Cargando…

The impact of restricted length of treatment field and anthropometric factors on selection of head and neck cancer patients for treatment on the MR-Linac

OBJECTIVE: This study investigates the impact of a restricted craniocaudal (CC) field length of <20 cm on the selection of head and neck cancer (HNC) patients who can be treated on the MR-Linac using a single isocentre technique. We also assess the effects of anthropometric factors and the neck p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ng-Cheng-Hin, Brian, Nutting, Christopher, Newbold, Kate, Bhide, Shreerang, McQuaid, Dualta, Dunlop, Alex, Harrington, Kevin, Wong, Kee Howe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The British Institute of Radiology. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7336067/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32436787
http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20200023
_version_ 1783554242405990400
author Ng-Cheng-Hin, Brian
Nutting, Christopher
Newbold, Kate
Bhide, Shreerang
McQuaid, Dualta
Dunlop, Alex
Harrington, Kevin
Wong, Kee Howe
author_facet Ng-Cheng-Hin, Brian
Nutting, Christopher
Newbold, Kate
Bhide, Shreerang
McQuaid, Dualta
Dunlop, Alex
Harrington, Kevin
Wong, Kee Howe
author_sort Ng-Cheng-Hin, Brian
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study investigates the impact of a restricted craniocaudal (CC) field length of <20 cm on the selection of head and neck cancer (HNC) patients who can be treated on the MR-Linac using a single isocentre technique. We also assess the effects of anthropometric factors and the neck position on the CC field length. METHODS: 110 HNC patients who underwent radical primary or adjuvant radiotherapy were retrospectively analysed. We assessed the proportion of treatment fields with a CC length of <20 cm and the effects of gender, height, hyo-sternal neck length (distance from superior surface of hyoid to sternal notch measured on the coronal reconstruction of the planning CT) and neck position on CC length. RESULTS: 95% of HNC patients had a CC field length <20 cm. Female patients showed a significantly shorter median CC length than male patients in both extended (p = 0.0003) and neutral (p = 0.008) neck positions. Neck position influenced the median CC length with neutral neck being significantly shorter than extended neck (p = 0.0119). Patient height and hyo-sternal neck length showed positive correlation with the CC length, with neck length in neutral position having the strongest correlation (r = 0.65, p = 0.0001 and r = 0.63, p < 0.0001, respectively for extended neck; r = 0.55, p = 0.0070 and r = 0.80, p < 0.0001, respectively for neutral neck). A hyo-sternal neck length of <14.6 cm predicted a CC length of <20 cm in neutral neck position. CONCLUSION: The majority of patients with HNC at the Royal Marsden Hospital have anthropometric features compatible with their being treated on the MR-Linac using a single isocentre technique. The absolute CC field size may vary according to primary tumour site, patient factors and neck position. A hyo-sternal neck length cut-off of 14.6 cm in the neutral neck position can be used as a surrogate marker for suitability of treatment on MR-Linac. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This paper highlights the potential impact of a restricted CC field in HNC patient selection for the MR-Linac treatment. This is the first report to suggest the use of neck length as a surrogate marker for suitability of treatment on the MR-Linac.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7336067
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher The British Institute of Radiology.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73360672021-07-01 The impact of restricted length of treatment field and anthropometric factors on selection of head and neck cancer patients for treatment on the MR-Linac Ng-Cheng-Hin, Brian Nutting, Christopher Newbold, Kate Bhide, Shreerang McQuaid, Dualta Dunlop, Alex Harrington, Kevin Wong, Kee Howe Br J Radiol Full Paper OBJECTIVE: This study investigates the impact of a restricted craniocaudal (CC) field length of <20 cm on the selection of head and neck cancer (HNC) patients who can be treated on the MR-Linac using a single isocentre technique. We also assess the effects of anthropometric factors and the neck position on the CC field length. METHODS: 110 HNC patients who underwent radical primary or adjuvant radiotherapy were retrospectively analysed. We assessed the proportion of treatment fields with a CC length of <20 cm and the effects of gender, height, hyo-sternal neck length (distance from superior surface of hyoid to sternal notch measured on the coronal reconstruction of the planning CT) and neck position on CC length. RESULTS: 95% of HNC patients had a CC field length <20 cm. Female patients showed a significantly shorter median CC length than male patients in both extended (p = 0.0003) and neutral (p = 0.008) neck positions. Neck position influenced the median CC length with neutral neck being significantly shorter than extended neck (p = 0.0119). Patient height and hyo-sternal neck length showed positive correlation with the CC length, with neck length in neutral position having the strongest correlation (r = 0.65, p = 0.0001 and r = 0.63, p < 0.0001, respectively for extended neck; r = 0.55, p = 0.0070 and r = 0.80, p < 0.0001, respectively for neutral neck). A hyo-sternal neck length of <14.6 cm predicted a CC length of <20 cm in neutral neck position. CONCLUSION: The majority of patients with HNC at the Royal Marsden Hospital have anthropometric features compatible with their being treated on the MR-Linac using a single isocentre technique. The absolute CC field size may vary according to primary tumour site, patient factors and neck position. A hyo-sternal neck length cut-off of 14.6 cm in the neutral neck position can be used as a surrogate marker for suitability of treatment on MR-Linac. