Cargando…

Accuracy and efficiency of an artificial intelligence tool when counting breast mitoses

BACKGROUND: The mitotic count in breast carcinoma is an important prognostic marker. Unfortunately substantial inter- and intra-laboratory variation exists when pathologists manually count mitotic figures. Artificial intelligence (AI) coupled with whole slide imaging offers a potential solution to t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pantanowitz, Liron, Hartman, Douglas, Qi, Yan, Cho, Eun Yoon, Suh, Beomseok, Paeng, Kyunghyun, Dhir, Rajiv, Michelow, Pamela, Hazelhurst, Scott, Song, Sang Yong, Cho, Soo Youn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7335442/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32622359
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13000-020-00995-z
_version_ 1783554138320142336
author Pantanowitz, Liron
Hartman, Douglas
Qi, Yan
Cho, Eun Yoon
Suh, Beomseok
Paeng, Kyunghyun
Dhir, Rajiv
Michelow, Pamela
Hazelhurst, Scott
Song, Sang Yong
Cho, Soo Youn
author_facet Pantanowitz, Liron
Hartman, Douglas
Qi, Yan
Cho, Eun Yoon
Suh, Beomseok
Paeng, Kyunghyun
Dhir, Rajiv
Michelow, Pamela
Hazelhurst, Scott
Song, Sang Yong
Cho, Soo Youn
author_sort Pantanowitz, Liron
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The mitotic count in breast carcinoma is an important prognostic marker. Unfortunately substantial inter- and intra-laboratory variation exists when pathologists manually count mitotic figures. Artificial intelligence (AI) coupled with whole slide imaging offers a potential solution to this problem. The aim of this study was to accordingly critique an AI tool developed to quantify mitotic figures in whole slide images of invasive breast ductal carcinoma. METHODS: A representative H&E slide from 320 breast invasive ductal carcinoma cases was scanned at 40x magnification. Ten expert pathologists from two academic medical centers labeled mitotic figures in whole slide images to train and validate an AI algorithm to detect and count mitoses. Thereafter, 24 readers of varying expertise were asked to count mitotic figures with and without AI support in 140 high-power fields derived from a separate dataset. Their accuracy and efficiency of performing these tasks were calculated and statistical comparisons performed. RESULTS: For each experience level the accuracy, precision and sensitivity of counting mitoses by users improved with AI support. There were 21 readers (87.5%) that identified more mitoses using AI support and 13 reviewers (54.2%) that decreased the quantity of falsely flagged mitoses with AI. More time was spent on this task for most participants when not provided with AI support. AI assistance resulted in an overall time savings of 27.8%. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that pathology end-users were more accurate and efficient at quantifying mitotic figures in digital images of invasive breast carcinoma with the aid of AI. Higher inter-pathologist agreement with AI assistance suggests that such algorithms can also help standardize practice. Not surprisingly, there is much enthusiasm in pathology regarding the prospect of using AI in routine practice to perform mundane tasks such as counting mitoses.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7335442
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73354422020-07-07 Accuracy and efficiency of an artificial intelligence tool when counting breast mitoses Pantanowitz, Liron Hartman, Douglas Qi, Yan Cho, Eun Yoon Suh, Beomseok Paeng, Kyunghyun Dhir, Rajiv Michelow, Pamela Hazelhurst, Scott Song, Sang Yong Cho, Soo Youn Diagn Pathol Research BACKGROUND: The mitotic count in breast carcinoma is an important prognostic marker. Unfortunately substantial inter- and intra-laboratory variation exists when pathologists manually count mitotic figures. Artificial intelligence (AI) coupled with whole slide imaging offers a potential solution to this problem. The aim of this study was to accordingly critique an AI tool developed to quantify mitotic figures in whole slide images of invasive breast ductal carcinoma. METHODS: A representative H&E slide from 320 breast invasive ductal carcinoma cases was scanned at 40x magnification. Ten expert pathologists from two academic medical centers labeled mitotic figures in whole slide images to train and validate an AI algorithm to detect and count mitoses. Thereafter, 24 readers of varying expertise were asked to count mitotic figures with and without AI support in 140 high-power fields derived from a separate dataset. Their accuracy and efficiency of performing these tasks were calculated and statistical comparisons performed. RESULTS: For each experience level the accuracy, precision and sensitivity of counting mitoses by users improved with AI support. There were 21 readers (87.5%) that identified more mitoses using AI support and 13 reviewers (54.2%) that decreased the quantity of falsely flagged mitoses with AI. More time was spent on this task for most participants when not provided with AI support. AI assistance resulted in an overall time savings of 27.8%. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that pathology end-users were more accurate and efficient at quantifying mitotic figures in digital images of invasive breast carcinoma with the aid of AI. Higher inter-pathologist agreement with AI assistance suggests that such algorithms can also help standardize practice. Not surprisingly, there is much enthusiasm in pathology regarding the prospect of using AI in routine practice to perform mundane tasks such as counting mitoses. BioMed Central 2020-07-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7335442/ /pubmed/32622359 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13000-020-00995-z Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Pantanowitz, Liron
Hartman, Douglas
Qi, Yan
Cho, Eun Yoon
Suh, Beomseok
Paeng, Kyunghyun
Dhir, Rajiv
Michelow, Pamela
Hazelhurst, Scott
Song, Sang Yong
Cho, Soo Youn
Accuracy and efficiency of an artificial intelligence tool when counting breast mitoses
title Accuracy and efficiency of an artificial intelligence tool when counting breast mitoses
title_full Accuracy and efficiency of an artificial intelligence tool when counting breast mitoses
title_fullStr Accuracy and efficiency of an artificial intelligence tool when counting breast mitoses
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy and efficiency of an artificial intelligence tool when counting breast mitoses
title_short Accuracy and efficiency of an artificial intelligence tool when counting breast mitoses
title_sort accuracy and efficiency of an artificial intelligence tool when counting breast mitoses
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7335442/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32622359
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13000-020-00995-z
work_keys_str_mv AT pantanowitzliron accuracyandefficiencyofanartificialintelligencetoolwhencountingbreastmitoses
AT hartmandouglas accuracyandefficiencyofanartificialintelligencetoolwhencountingbreastmitoses
AT qiyan accuracyandefficiencyofanartificialintelligencetoolwhencountingbreastmitoses
AT choeunyoon accuracyandefficiencyofanartificialintelligencetoolwhencountingbreastmitoses
AT suhbeomseok accuracyandefficiencyofanartificialintelligencetoolwhencountingbreastmitoses
AT paengkyunghyun accuracyandefficiencyofanartificialintelligencetoolwhencountingbreastmitoses
AT dhirrajiv accuracyandefficiencyofanartificialintelligencetoolwhencountingbreastmitoses
AT michelowpamela accuracyandefficiencyofanartificialintelligencetoolwhencountingbreastmitoses
AT hazelhurstscott accuracyandefficiencyofanartificialintelligencetoolwhencountingbreastmitoses
AT songsangyong accuracyandefficiencyofanartificialintelligencetoolwhencountingbreastmitoses
AT chosooyoun accuracyandefficiencyofanartificialintelligencetoolwhencountingbreastmitoses