Cargando…
The impact of restricted length of treatment field and anthropometric factors on selection of head and neck cancer patients for treatment on the MR-Linac
OBJECTIVE: This study investigates the impact of a restricted craniocaudal (CC) field length of <20 cm on the selection of head and neck cancer (HNC) patients who can be treated on the MR-Linac using a single isocentre technique. We also assess the effects of anthropometric factors and the neck p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The British Institute of Radiology.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7336067/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32436787 http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20200023 |
_version_ | 1783554242405990400 |
---|---|
author | Ng-Cheng-Hin, Brian Nutting, Christopher Newbold, Kate Bhide, Shreerang McQuaid, Dualta Dunlop, Alex Harrington, Kevin Wong, Kee Howe |
author_facet | Ng-Cheng-Hin, Brian Nutting, Christopher Newbold, Kate Bhide, Shreerang McQuaid, Dualta Dunlop, Alex Harrington, Kevin Wong, Kee Howe |
author_sort | Ng-Cheng-Hin, Brian |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: This study investigates the impact of a restricted craniocaudal (CC) field length of <20 cm on the selection of head and neck cancer (HNC) patients who can be treated on the MR-Linac using a single isocentre technique. We also assess the effects of anthropometric factors and the neck position on the CC field length. METHODS: 110 HNC patients who underwent radical primary or adjuvant radiotherapy were retrospectively analysed. We assessed the proportion of treatment fields with a CC length of <20 cm and the effects of gender, height, hyo-sternal neck length (distance from superior surface of hyoid to sternal notch measured on the coronal reconstruction of the planning CT) and neck position on CC length. RESULTS: 95% of HNC patients had a CC field length <20 cm. Female patients showed a significantly shorter median CC length than male patients in both extended (p = 0.0003) and neutral (p = 0.008) neck positions. Neck position influenced the median CC length with neutral neck being significantly shorter than extended neck (p = 0.0119). Patient height and hyo-sternal neck length showed positive correlation with the CC length, with neck length in neutral position having the strongest correlation (r = 0.65, p = 0.0001 and r = 0.63, p < 0.0001, respectively for extended neck; r = 0.55, p = 0.0070 and r = 0.80, p < 0.0001, respectively for neutral neck). A hyo-sternal neck length of <14.6 cm predicted a CC length of <20 cm in neutral neck position. CONCLUSION: The majority of patients with HNC at the Royal Marsden Hospital have anthropometric features compatible with their being treated on the MR-Linac using a single isocentre technique. The absolute CC field size may vary according to primary tumour site, patient factors and neck position. A hyo-sternal neck length cut-off of 14.6 cm in the neutral neck position can be used as a surrogate marker for suitability of treatment on MR-Linac. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This paper highlights the potential impact of a restricted CC field in HNC patient selection for the MR-Linac treatment. This is the first report to suggest the use of neck length as a surrogate marker for suitability of treatment on the MR-Linac. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7336067 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | The British Institute of Radiology. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73360672021-07-01 The impact of restricted length of treatment field and anthropometric factors on selection of head and neck cancer patients for treatment on the MR-Linac Ng-Cheng-Hin, Brian Nutting, Christopher Newbold, Kate Bhide, Shreerang McQuaid, Dualta Dunlop, Alex Harrington, Kevin Wong, Kee Howe Br J Radiol Full Paper OBJECTIVE: This study investigates the impact of a restricted craniocaudal (CC) field length of <20 cm on the selection of head and neck cancer (HNC) patients who can be treated on the MR-Linac using a single isocentre technique. We also assess the effects of anthropometric factors and the neck position on the CC field length. METHODS: 110 HNC patients who underwent radical primary or adjuvant radiotherapy were retrospectively analysed. We assessed the proportion of treatment fields with a CC length of <20 cm and the effects of gender, height, hyo-sternal neck length (distance from superior surface of hyoid to sternal notch measured on the coronal reconstruction of the planning CT) and neck position on CC length. RESULTS: 95% of HNC patients had a CC field length <20 cm. Female patients showed a significantly shorter median CC length than male patients in both extended (p = 0.0003) and neutral (p = 0.008) neck positions. Neck position influenced the median CC length with neutral neck being significantly shorter than extended neck (p = 0.0119). Patient height and hyo-sternal neck length showed positive correlation with the CC length, with neck length in neutral position having the strongest correlation (r = 0.65, p = 0.0001 and r = 0.63, p < 0.0001, respectively for extended neck; r = 0.55, p = 0.0070 and r = 0.80, p < 0.0001, respectively for neutral neck). A hyo-sternal neck length of <14.6 cm predicted a CC length of <20 cm in neutral neck position. CONCLUSION: The majority of patients with HNC at the Royal Marsden Hospital have anthropometric features compatible with their being treated on the MR-Linac using a single isocentre technique. The absolute CC field size may vary according to primary tumour site, patient factors and neck position. A hyo-sternal neck length cut-off of 14.6 cm in the neutral neck position can be used as a surrogate marker for suitability of treatment on MR-Linac. