Cargando…
The Role of Congruency for Distractor-Response Binding: A Caveat
Responding in the presence of stimuli leads to an integration of stimulus features and response features into event files, which can later be retrieved to assist action control. This integration mechanism is not limited to target stimuli, but can also include distractors (distractor-response binding...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
University of Economics and Human Sciences in Warsaw
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7335392/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32665798 http://dx.doi.org/10.5709/acp-0262-1 |
_version_ | 1783554127956017152 |
---|---|
author | Pfister, Roland Frings, Christian Moeller, Birte |
author_facet | Pfister, Roland Frings, Christian Moeller, Birte |
author_sort | Pfister, Roland |
collection | PubMed |
description | Responding in the presence of stimuli leads to an integration of stimulus features and response features into event files, which can later be retrieved to assist action control. This integration mechanism is not limited to target stimuli, but can also include distractors (distractor-response binding). A recurring research question is which factors determine whether or not distractors are integrated. One suggested candidate factor is target-distractor congruency: Distractor-response binding effects were reported to be stronger for congruent than for incongruent target-distractor pairs. Here, we discuss a general problem with including the factor of congruency in typical analyses used to study distractor-based binding effects. Integrating this factor leads to a confound that may explain any differences between distractor-response binding effects of congruent and incongruent distractors with a simple congruency effect. Simulation data confirmed this argument. We propose to interpret previous data cautiously and discuss potential avenues to circumvent this problem in the future. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7335392 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | University of Economics and Human Sciences in Warsaw |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73353922020-07-13 The Role of Congruency for Distractor-Response Binding: A Caveat Pfister, Roland Frings, Christian Moeller, Birte Adv Cogn Psychol Research Articles Responding in the presence of stimuli leads to an integration of stimulus features and response features into event files, which can later be retrieved to assist action control. This integration mechanism is not limited to target stimuli, but can also include distractors (distractor-response binding). A recurring research question is which factors determine whether or not distractors are integrated. One suggested candidate factor is target-distractor congruency: Distractor-response binding effects were reported to be stronger for congruent than for incongruent target-distractor pairs. Here, we discuss a general problem with including the factor of congruency in typical analyses used to study distractor-based binding effects. Integrating this factor leads to a confound that may explain any differences between distractor-response binding effects of congruent and incongruent distractors with a simple congruency effect. Simulation data confirmed this argument. We propose to interpret previous data cautiously and discuss potential avenues to circumvent this problem in the future. University of Economics and Human Sciences in Warsaw 2019-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7335392/ /pubmed/32665798 http://dx.doi.org/10.5709/acp-0262-1 Text en Copyright: © 2019 University of Economics and Human Sciences in Warsaw https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Pfister, Roland Frings, Christian Moeller, Birte The Role of Congruency for Distractor-Response Binding: A Caveat |
title | The Role of Congruency for Distractor-Response Binding: A Caveat |
title_full | The Role of Congruency for Distractor-Response Binding: A Caveat |
title_fullStr | The Role of Congruency for Distractor-Response Binding: A Caveat |
title_full_unstemmed | The Role of Congruency for Distractor-Response Binding: A Caveat |
title_short | The Role of Congruency for Distractor-Response Binding: A Caveat |
title_sort | role of congruency for distractor-response binding: a caveat |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7335392/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32665798 http://dx.doi.org/10.5709/acp-0262-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pfisterroland theroleofcongruencyfordistractorresponsebindingacaveat AT fringschristian theroleofcongruencyfordistractorresponsebindingacaveat AT moellerbirte theroleofcongruencyfordistractorresponsebindingacaveat AT pfisterroland roleofcongruencyfordistractorresponsebindingacaveat AT fringschristian roleofcongruencyfordistractorresponsebindingacaveat AT moellerbirte roleofcongruencyfordistractorresponsebindingacaveat |