Cargando…

Evaluation of hospital disaster preparedness by a multi-criteria decision making approach: The case of Turkish hospitals

Considering the unexpected emergence of natural and man-made disasters over the world and Turkey, the importance of preparedness of hospitals, which are the first reference points for people to get healthcare services, becomes clear. Determining the level of disaster preparedness of hospitals is an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ortiz-Barrios, Miguel, Gul, Muhammet, López-Meza, Pedro, Yucesan, Melih, Navarro-Jiménez, Eduardo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Ltd. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7335495/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32834973
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101748
_version_ 1783554147806609408
author Ortiz-Barrios, Miguel
Gul, Muhammet
López-Meza, Pedro
Yucesan, Melih
Navarro-Jiménez, Eduardo
author_facet Ortiz-Barrios, Miguel
Gul, Muhammet
López-Meza, Pedro
Yucesan, Melih
Navarro-Jiménez, Eduardo
author_sort Ortiz-Barrios, Miguel
collection PubMed
description Considering the unexpected emergence of natural and man-made disasters over the world and Turkey, the importance of preparedness of hospitals, which are the first reference points for people to get healthcare services, becomes clear. Determining the level of disaster preparedness of hospitals is an important and necessary issue. This is because identifying hospitals with low level of preparedness is crucial for disaster preparedness planning. In this study, a hybrid fuzzy decision making model was proposed to evaluate the disaster preparedness of hospitals. This model was developed using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP)-fuzzy decision making trial and evaluation laboratory (FDEMATEL)-technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solutions (TOPSIS) techniques and aimed to determine a ranking for hospital disaster preparedness. FAHP is used to determine weights of six main criteria (including hospital buildings, equipment, communication, transportation, personnel, flexibility) and a total of thirty-six sub-criteria regarding disaster preparedness. At the same time, FDEMATEL is applied to uncover the interdependence between criteria and sub-criteria. Finally, TOPSIS is used to obtain ranking of hospitals. To provide inputs for TOPSIS implementation, some key performance indicators are established and related data is gathered by the aid of experts from the assessed hospitals. A case study considering 4 hospitals from the Turkish healthcare sector was used to demonstrate the proposed approach. The results evidenced that Personnel is the most important factor (global weight = 0.280) when evaluating the hospital preparedness while Flexibility has the greatest prominence (c + r = 23.09).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7335495
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73354952020-07-06 Evaluation of hospital disaster preparedness by a multi-criteria decision making approach: The case of Turkish hospitals Ortiz-Barrios, Miguel Gul, Muhammet López-Meza, Pedro Yucesan, Melih Navarro-Jiménez, Eduardo Int J Disaster Risk Reduct Article Considering the unexpected emergence of natural and man-made disasters over the world and Turkey, the importance of preparedness of hospitals, which are the first reference points for people to get healthcare services, becomes clear. Determining the level of disaster preparedness of hospitals is an important and necessary issue. This is because identifying hospitals with low level of preparedness is crucial for disaster preparedness planning. In this study, a hybrid fuzzy decision making model was proposed to evaluate the disaster preparedness of hospitals. This model was developed using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP)-fuzzy decision making trial and evaluation laboratory (FDEMATEL)-technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solutions (TOPSIS) techniques and aimed to determine a ranking for hospital disaster preparedness. FAHP is used to determine weights of six main criteria (including hospital buildings, equipment, communication, transportation, personnel, flexibility) and a total of thirty-six sub-criteria regarding disaster preparedness. At the same time, FDEMATEL is applied to uncover the interdependence between criteria and sub-criteria. Finally, TOPSIS is used to obtain ranking of hospitals. To provide inputs for TOPSIS implementation, some key performance indicators are established and related data is gathered by the aid of experts from the assessed hospitals. A case study considering 4 hospitals from the Turkish healthcare sector was used to demonstrate the proposed approach. The results evidenced that Personnel is the most important factor (global weight = 0.280) when evaluating the hospital preparedness while Flexibility has the greatest prominence (c + r = 23.09). Elsevier Ltd. 2020-10 2020-07-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7335495/ /pubmed/32834973 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101748 Text en © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Ortiz-Barrios, Miguel
Gul, Muhammet
López-Meza, Pedro
Yucesan, Melih
Navarro-Jiménez, Eduardo
Evaluation of hospital disaster preparedness by a multi-criteria decision making approach: The case of Turkish hospitals
title Evaluation of hospital disaster preparedness by a multi-criteria decision making approach: The case of Turkish hospitals
title_full Evaluation of hospital disaster preparedness by a multi-criteria decision making approach: The case of Turkish hospitals
title_fullStr Evaluation of hospital disaster preparedness by a multi-criteria decision making approach: The case of Turkish hospitals
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of hospital disaster preparedness by a multi-criteria decision making approach: The case of Turkish hospitals
title_short Evaluation of hospital disaster preparedness by a multi-criteria decision making approach: The case of Turkish hospitals
title_sort evaluation of hospital disaster preparedness by a multi-criteria decision making approach: the case of turkish hospitals
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7335495/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32834973
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101748
work_keys_str_mv AT ortizbarriosmiguel evaluationofhospitaldisasterpreparednessbyamulticriteriadecisionmakingapproachthecaseofturkishhospitals
AT gulmuhammet evaluationofhospitaldisasterpreparednessbyamulticriteriadecisionmakingapproachthecaseofturkishhospitals
AT lopezmezapedro evaluationofhospitaldisasterpreparednessbyamulticriteriadecisionmakingapproachthecaseofturkishhospitals
AT yucesanmelih evaluationofhospitaldisasterpreparednessbyamulticriteriadecisionmakingapproachthecaseofturkishhospitals
AT navarrojimenezeduardo evaluationofhospitaldisasterpreparednessbyamulticriteriadecisionmakingapproachthecaseofturkishhospitals