Cargando…

An in vitro study to compare the surface roughness of glazed and chairside polished dental monolithic zirconia using two polishing systems

AIM: To evaluate the efficiency of two commercially available polishing systems in reducing surface roughness of a monolithic zirconia after clinical adjustment and to compare them to glazed zirconia. SETTING AND DESIGN: In vitro study. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This in vitro study was conducted on 25 d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gaonkar, Sneha Harishchandra, Aras, Meena Ajay, Chitre, Vidya
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7335032/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32655223
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_339_19
_version_ 1783554053659164672
author Gaonkar, Sneha Harishchandra
Aras, Meena Ajay
Chitre, Vidya
author_facet Gaonkar, Sneha Harishchandra
Aras, Meena Ajay
Chitre, Vidya
author_sort Gaonkar, Sneha Harishchandra
collection PubMed
description AIM: To evaluate the efficiency of two commercially available polishing systems in reducing surface roughness of a monolithic zirconia after clinical adjustment and to compare them to glazed zirconia. SETTING AND DESIGN: In vitro study. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This in vitro study was conducted on 25 discs (10mm in diameter and 2mm in thickness) using monolithic zirconia (Ceramill Zolid). From 25 specimens, 5 specimens were randomly selected as the positive control. The remaining discs were abraded for 15 secs with a red band diamond finishing bur using an air rotor handpiece. Then the specimens were randomly divided into 5 equal groups of 5 specimens each. Group 1: Roughened, unpolished and unglazed. Group 2 (Positive Control): Glazed without prior roughening,Group 3: Roughened and polished with eZr polishing kit, Group 4: Roughened and polished with Optra fine ceramic polishing kit and Group 5: Roughened and glazed. The surface roughness (Ra) values (μm) were measured quantitatively by a surface analyzer. The mean values were compared using one-way ANOVA and Post Hoc Test. One specimen of each group was evaluated qualitatively under a scanning electron microscope(SEM) for surface topography. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: One-way ANOVA and Post Hoc Test. RESULTS: The lowest Ra value was found in Group 4-Roughened and polished with Optrafine ceramic polishing kit (Ra=0.47μm) as compared to Group 3-Roughened and polished with eZr polishing kit (Ra=0.49μm) and Group 5-Roughened and glazed (Ra=0.59μm). There was no stastistically significant difference between two polishing systems. SEM analysis of surfaces polished with Optrafine polishing kit revealed smoother and regular morphology as compared to surfaces polished with eZr polishing kit. CONCLUSION: The Optrafine polishing kit created more smoother and uniform surfaces as compared to surfaces polished with eZr polishing kit both quantitatively and qualitatively. Also, lowest surface roughness values were produced by optrafine ceramic polishing kit on monolithic zirconia as compared to glazed monolithic zirconia after their clinical adjustments.Thus Optrafine ceramic polishing kit can be used as alternative to glazing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7335032
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73350322021-04-01 An in vitro study to compare the surface roughness of glazed and chairside polished dental monolithic zirconia using two polishing systems Gaonkar, Sneha Harishchandra Aras, Meena Ajay Chitre, Vidya J Indian Prosthodont Soc Original Article AIM: To evaluate the efficiency of two commercially available polishing systems in reducing surface roughness of a monolithic zirconia after clinical adjustment and to compare them to glazed zirconia. SETTING AND DESIGN: In vitro study. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This in vitro study was conducted on 25 discs (10mm in diameter and 2mm in thickness) using monolithic zirconia (Ceramill Zolid). From 25 specimens, 5 specimens were randomly selected as the positive control. The remaining discs were abraded for 15 secs with a red band diamond finishing bur using an air rotor handpiece. Then the specimens were randomly divided into 5 equal groups of 5 specimens each. Group 1: Roughened, unpolished and unglazed. Group 2 (Positive Control): Glazed without prior roughening,Group 3: Roughened and polished with eZr polishing kit, Group 4: Roughened and polished with Optra fine ceramic polishing kit and Group 5: Roughened and glazed. The surface roughness (Ra) values (μm) were measured quantitatively by a surface analyzer. The mean values were compared using one-way ANOVA and Post Hoc Test. One specimen of each group was evaluated qualitatively under a scanning electron microscope(SEM) for surface topography. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: One-way ANOVA and Post Hoc Test. RESULTS: The lowest Ra value was found in Group 4-Roughened and polished with Optrafine ceramic polishing kit (Ra=0.47μm) as compared to Group 3-Roughened and polished with eZr polishing kit (Ra=0.49μm) and Group 5-Roughened and glazed (Ra=0.59μm). There was no stastistically significant difference between two polishing systems. SEM analysis of surfaces polished with Optrafine polishing kit revealed smoother and regular morphology as compared to surfaces polished with eZr polishing kit. CONCLUSION: The Optrafine polishing kit created more smoother and uniform surfaces as compared to surfaces polished with eZr polishing kit both quantitatively and qualitatively. Also, lowest surface roughness values were produced by optrafine ceramic polishing kit on monolithic zirconia as compared to glazed monolithic zirconia after their clinical adjustments.Thus Optrafine ceramic polishing kit can be used as alternative to glazing. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020 2020-04-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7335032/ /pubmed/32655223 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_339_19 Text en Copyright: © 2020 The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Gaonkar, Sneha Harishchandra
Aras, Meena Ajay
Chitre, Vidya
An in vitro study to compare the surface roughness of glazed and chairside polished dental monolithic zirconia using two polishing systems
title An in vitro study to compare the surface roughness of glazed and chairside polished dental monolithic zirconia using two polishing systems
title_full An in vitro study to compare the surface roughness of glazed and chairside polished dental monolithic zirconia using two polishing systems
title_fullStr An in vitro study to compare the surface roughness of glazed and chairside polished dental monolithic zirconia using two polishing systems
title_full_unstemmed An in vitro study to compare the surface roughness of glazed and chairside polished dental monolithic zirconia using two polishing systems
title_short An in vitro study to compare the surface roughness of glazed and chairside polished dental monolithic zirconia using two polishing systems
title_sort in vitro study to compare the surface roughness of glazed and chairside polished dental monolithic zirconia using two polishing systems
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7335032/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32655223
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_339_19
work_keys_str_mv AT gaonkarsnehaharishchandra aninvitrostudytocomparethesurfaceroughnessofglazedandchairsidepolisheddentalmonolithiczirconiausingtwopolishingsystems
AT arasmeenaajay aninvitrostudytocomparethesurfaceroughnessofglazedandchairsidepolisheddentalmonolithiczirconiausingtwopolishingsystems
AT chitrevidya aninvitrostudytocomparethesurfaceroughnessofglazedandchairsidepolisheddentalmonolithiczirconiausingtwopolishingsystems
AT gaonkarsnehaharishchandra invitrostudytocomparethesurfaceroughnessofglazedandchairsidepolisheddentalmonolithiczirconiausingtwopolishingsystems
AT arasmeenaajay invitrostudytocomparethesurfaceroughnessofglazedandchairsidepolisheddentalmonolithiczirconiausingtwopolishingsystems
AT chitrevidya invitrostudytocomparethesurfaceroughnessofglazedandchairsidepolisheddentalmonolithiczirconiausingtwopolishingsystems