Cargando…

Temporal dynamics of the flash‐induced bouncing effect

Two identical visual disks moving toward each other on a two‐dimensional (2D) display are more likely to be perceived as “streaming through” than “bouncing off” each other after their coincidence. However, either a brief auditory tone or visual flash presented at the coincident moment of the disks c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhong, Hui, Zhao, Song, Chen, Tingji, Yang, Wanlu, Huang, Xinyin, Feng, Wenfeng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7336162/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32202025
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.24993
_version_ 1783554261384167424
author Zhong, Hui
Zhao, Song
Chen, Tingji
Yang, Wanlu
Huang, Xinyin
Feng, Wenfeng
author_facet Zhong, Hui
Zhao, Song
Chen, Tingji
Yang, Wanlu
Huang, Xinyin
Feng, Wenfeng
author_sort Zhong, Hui
collection PubMed
description Two identical visual disks moving toward each other on a two‐dimensional (2D) display are more likely to be perceived as “streaming through” than “bouncing off” each other after their coincidence. However, either a brief auditory tone or visual flash presented at the coincident moment of the disks can strikingly increase the incidence of the bouncing percept. Despite the neural substrates underlying the sound‐induced bouncing effect have been widely investigated, little is known about the neural mechanisms underlying the flash‐induced bouncing effect. The present study used event‐related potential recordings to explore the temporal dynamics of the flash‐induced bouncing effect. The results showed that the amplitude of the postcoincidence parietooccipital P2 component (190–230 ms after coincidence) elicited by the visual motion was significantly smaller on bouncing relative to streaming trials only when the flash was presented but not when absent. In addition, the parietal P3 component (330–430 ms) was found to be larger on bouncing than streaming trials when the flash was presented, but the opposite was true when no flash was presented. These electrophysiological findings suggest that the flash‐induced bouncing effect may occur at both perceptual and postperceptual stages of processing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7336162
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73361622020-07-08 Temporal dynamics of the flash‐induced bouncing effect Zhong, Hui Zhao, Song Chen, Tingji Yang, Wanlu Huang, Xinyin Feng, Wenfeng Hum Brain Mapp Research Articles Two identical visual disks moving toward each other on a two‐dimensional (2D) display are more likely to be perceived as “streaming through” than “bouncing off” each other after their coincidence. However, either a brief auditory tone or visual flash presented at the coincident moment of the disks can strikingly increase the incidence of the bouncing percept. Despite the neural substrates underlying the sound‐induced bouncing effect have been widely investigated, little is known about the neural mechanisms underlying the flash‐induced bouncing effect. The present study used event‐related potential recordings to explore the temporal dynamics of the flash‐induced bouncing effect. The results showed that the amplitude of the postcoincidence parietooccipital P2 component (190–230 ms after coincidence) elicited by the visual motion was significantly smaller on bouncing relative to streaming trials only when the flash was presented but not when absent. In addition, the parietal P3 component (330–430 ms) was found to be larger on bouncing than streaming trials when the flash was presented, but the opposite was true when no flash was presented. These electrophysiological findings suggest that the flash‐induced bouncing effect may occur at both perceptual and postperceptual stages of processing. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2020-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7336162/ /pubmed/32202025 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.24993 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Human Brain Mapping published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Zhong, Hui
Zhao, Song
Chen, Tingji
Yang, Wanlu
Huang, Xinyin
Feng, Wenfeng
Temporal dynamics of the flash‐induced bouncing effect
title Temporal dynamics of the flash‐induced bouncing effect
title_full Temporal dynamics of the flash‐induced bouncing effect
title_fullStr Temporal dynamics of the flash‐induced bouncing effect
title_full_unstemmed Temporal dynamics of the flash‐induced bouncing effect
title_short Temporal dynamics of the flash‐induced bouncing effect
title_sort temporal dynamics of the flash‐induced bouncing effect
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7336162/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32202025
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.24993
work_keys_str_mv AT zhonghui temporaldynamicsoftheflashinducedbouncingeffect
AT zhaosong temporaldynamicsoftheflashinducedbouncingeffect
AT chentingji temporaldynamicsoftheflashinducedbouncingeffect
AT yangwanlu temporaldynamicsoftheflashinducedbouncingeffect
AT huangxinyin temporaldynamicsoftheflashinducedbouncingeffect
AT fengwenfeng temporaldynamicsoftheflashinducedbouncingeffect