Cargando…

Effects of vegetation restoration on soil quality in fragile karst ecosystems of southwest China

Soil quality assessment is important for karst ecosystems where soil erosion is significant. A large amount of vegetation restoration has been implemented since the early 21st century in degraded karst areas across southwestern China. However, the impacts on soil quality of different restoration typ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guan, Huiling, Fan, Jiangwen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7335502/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32676227
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.9456
_version_ 1783554149176049664
author Guan, Huiling
Fan, Jiangwen
author_facet Guan, Huiling
Fan, Jiangwen
author_sort Guan, Huiling
collection PubMed
description Soil quality assessment is important for karst ecosystems where soil erosion is significant. A large amount of vegetation restoration has been implemented since the early 21st century in degraded karst areas across southwestern China. However, the impacts on soil quality of different restoration types rarely have been compared systematically. In the current study, we investigated the soil quality after a number of vegetation restoration projects as well as their adjacent cropland by analyzing soil samples. Six vegetation restoration types were evaluated, including one natural restoration (natural shrubland, protected for 13 years), three economic forests (4 years Eucalyptus robusta, 4 years Prunus salicina and 6 years Zenia insignis) and two mixed forests (1 year Juglans regia–crop and 13 years Toona sinensis-Pennisetum purpureum ). We evaluated the benefits of different restoration types more accurately by setting each adjacent cropland as the control and setting the variation between the corresponding restored and control site as the evaluation object so that the background differences of six sites could be eliminated. The results indicated that natural shrubland, Toona sinensis-Pennisetum purpureum and Zenia insignis were effective in improving soil quality index (SQI) in degraded karst cropland largely due to their higher SOC and TN content. The variation of SQI (VSQI) of natural shrubland was significantly higher than that in Eucalyptus robusta, Prunus salicina and Juglans regia-crop in total soil layer (0–30 cm) (P < 0.05), indicating natural shrubland had better capacity to improve soil quality. The boosting regression tree model revealed that vegetation restoration type explained 73.49% and restoration time explained 10.30% of the variation in VSQI, which confirmed that vegetation restoration type and restoration time are critical for achieving soil reserves. Therefore, it is vital to select appropriate vegetation type in restoration projects and recovery for a long time in order to achieve better soil quality. The current study provides a theoretical basis on which to assess the effects of different vegetation restoration types on the heterogeneous degraded karst areas.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7335502
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73355022020-07-15 Effects of vegetation restoration on soil quality in fragile karst ecosystems of southwest China Guan, Huiling Fan, Jiangwen PeerJ Ecology Soil quality assessment is important for karst ecosystems where soil erosion is significant. A large amount of vegetation restoration has been implemented since the early 21st century in degraded karst areas across southwestern China. However, the impacts on soil quality of different restoration types rarely have been compared systematically. In the current study, we investigated the soil quality after a number of vegetation restoration projects as well as their adjacent cropland by analyzing soil samples. Six vegetation restoration types were evaluated, including one natural restoration (natural shrubland, protected for 13 years), three economic forests (4 years Eucalyptus robusta, 4 years Prunus salicina and 6 years Zenia insignis) and two mixed forests (1 year Juglans regia–crop and 13 years Toona sinensis-Pennisetum purpureum ). We evaluated the benefits of different restoration types more accurately by setting each adjacent cropland as the control and setting the variation between the corresponding restored and control site as the evaluation object so that the background differences of six sites could be eliminated. The results indicated that natural shrubland, Toona sinensis-Pennisetum purpureum and Zenia insignis were effective in improving soil quality index (SQI) in degraded karst cropland largely due to their higher SOC and TN content. The variation of SQI (VSQI) of natural shrubland was significantly higher than that in Eucalyptus robusta, Prunus salicina and Juglans regia-crop in total soil layer (0–30 cm) (P < 0.05), indicating natural shrubland had better capacity to improve soil quality. The boosting regression tree model revealed that vegetation restoration type explained 73.49% and restoration time explained 10.30% of the variation in VSQI, which confirmed that vegetation restoration type and restoration time are critical for achieving soil reserves. Therefore, it is vital to select appropriate vegetation type in restoration projects and recovery for a long time in order to achieve better soil quality. The current study provides a theoretical basis on which to assess the effects of different vegetation restoration types on the heterogeneous degraded karst areas. PeerJ Inc. 2020-07-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7335502/ /pubmed/32676227 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.9456 Text en © 2020 Guan and Fan https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Ecology
Guan, Huiling
Fan, Jiangwen
Effects of vegetation restoration on soil quality in fragile karst ecosystems of southwest China
title Effects of vegetation restoration on soil quality in fragile karst ecosystems of southwest China
title_full Effects of vegetation restoration on soil quality in fragile karst ecosystems of southwest China
title_fullStr Effects of vegetation restoration on soil quality in fragile karst ecosystems of southwest China
title_full_unstemmed Effects of vegetation restoration on soil quality in fragile karst ecosystems of southwest China
title_short Effects of vegetation restoration on soil quality in fragile karst ecosystems of southwest China
title_sort effects of vegetation restoration on soil quality in fragile karst ecosystems of southwest china
topic Ecology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7335502/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32676227
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.9456
work_keys_str_mv AT guanhuiling effectsofvegetationrestorationonsoilqualityinfragilekarstecosystemsofsouthwestchina
AT fanjiangwen effectsofvegetationrestorationonsoilqualityinfragilekarstecosystemsofsouthwestchina