Cargando…
Diagnostic cytogenetic testing following positive noninvasive prenatal screening results of sex chromosome abnormalities: Report of five cases and systematic review of evidence
BACKGROUND: Follow‐up cytogenetic analysis has been recommended for cases with positive noninvasive prenatal screening (NIPS) results. This study of five cases with numerical and structural sex chromosomal abnormalities (SCA) and a review of large case series of NIPS provided guidance to improve pre...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7336728/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32383339 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mgg3.1297 |
_version_ | 1783554376048050176 |
---|---|
author | Xie, Xiaolei Tan, Weihe Li, Fuguang Carrano, Eric Ramirez, Paola DiAdamo, Autumn Grommisch, Brittany Amato, Katherine Chai, Hongyan Wen, Jiadi Li, Peining |
author_facet | Xie, Xiaolei Tan, Weihe Li, Fuguang Carrano, Eric Ramirez, Paola DiAdamo, Autumn Grommisch, Brittany Amato, Katherine Chai, Hongyan Wen, Jiadi Li, Peining |
author_sort | Xie, Xiaolei |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Follow‐up cytogenetic analysis has been recommended for cases with positive noninvasive prenatal screening (NIPS) results. This study of five cases with numerical and structural sex chromosomal abnormalities (SCA) and a review of large case series of NIPS provided guidance to improve prenatal diagnosis for SCA. METHODS: Following positive NIPS results for SCA, karyotype analysis, chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA), fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and locus‐specific quantitative PCR were performed on cultured amniocytes, chorionic villi cells, and stimulated lymphocytes. Review of large case series was performed to evaluate the NIPS positive rate, follow‐up rate of cytogenetic analysis, positive predictive value (PPV) for major types of SCA, and relative frequencies of subtypes of major SCA. RESULTS: Of the five cases with positive NIPS for SCA, case 1 showed a mosaic pattern of monosomy X and isodicentric Y; case 2 showed a mosaic pattern of monosomy X confined to the placenta; cases 3 and 4 had an isochromosome of Xq, and case 5 showed a derivative chromosome 14 from a Yq/14p translocation of maternal origin. Review of literature showed that mean positive rate of NIPS for SCA was 0.61%, follow‐up rate of cytogenetics analysis was 76%, and mean PPV for SCA was 48%. Mosaic patterns and structural rearrangements involving sex chromosomes were estimated in 3%–20% and 3% of SCA cases, respectively. CONCLUSION: These five cases further demonstrated the necessity to pursue follow‐up cytogenetic analysis to characterize mosaic patterns and structural abnormalities involving sex chromosomes and their value for prenatal genetic counseling. A workflow showing the performance of current NIPS and cytogenetic analysis for SCA was summarized. These results could facilitate an evidence‐based approach to guide prenatal diagnosis of SCA. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7336728 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73367282020-07-08 Diagnostic cytogenetic testing following positive noninvasive prenatal screening results of sex chromosome abnormalities: Report of five cases and systematic review of evidence Xie, Xiaolei Tan, Weihe Li, Fuguang Carrano, Eric Ramirez, Paola DiAdamo, Autumn Grommisch, Brittany Amato, Katherine Chai, Hongyan Wen, Jiadi Li, Peining Mol Genet Genomic Med Review Articles BACKGROUND: Follow‐up cytogenetic analysis has been recommended for cases with positive noninvasive prenatal screening (NIPS) results. This study of five cases with numerical and structural sex chromosomal abnormalities (SCA) and a review of large case series of NIPS provided guidance to improve prenatal diagnosis for SCA. METHODS: Following positive NIPS results for SCA, karyotype analysis, chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA), fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and locus‐specific quantitative PCR were performed on cultured amniocytes, chorionic villi cells, and stimulated lymphocytes. Review of large case series was performed to evaluate the NIPS positive rate, follow‐up rate of cytogenetic analysis, positive predictive value (PPV) for major types of SCA, and relative frequencies of subtypes of major SCA. RESULTS: Of the five cases with positive NIPS for SCA, case 1 showed a mosaic pattern of monosomy X and isodicentric Y; case 2 showed a mosaic pattern of monosomy X confined to the placenta; cases 3 and 4 had an isochromosome of Xq, and case 5 showed a derivative chromosome 