Cargando…
Review of Clinical Outcome Assessments in Pediatric Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
PURPOSE: Various clinical outcome assessments (COAs) are used in clinical research to assess and monitor treatment efficacy in pediatric attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) trials. It is unclear whether the concepts assessed are those that are important to patients and their caregivers....
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7335865/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32669845 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S248685 |
_version_ | 1783554207227314176 |
---|---|
author | Markowitz, Jessica T Oberdhan, Dorothee Ciesluk, Anna Rams, Alissa Wigal, Sharon B |
author_facet | Markowitz, Jessica T Oberdhan, Dorothee Ciesluk, Anna Rams, Alissa Wigal, Sharon B |
author_sort | Markowitz, Jessica T |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Various clinical outcome assessments (COAs) are used in clinical research to assess and monitor treatment efficacy in pediatric attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) trials. It is unclear whether the concepts assessed are those that are important to patients and their caregivers. The concepts measured by commonly used COAs in this population have not been explicitly compared. METHODS: We conducted reviews of the qualitative literature to extract information on pediatric ADHD-related concepts reported by pediatric patients, parents, and teachers. Using these concepts, we developed a conceptual framework of pediatric ADHD using both the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) criteria and the additional symptoms and behavioral impacts identified in the literature. We searched for COAs that have been used in pediatric ADHD research and mapped their items based on their conceptual underpinning. RESULTS: Of the 27 COAs found in the empirical literature, 4 COAs assessed only DSM symptoms. The most comprehensive coverage of our conceptual framework was seen in the Swanson, Nolan, and Pelham Rating Scale–DSM-IV (SNAP-IV). Eighteen COAs were used in at least 1 clinical trial: ADHD-Rating Scale-IV (ADHD-RS-IV) was used most often (n=77), followed by SNAP-IV (n=50), Swanson, Kotkin, Agler, M-Flynn, and Pelham Scale (SKAMP; n=31), Weiss Functional Impairment Rating Scale (WFIRS; n=24), and Vanderbilt ADHD Diagnostic Rating Scale (VADRS; n=15). CONCLUSION: We identified symptoms and behavioral impacts from qualitative studies in pediatric ADHD that are not included in DSM-based criteria. Most COAs used in pediatric ADHD clinical trials measure only those symptoms listed in the DSM. While these COAs can measure symptom severity, they may not assess the full range of symptoms and impacts important to patients and their caregivers. Future research is needed to measure all concepts important to patients and caregivers within ADHD clinical trials. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7335865 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73358652020-07-14 Review of Clinical Outcome Assessments in Pediatric Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Markowitz, Jessica T Oberdhan, Dorothee Ciesluk, Anna Rams, Alissa Wigal, Sharon B Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat Original Research PURPOSE: Various clinical outcome assessments (COAs) are used in clinical research to assess and monitor treatment efficacy in pediatric attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) trials. It is unclear whether the concepts assessed are those that are important to patients and their caregivers. The concepts measured by commonly used COAs in this population have not been explicitly compared. METHODS: We conducted reviews of the qualitative literature to extract information on pediatric ADHD-related concepts reported by pediatric patients, parents, and teachers. Using these concepts, we developed a conceptual framework of pediatric ADHD using both the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) criteria and the additional symptoms and behavioral impacts identified in the literature. We searched for COAs that have been used in pediatric ADHD research and mapped their items based on their conceptual underpinning. RESULTS: Of the 27 COAs found in the empirical literature, 4 COAs assessed only DSM symptoms. The most comprehensive coverage of our conceptual framework was seen in the Swanson, Nolan, and Pelham Rating Scale–DSM-IV (SNAP-IV). Eighteen COAs were used in at least 1 clinical trial: ADHD-Rating Scale-IV (ADHD-RS-IV) was used most often (n=77), followed by SNAP-IV (n=50), Swanson, Kotkin, Agler, M-Flynn, and Pelham Scale (SKAMP; n=31), Weiss Functional Impairment Rating Scale (WFIRS; n=24), and Vanderbilt ADHD Diagnostic Rating Scale (VADRS; n=15). CONCLUSION: We identified symptoms and behavioral impacts from qualitative studies in pediatric ADHD that are not included in DSM-based criteria. Most COAs used in pediatric ADHD clinical trials measure only those symptoms listed in the DSM. While these COAs can measure symptom severity, they may not assess the full range of symptoms and impacts important to patients and their caregivers. Future research is needed to measure all concepts important to patients and caregivers within ADHD clinical trials. Dove 2020-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7335865/ /pubmed/32669845 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S248685 Text en © 2020 Markowitz et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Markowitz, Jessica T Oberdhan, Dorothee Ciesluk, Anna Rams, Alissa Wigal, Sharon B Review of Clinical Outcome Assessments in Pediatric Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder |
title | Review of Clinical Outcome Assessments in Pediatric Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder |
title_full | Review of Clinical Outcome Assessments in Pediatric Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder |
title_fullStr | Review of Clinical Outcome Assessments in Pediatric Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder |
title_full_unstemmed | Review of Clinical Outcome Assessments in Pediatric Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder |
title_short | Review of Clinical Outcome Assessments in Pediatric Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder |
title_sort | review of clinical outcome assessments in pediatric attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7335865/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32669845 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S248685 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT markowitzjessicat reviewofclinicaloutcomeassessmentsinpediatricattentiondeficithyperactivitydisorder AT oberdhandorothee reviewofclinicaloutcomeassessmentsinpediatricattentiondeficithyperactivitydisorder AT cieslukanna reviewofclinicaloutcomeassessmentsinpediatricattentiondeficithyperactivitydisorder AT ramsalissa reviewofclinicaloutcomeassessmentsinpediatricattentiondeficithyperactivitydisorder AT wigalsharonb reviewofclinicaloutcomeassessmentsinpediatricattentiondeficithyperactivitydisorder |