Cargando…

Erector Spinae Plane Block for Lumbar Spinal Surgery: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND: Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) as a new trunk fascia block technique was proposed in 2016. ESPB has aroused the interest of many nerve block experts. However, there are few clinical studies on ESPB for lumbar surgery, and its effectiveness and safety are controversial. The goal of thi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Qiu, Yong, Zhang, Teng-Jiao, Hua, Zhen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7335845/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32669870
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S256205
_version_ 1783554201565003776
author Qiu, Yong
Zhang, Teng-Jiao
Hua, Zhen
author_facet Qiu, Yong
Zhang, Teng-Jiao
Hua, Zhen
author_sort Qiu, Yong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) as a new trunk fascia block technique was proposed in 2016. ESPB has aroused the interest of many nerve block experts. However, there are few clinical studies on ESPB for lumbar surgery, and its effectiveness and safety are controversial. The goal of this review is to summarize the use of ESPB for lumbar spine surgery in order to better understand this technique. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane library and ClinicalTrial.gov databases were searched up to July 30, 2019. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria established in advance, “lumbar spine surgery” and “ESPB” related MesH terms and free-text words were used. Data on pain scores, analgesic consumptions and adverse effects were reported. All processes follow PRISMA statement guidelines. RESULTS: A total of 171 participants from 11 publications were identified, including two randomized controlled trials (RCTs), one retrospective cohort study, four case reports and four cases series. Block operation planes from T8 to L4. The main anesthetics used in the block are bupivacaine, ropivacaine and lidocaine. There was evidence for reducing postoperative pain scores and analgesic consumptions. CONCLUSION: The effectiveness and safety of ESPB for lumbar spine surgery are still controversial. The current evidence is insufficient to support the widespread use of ESPB for lumbar spine surgery. High-quality RCTs are urgently needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7335845
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73358452020-07-14 Erector Spinae Plane Block for Lumbar Spinal Surgery: A Systematic Review Qiu, Yong Zhang, Teng-Jiao Hua, Zhen J Pain Res Review BACKGROUND: Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) as a new trunk fascia block technique was proposed in 2016. ESPB has aroused the interest of many nerve block experts. However, there are few clinical studies on ESPB for lumbar surgery, and its effectiveness and safety are controversial. The goal of this review is to summarize the use of ESPB for lumbar spine surgery in order to better understand this technique. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane library and ClinicalTrial.gov databases were searched up to July 30, 2019. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria established in advance, “lumbar spine surgery” and “ESPB” related MesH terms and free-text words were used. Data on pain scores, analgesic consumptions and adverse effects were reported. All processes follow PRISMA statement guidelines. RESULTS: A total of 171 participants from 11 publications were identified, including two randomized controlled trials (RCTs), one retrospective cohort study, four case reports and four cases series. Block operation planes from T8 to L4. The main anesthetics used in the block are bupivacaine, ropivacaine and lidocaine. There was evidence for reducing postoperative pain scores and analgesic consumptions. CONCLUSION: The effectiveness and safety of ESPB for lumbar spine surgery are still controversial. The current evidence is insufficient to support the widespread use of ESPB for lumbar spine surgery. High-quality RCTs are urgently needed. Dove 2020-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7335845/ /pubmed/32669870 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S256205 Text en © 2020 Qiu et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Review
Qiu, Yong
Zhang, Teng-Jiao
Hua, Zhen
Erector Spinae Plane Block for Lumbar Spinal Surgery: A Systematic Review
title Erector Spinae Plane Block for Lumbar Spinal Surgery: A Systematic Review
title_full Erector Spinae Plane Block for Lumbar Spinal Surgery: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Erector Spinae Plane Block for Lumbar Spinal Surgery: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Erector Spinae Plane Block for Lumbar Spinal Surgery: A Systematic Review
title_short Erector Spinae Plane Block for Lumbar Spinal Surgery: A Systematic Review
title_sort erector spinae plane block for lumbar spinal surgery: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7335845/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32669870
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S256205
work_keys_str_mv AT qiuyong erectorspinaeplaneblockforlumbarspinalsurgeryasystematicreview
AT zhangtengjiao erectorspinaeplaneblockforlumbarspinalsurgeryasystematicreview
AT huazhen erectorspinaeplaneblockforlumbarspinalsurgeryasystematicreview