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This paper highlights the potential impact of a restricted CC field in HNC patient selection for the MR-Linac treatment. This is the first report to suggest the use of neck length as a surrogate marker for suitability of treatment on the MR-Linac. The British Institute of Radiology. 2020-07-01 2020-05-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7336067/ /pubmed/32436787 http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20200023 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Published by the British Institute of Radiology This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Full Paper Ng-Cheng-Hin, Brian Nutting, Christopher Newbold, Kate Bhide, Shreerang McQuaid, Dualta Dunlop, Alex Harrington, Kevin Wong, Kee Howe The impact of restricted length of treatment field and anthropometric factors on selection of head and neck cancer patients for treatment on the MR-Linac |
title | The impact of restricted length of treatment field and anthropometric factors on selection of head and neck cancer patients for treatment on the MR-Linac |
title_full | The impact of restricted length of treatment field and anthropometric factors on selection of head and neck cancer patients for treatment on the MR-Linac |
title_fullStr | The impact of restricted length of treatment field and anthropometric factors on selection of head and neck cancer patients for treatment on the MR-Linac |
title_full_unstemmed | The impact of restricted length of treatment field and anthropometric factors on selection of head and neck cancer patients for treatment on the MR-Linac |
title_short | The impact of restricted length of treatment field and anthropometric factors on selection of head and neck cancer patients for treatment on the MR-Linac |
title_sort | impact of restricted length of treatment field and anthropometric factors on selection of head and neck cancer patients for treatment on the mr-linac |
topic | Full Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7336067/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32436787 http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20200023 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ngchenghinbrian theimpactofrestrictedlengthoftreatmentfieldandanthropometricfactorsonselectionofheadandneckcancerpatientsfortreatmentonthemrlinac AT nuttingchristopher theimpactofrestrictedlengthoftreatmentfieldandanthropometricfactorsonselectionofheadandneckcancerpatientsfortreatmentonthemrlinac AT newboldkate theimpactofrestrictedlengthoftreatmentfieldandanthropometricfactorsonselectionofheadandneckcancerpatientsfortreatmentonthemrlinac AT bhideshreerang theimpactofrestrictedlengthoftreatmentfieldandanthropometricfactorsonselectionofheadandneckcancerpatientsfortreatmentonthemrlinac AT mcquaiddualta theimpactofrestrictedlengthoftreatmentfieldandanthropometricfactorsonselectionofheadandneckcancerpatientsfortreatmentonthemrlinac AT dunlopalex theimpactofrestrictedlengthoftreatmentfieldandanthropometricfactorsonselectionofheadandneckcancerpatientsfortreatmentonthemrlinac AT harringtonkevin theimpactofrestrictedlengthoftreatmentfieldandanthropometricfactorsonselectionofheadandneckcancerpatientsfortreatmentonthemrlinac AT wongkeehowe theimpactofrestrictedlengthoftreatmentfieldandanthropometricfactorsonselectionofheadandneckcancerpatientsfortreatmentonthemrlinac AT ngchenghinbrian impactofrestrictedlengthoftreatmentfieldandanthropometricfactorsonselectionofheadandneckcancerpatientsfortreatmentonthemrlinac AT nuttingchristopher impactofrestrictedlengthoftreatmentfieldandanthropometricfactorsonselectionofheadandneckcancerpatientsfortreatmentonthemrlinac AT newboldkate impactofrestrictedlengthoftreatmentfieldandanthropometricfactorsonselectionofheadandneckcancerpatientsfortreatmentonthemrlinac AT bhideshreerang impactofrestrictedlengthoftreatmentfieldandanthropometricfactorsonselectionofheadandneckcancerpatientsfortreatmentonthemrlinac AT mcquaiddualta impactofrestrictedlengthoftreatmentfieldandanthropometricfactorsonselectionofheadandneckcancerpatientsfortreatmentonthemrlinac AT dunlopalex impactofrestrictedlengthoftreatmentfieldandanthropometricfactorsonselectionofheadandneckcancerpatientsfortreatmentonthemrlinac AT harringtonkevin impactofrestrictedlengthoftreatmentfieldandanthropometricfactorsonselectionofheadandneckcancerpatientsfortreatmentonthemrlinac AT wongkeehowe impactofrestrictedlengthoftreatmentfieldandanthropometricfactorsonselectionofheadandneckcancerpatientsfortreatmentonthemrlinac |