Caitlyn N.
Sundararajan, Srinath
author_sort Myrdal, Caitlyn N.
collection PubMed
description Little is known about the optimal sequencing of targeted therapy and immunotherapy in the treatment of patients with BRAF(V600)-mutated metastatic melanoma. BRAF/MEK inhibition often has the benefit of rapid disease regression; however, resistance is frequently seen with long-term use. Treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors offers the potential for long-term response but displays a lower rate of objective response. The benefit of synergy between therapies is apparent; however, there is limited data regarding optimal sequencing in the treatment of advanced melanoma. We present the case of a 62-year-old gentleman with advanced BRAF(V600)-mutated melanoma who followed an unconventional treatment path. After progressing on single-agent vemurafenib, he had response to multiple modalities of immunotherapy before progression. After, he had a substantial response to multiple BRAF/MEK inhibitor rechallenges before developing resistance. The patient is now stable after a retrial of combination immunotherapy. Our case illustrates that with the right sequencing of therapy, meaningful clinical responses can be elicited with rechallenging of targeted therapy and immunotherapy in metastatic melanoma.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7334770
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73347702020-07-14 Response to Ipilimumab/Nivolumab Rechallenge and BRAF Inhibitor/MEK Inhibitor Rechallenge in a Patient with Advanced Metastatic Melanoma Previously Treated with BRAF Targeted Therapy and Immunotherapy Myrdal, Caitlyn N. Sundararajan, Srinath Case Rep Oncol Med Case Report Little is known about the optimal sequencing of targeted therapy and immunotherapy in the treatment of patients with BRAF(V600)-mutated metastatic melanoma. BRAF/MEK inhibition often has the benefit of rapid disease regression; however, resistance is frequently seen with long-term use. Treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors offers the potential for long-term response but displays a lower rate of objective response. The benefit of synergy between therapies is apparent; however, there is limited data regarding optimal sequencing in the treatment of advanced melanoma. We present the case of a 62-year-old gentleman with advanced BRAF(V600)-mutated melanoma who followed an unconventional treatment path. After progressing on single-agent vemurafenib, he had response to multiple modalities of immunotherapy before progression. After, he had a substantial response to multiple BRAF/MEK inhibitor rechallenges before developing resistance. The patient is now stable after a retrial of combination immunotherapy. Our case illustrates that with the right sequencing of therapy, meaningful clinical responses can be elicited with rechallenging of targeted therapy and immunotherapy in metastatic melanoma. Hindawi 2020-06-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7334770/ /pubmed/32670650 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/4392562 Text en Copyright © 2020 Caitlyn N. Myrdal and Srinath Sundararajan. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Case Report
Myrdal, Caitlyn N.
Sundararajan, Srinath
Response to Ipilimumab/Nivolumab Rechallenge and BRAF Inhibitor/MEK Inhibitor Rechallenge in a Patient with Advanced Metastatic Melanoma Previously Treated with BRAF Targeted Therapy and Immunotherapy
title Response to Ipilimumab/Nivolumab Rechallenge and BRAF Inhibitor/MEK Inhibitor Rechallenge in a Patient with Advanced Metastatic Melanoma Previously Treated with BRAF Targeted Therapy and Immunotherapy
title_full Response to Ipilimumab/Nivolumab Rechallenge and BRAF Inhibitor/MEK Inhibitor Rechallenge in a Patient with Advanced Metastatic Melanoma Previously Treated with BRAF Targeted Therapy and Immunotherapy
title_fullStr Response to Ipilimumab/Nivolumab Rechallenge and BRAF Inhibitor/MEK Inhibitor Rechallenge in a Patient with Advanced Metastatic Melanoma Previously Treated with BRAF Targeted Therapy and Immunotherapy
title_full_unstemmed Response to Ipilimumab/Nivolumab Rechallenge and BRAF Inhibitor/MEK Inhibitor Rechallenge in a Patient with Advanced Metastatic Melanoma Previously Treated with BRAF Targeted Therapy and Immunotherapy
title_short Response to Ipilimumab/Nivolumab Rechallenge and BRAF Inhibitor/MEK Inhibitor Rechallenge in a Patient with Advanced Metastatic Melanoma Previously Treated with BRAF Targeted Therapy and Immunotherapy
title_sort response to ipilimumab/nivolumab rechallenge and braf inhibitor/mek inhibitor rechallenge in a patient with advanced metastatic melanoma previously treated with braf targeted therapy and immunotherapy
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7334770/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32670650
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/4392562
work_keys_str_mv AT myrdalcaitlynn responsetoipilimumabnivolumabrechallengeandbrafinhibitormekinhibitorrechallengeinapatientwithadvancedmetastaticmelanomapreviouslytreatedwithbraftargetedtherapyandimmunotherapy
AT sundararajansrinath responsetoipilimumabnivolumabrechallengeandbrafinhibitormekinhibitorrechallengeinapatientwithadvancedmetastaticmelanomapreviouslytreatedwithbraftargetedtherapyandimmunotherapy