Cargando…
Evaluation of hospital disaster preparedness by a multi-criteria decision making approach: The case of Turkish hospitals
Considering the unexpected emergence of natural and man-made disasters over the world and Turkey, the importance of preparedness of hospitals, which are the first reference points for people to get healthcare services, becomes clear. Determining the level of disaster preparedness of hospitals is an...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier Ltd.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7335495/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32834973 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101748 |
_version_ | 1783554147806609408 |
---|---|
author | Ortiz-Barrios, Miguel Gul, Muhammet López-Meza, Pedro Yucesan, Melih Navarro-Jiménez, Eduardo |
author_facet | Ortiz-Barrios, Miguel Gul, Muhammet López-Meza, Pedro Yucesan, Melih Navarro-Jiménez, Eduardo |
author_sort | Ortiz-Barrios, Miguel |
collection | PubMed |
description | Considering the unexpected emergence of natural and man-made disasters over the world and Turkey, the importance of preparedness of hospitals, which are the first reference points for people to get healthcare services, becomes clear. Determining the level of disaster preparedness of hospitals is an important and necessary issue. This is because identifying hospitals with low level of preparedness is crucial for disaster preparedness planning. In this study, a hybrid fuzzy decision making model was proposed to evaluate the disaster preparedness of hospitals. This model was developed using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP)-fuzzy decision making trial and evaluation laboratory (FDEMATEL)-technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solutions (TOPSIS) techniques and aimed to determine a ranking for hospital disaster preparedness. FAHP is used to determine weights of six main criteria (including hospital buildings, equipment, communication, transportation, personnel, flexibility) and a total of thirty-six sub-criteria regarding disaster preparedness. At the same time, FDEMATEL is applied to uncover the interdependence between criteria and sub-criteria. Finally, TOPSIS is used to obtain ranking of hospitals. To provide inputs for TOPSIS implementation, some key performance indicators are established and related data is gathered by the aid of experts from the assessed hospitals. A case study considering 4 hospitals from the Turkish healthcare sector was used to demonstrate the proposed approach. The results evidenced that Personnel is the most important factor (global weight = 0.280) when evaluating the hospital preparedness while Flexibility has the greatest prominence (c + r = 23.09). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7335495 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Elsevier Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73354952020-07-06 Evaluation of hospital disaster preparedness by a multi-criteria decision making approach: The case of Turkish hospitals Ortiz-Barrios, Miguel Gul, Muhammet López-Meza, Pedro Yucesan, Melih Navarro-Jiménez, Eduardo Int J Disaster Risk Reduct Article Considering the unexpected emergence of natural and man-made disasters over the world and Turkey, the importance of preparedness of hospitals, which are the first reference points for people to get healthcare services, becomes clear. Determining the level of disaster preparedness of hospitals is an important and necessary issue. This is because identifying hospitals with low level of preparedness is crucial for disaster preparedness planning. In this study, a hybrid fuzzy decision making model was proposed to evaluate the disaster preparedness of hospitals. This model was developed using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP)-fuzzy decision making trial and evaluation laboratory (FDEMATEL)-technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solutions (TOPSIS) techniques and aimed to determine a ranking for hospital disaster preparedness. FAHP is used to determine weights of six main criteria (including hospital buildings, equipment, communication, transportation, personnel, flexibility) and a total of thirty-six sub-criteria regarding disaster preparedness. At the same time, FDEMATEL is applied to uncover the interdependence between criteria and sub-criteria. Finally, TOPSIS is used to obtain ranking of hospitals. To provide inputs for TOPSIS implementation, some key performance indicators are established and related data is gathered by the aid of experts from the assessed hospitals. A case study considering 4 hospitals from the Turkish healthcare sector was used to demonstrate the proposed approach. The results evidenced that Personnel is the most important factor (global weight = 0.280) when evaluating the hospital preparedness while Flexibility has the greatest prominence (c + r = 23.09). Elsevier Ltd. 2020-10 2020-07-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7335495/ /pubmed/32834973 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101748 Text en © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Article Ortiz-Barrios, Miguel Gul, Muhammet López-Meza, Pedro Yucesan, Melih Navarro-Jiménez, Eduardo Evaluation of hospital disaster preparedness by a multi-criteria decision making approach: The case of Turkish hospitals |
title | Evaluation of hospital disaster preparedness by a multi-criteria decision making approach: The case of Turkish hospitals |
title_full | Evaluation of hospital disaster preparedness by a multi-criteria decision making approach: The case of Turkish hospitals |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of hospital disaster preparedness by a multi-criteria decision making approach: The case of Turkish hospitals |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of hospital disaster preparedness by a multi-criteria decision making approach: The case of Turkish hospitals |
title_short | Evaluation of hospital disaster preparedness by a multi-criteria decision making approach: The case of Turkish hospitals |
title_sort | evaluation of hospital disaster preparedness by a multi-criteria decision making approach: the case of turkish hospitals |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7335495/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32834973 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101748 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ortizbarriosmiguel evaluationofhospitaldisasterpreparednessbyamulticriteriadecisionmakingapproachthecaseofturkishhospitals AT gulmuhammet evaluationofhospitaldisasterpreparednessbyamulticriteriadecisionmakingapproachthecaseofturkishhospitals AT lopezmezapedro evaluationofhospitaldisasterpreparednessbyamulticriteriadecisionmakingapproachthecaseofturkishhospitals AT yucesanmelih evaluationofhospitaldisasterpreparednessbyamulticriteriadecisionmakingapproachthecaseofturkishhospitals AT navarrojimenezeduardo evaluationofhospitaldisasterpreparednessbyamulticriteriadecisionmakingapproachthecaseofturkishhospitals |