Cargando…

Review of Clinical Outcome Assessments in Pediatric Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder

PURPOSE: Various clinical outcome assessments (COAs) are used in clinical research to assess and monitor treatment efficacy in pediatric attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) trials. It is unclear whether the concepts assessed are those that are important to patients and their caregivers....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Markowitz, Jessica T, Oberdhan, Dorothee, Ciesluk, Anna, Rams, Alissa, Wigal, Sharon B
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7335865/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32669845
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S248685
_version_ 1783554207227314176
author Markowitz, Jessica T
Oberdhan, Dorothee
Ciesluk, Anna
Rams, Alissa
Wigal, Sharon B
author_facet Markowitz, Jessica T
Oberdhan, Dorothee
Ciesluk, Anna
Rams, Alissa
Wigal, Sharon B
author_sort Markowitz, Jessica T
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Various clinical outcome assessments (COAs) are used in clinical research to assess and monitor treatment efficacy in pediatric attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) trials. It is unclear whether the concepts assessed are those that are important to patients and their caregivers. The concepts measured by commonly used COAs in this population have not been explicitly compared. METHODS: We conducted reviews of the qualitative literature to extract information on pediatric ADHD-related concepts reported by pediatric patients, parents, and teachers. Using these concepts, we developed a conceptual framework of pediatric ADHD using both the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) criteria and the additional symptoms and behavioral impacts identified in the literature. We searched for COAs that have been used in pediatric ADHD research and mapped their items based on their conceptual underpinning. RESULTS: Of the 27 COAs found in the empirical literature, 4 COAs assessed only DSM symptoms. The most comprehensive coverage of our conceptual framework was seen in the Swanson, Nolan, and Pelham Rating Scale–DSM-IV (SNAP-IV). Eighteen COAs were used in at least 1 clinical trial: ADHD-Rating Scale-IV (ADHD-RS-IV) was used most often (n=77), followed by SNAP-IV (n=50), Swanson, Kotkin, Agler, M-Flynn, and Pelham Scale (SKAMP; n=31), Weiss Functional Impairment Rating Scale (WFIRS; n=24), and Vanderbilt ADHD Diagnostic Rating Scale (VADRS; n=15). CONCLUSION: We identified symptoms and behavioral impacts from qualitative studies in pediatric ADHD that are not included in DSM-based criteria. Most COAs used in pediatric ADHD clinical trials measure only those symptoms listed in the DSM. While these COAs can measure symptom severity, they may not assess the full range of symptoms and impacts important to patients and their caregivers. Future research is needed to measure all concepts important to patients and caregivers within ADHD clinical trials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7335865
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73358652020-07-14 Review of Clinical Outcome Assessments in Pediatric Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Markowitz, Jessica T Oberdhan, Dorothee Ciesluk, Anna Rams, Alissa Wigal, Sharon B Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat Original Research PURPOSE: Various clinical outcome assessments (COAs) are used in clinical research to assess and monitor treatment efficacy in pediatric attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) trials. It is unclear whether the concepts assessed are those that are important to patients and their caregivers. The concepts measured by commonly used COAs in this population have not been explicitly compared. METHODS: We conducted reviews of the qualitative literature to extract information on pediatric ADHD-related concepts reported by pediatric patients, parents, and teachers. Using these concepts, we developed a conceptual framework of pediatric ADHD using both the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) criteria and the additional symptoms and behavioral impacts identified in the literature. We searched for COAs that have been used in pediatric ADHD research and mapped their items based on their conceptual underpinning. RESULTS: Of the 27 COAs found in the empirical literature, 4 COAs assessed only DSM symptoms. The most comprehensive coverage of our conceptual framework was seen in the Swanson, Nolan, and Pelham Rating Scale–DSM-IV (SNAP-IV). Eighteen COAs were used in at least 1 clinical trial: ADHD-Rating Scale-IV (ADHD-RS-IV) was used most often (n=77), followed by SNAP-IV (n=50), Swanson, Kotkin, Agler, M-Flynn, and Pelham Scale (SKAMP; n=31), Weiss Functional Impairment Rating Scale (WFIRS; n=24), and Vanderbilt ADHD Diagnostic Rating Scale (VADRS; n=15). CONCLUSION: We identified symptoms and behavioral impacts from qualitative studies in pediatric ADHD that are not included in DSM-based criteria. Most COAs used in pediatric ADHD clinical trials measure only those symptoms listed in the DSM. While these COAs can measure symptom severity, they may not assess the full range of symptoms and impacts important to patients and their caregivers. Future research is needed to measure all concepts important to patients and caregivers within ADHD clinical trials. Dove 2020-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7335865/ /pubmed/32669845 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S248685 Text en © 2020 Markowitz et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Markowitz, Jessica T
Oberdhan, Dorothee
Ciesluk, Anna
Rams, Alissa
Wigal, Sharon B
Review of Clinical Outcome Assessments in Pediatric Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
title Review of Clinical Outcome Assessments in Pediatric Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
title_full Review of Clinical Outcome Assessments in Pediatric Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
title_fullStr Review of Clinical Outcome Assessments in Pediatric Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
title_full_unstemmed Review of Clinical Outcome Assessments in Pediatric Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
title_short Review of Clinical Outcome Assessments in Pediatric Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
title_sort review of clinical outcome assessments in pediatric attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7335865/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32669845
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S248685
work_keys_str_mv AT markowitzjessicat reviewofclinicaloutcomeassessmentsinpediatricattentiondeficithyperactivitydisorder
AT oberdhandorothee reviewofclinicaloutcomeassessmentsinpediatricattentiondeficithyperactivitydisorder
AT cieslukanna reviewofclinicaloutcomeassessmentsinpediatricattentiondeficithyperactivitydisorder
AT ramsalissa reviewofclinicaloutcomeassessmentsinpediatricattentiondeficithyperactivitydisorder
AT wigalsharonb reviewofclinicaloutcomeassessmentsinpediatricattentiondeficithyperactivitydisorder