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This paper highlights the potential impact of a restricted CC field in HNC patient selection for the MR-Linac treatment. This is the first report to suggest the use of neck length as a surrogate marker for suitability of treatment on the MR-Linac. The British Institute of Radiology. 2020-07-01 2020-05-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7336067/ /pubmed/32436787 http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20200023 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Published by the British Institute of Radiology This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Full Paper
Ng-Cheng-Hin, Brian
Nutting, Christopher
Newbold, Kate
Bhide, Shreerang
McQuaid, Dualta
Dunlop, Alex
Harrington, Kevin
Wong, Kee Howe
The impact of restricted length of treatment field and anthropometric factors on selection of head and neck cancer patients for treatment on the MR-Linac
title The impact of restricted length of treatment field and anthropometric factors on selection of head and neck cancer patients for treatment on the MR-Linac
title_full The impact of restricted length of treatment field and anthropometric factors on selection of head and neck cancer patients for treatment on the MR-Linac
title_fullStr The impact of restricted length of treatment field and anthropometric factors on selection of head and neck cancer patients for treatment on the MR-Linac
title_full_unstemmed The impact of restricted length of treatment field and anthropometric factors on selection of head and neck cancer patients for treatment on the MR-Linac
title_short The impact of restricted length of treatment field and anthropometric factors on selection of head and neck cancer patients for treatment on the MR-Linac
title_sort impact of restricted length of treatment field and anthropometric factors on selection of head and neck cancer patients for treatment on the mr-linac
topic Full Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7336067/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32436787
http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20200023
work_keys_str_mv AT ngchenghinbrian theimpactofrestrictedlengthoftreatmentfieldandanthropometricfactorsonselectionofheadandneckcancerpatientsfortreatmentonthemrlinac
AT nuttingchristopher theimpactofrestrictedlengthoftreatmentfieldandanthropometricfactorsonselectionofheadandneckcancerpatientsfortreatmentonthemrlinac
AT newboldkate theimpactofrestrictedlengthoftreatmentfieldandanthropometricfactorsonselectionofheadandneckcancerpatientsfortreatmentonthemrlinac
AT bhideshreerang theimpactofrestrictedlengthoftreatmentfieldandanthropometricfactorsonselectionofheadandneckcancerpatientsfortreatmentonthemrlinac
AT mcquaiddualta theimpactofrestrictedlengthoftreatmentfieldandanthropometricfactorsonselectionofheadandneckcancerpatientsfortreatmentonthemrlinac
AT dunlopalex theimpactofrestrictedlengthoftreatmentfieldandanthropometricfactorsonselectionofheadandneckcancerpatientsfortreatmentonthemrlinac
AT harringtonkevin theimpactofrestrictedlengthoftreatmentfieldandanthropometricfactorsonselectionofheadandneckcancerpatientsfortreatmentonthemrlinac
AT wongkeehowe theimpactofrestrictedlengthoftreatmentfieldandanthropometricfactorsonselectionofheadandneckcancerpatientsfortreatmentonthemrlinac
AT ngchenghinbrian impactofrestrictedlengthoftreatmentfieldandanthropometricfactorsonselectionofheadandneckcancerpatientsfortreatmentonthemrlinac
AT nuttingchristopher impactofrestrictedlengthoftreatmentfieldandanthropometricfactorsonselectionofheadandneckcancerpatientsfortreatmentonthemrlinac
AT newboldkate impactofrestrictedlengthoftreatmentfieldandanthropometricfactorsonselectionofheadandneckcancerpatientsfortreatmentonthemrlinac
AT bhideshreerang impactofrestrictedlengthoftreatmentfieldandanthropometricfactorsonselectionofheadandneckcancerpatientsfortreatmentonthemrlinac
AT mcquaiddualta impactofrestrictedlengthoftreatmentfieldandanthropometricfactorsonselectionofheadandneckcancerpatientsfortreatmentonthemrlinac
AT dunlopalex impactofrestrictedlengthoftreatmentfieldandanthropometricfactorsonselectionofheadandneckcancerpatientsfortreatmentonthemrlinac
AT harringtonkevin impactofrestrictedlengthoftreatmentfieldandanthropometricfactorsonselectionofheadandneckcancerpatientsfortreatmentonthemrlinac
AT wongkeehowe impactofrestrictedlengthoftreatmentfieldandanthropometricfactorsonselectionofheadandneckcancerpatientsfortreatmentonthemrlinac