14 from a Yq/14p translocation of maternal origin. Review of literature showed that mean positive rate of NIPS for SCA was 0.61%, follow‐up rate of cytogenetics analysis was 76%, and mean PPV for SCA was 48%. Mosaic patterns and structural rearrangements involving sex chromosomes were estimated in 3%–20% and 3% of SCA cases, respectively. CONCLUSION: These five cases further demonstrated the necessity to pursue follow‐up cytogenetic analysis to characterize mosaic patterns and structural abnormalities involving sex chromosomes and their value for prenatal genetic counseling. A workflow showing the performance of current NIPS and cytogenetic analysis for SCA was summarized. These results could facilitate an evidence‐based approach to guide prenatal diagnosis of SCA. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7336728/ /pubmed/32383339 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mgg3.1297 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals LLC This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Articles Xie, Xiaolei Tan, Weihe Li, Fuguang Carrano, Eric Ramirez, Paola DiAdamo, Autumn Grommisch, Brittany Amato, Katherine Chai, Hongyan Wen, Jiadi Li, Peining Diagnostic cytogenetic testing following positive noninvasive prenatal screening results of sex chromosome abnormalities: Report of five cases and systematic review of evidence |
title | Diagnostic cytogenetic testing following positive noninvasive prenatal screening results of sex chromosome abnormalities: Report of five cases and systematic review of evidence |
title_full | Diagnostic cytogenetic testing following positive noninvasive prenatal screening results of sex chromosome abnormalities: Report of five cases and systematic review of evidence |
title_fullStr | Diagnostic cytogenetic testing following positive noninvasive prenatal screening results of sex chromosome abnormalities: Report of five cases and systematic review of evidence |
title_full_unstemmed | Diagnostic cytogenetic testing following positive noninvasive prenatal screening results of sex chromosome abnormalities: Report of five cases and systematic review of evidence |
title_short | Diagnostic cytogenetic testing following positive noninvasive prenatal screening results of sex chromosome abnormalities: Report of five cases and systematic review of evidence |
title_sort | diagnostic cytogenetic testing following positive noninvasive prenatal screening results of sex chromosome abnormalities: report of five cases and systematic review of evidence |
topic | Review Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7336728/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32383339 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mgg3.1297 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT xiexiaolei diagnosticcytogenetictestingfollowingpositivenoninvasiveprenatalscreeningresultsofsexchromosomeabnormalitiesreportoffivecasesandsystematicreviewofevidence AT tanweihe diagnosticcytogenetictestingfollowingpositivenoninvasiveprenatalscreeningresultsofsexchromosomeabnormalitiesreportoffivecasesandsystematicreviewofevidence AT lifuguang diagnosticcytogenetictestingfollowingpositivenoninvasiveprenatalscreeningresultsofsexchromosomeabnormalitiesreportoffivecasesandsystematicreviewofevidence AT carranoeric diagnosticcytogenetictestingfollowingpositivenoninvasiveprenatalscreeningresultsofsexchromosomeabnormalitiesreportoffivecasesandsystematicreviewofevidence AT ramirezpaola diagnosticcytogenetictestingfollowingpositivenoninvasiveprenatalscreeningresultsofsexchromosomeabnormalitiesreportoffivecasesandsystematicreviewofevidence AT diadamoautumn diagnosticcytogenetictestingfollowingpositivenoninvasiveprenatalscreeningresultsofsexchromosomeabnormalitiesreportoffivecasesandsystematicreviewofevidence AT grommischbrittany diagnosticcytogenetictestingfollowingpositivenoninvasiveprenatalscreeningresultsofsexchromosomeabnormalitiesreportoffivecasesandsystematicreviewofevidence AT amatokatherine diagnosticcytogenetictestingfollowingpositivenoninvasiveprenatalscreeningresultsofsexchromosomeabnormalitiesreportoffivecasesandsystematicreviewofevidence AT chaihongyan diagnosticcytogenetictestingfollowingpositivenoninvasiveprenatalscreeningresultsofsexchromosomeabnormalitiesreportoffivecasesandsystematicreviewofevidence AT wenjiadi diagnosticcytogenetictestingfollowingpositivenoninvasiveprenatalscreeningresultsofsexchromosomeabnormalitiesreportoffivecasesandsystematicreviewofevidence AT lipeining diagnosticcytogenetictestingfollowingpositivenoninvasiveprenatalscreeningresultsofsexchromosomeabnormalitiesreportoffivecasesandsystematicreviewofevidence |