Cargando…

Diagnostic cytogenetic testing following positive noninvasive prenatal screening results of sex chromosome abnormalities: Report of five cases and systematic review of evidence

BACKGROUND: Follow‐up cytogenetic analysis has been recommended for cases with positive noninvasive prenatal screening (NIPS) results. This study of five cases with numerical and structural sex chromosomal abnormalities (SCA) and a review of large case series of NIPS provided guidance to improve pre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xie, Xiaolei, Tan, Weihe, Li, Fuguang, Carrano, Eric, Ramirez, Paola, DiAdamo, Autumn, Grommisch, Brittany, Amato, Katherine, Chai, Hongyan, Wen, Jiadi, Li, Peining
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7336728/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32383339
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mgg3.1297
_version_ 1783554376048050176
author Xie, Xiaolei
Tan, Weihe
Li, Fuguang
Carrano, Eric
Ramirez, Paola
DiAdamo, Autumn
Grommisch, Brittany
Amato, Katherine
Chai, Hongyan
Wen, Jiadi
Li, Peining
author_facet Xie, Xiaolei
Tan, Weihe
Li, Fuguang
Carrano, Eric
Ramirez, Paola
DiAdamo, Autumn
Grommisch, Brittany
Amato, Katherine
Chai, Hongyan
Wen, Jiadi
Li, Peining
author_sort Xie, Xiaolei
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Follow‐up cytogenetic analysis has been recommended for cases with positive noninvasive prenatal screening (NIPS) results. This study of five cases with numerical and structural sex chromosomal abnormalities (SCA) and a review of large case series of NIPS provided guidance to improve prenatal diagnosis for SCA. METHODS: Following positive NIPS results for SCA, karyotype analysis, chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA), fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and locus‐specific quantitative PCR were performed on cultured amniocytes, chorionic villi cells, and stimulated lymphocytes. Review of large case series was performed to evaluate the NIPS positive rate, follow‐up rate of cytogenetic analysis, positive predictive value (PPV) for major types of SCA, and relative frequencies of subtypes of major SCA. RESULTS: Of the five cases with positive NIPS for SCA, case 1 showed a mosaic pattern of monosomy X and isodicentric Y; case 2 showed a mosaic pattern of monosomy X confined to the placenta; cases 3 and 4 had an isochromosome of Xq, and case 5 showed a derivative chromosome 14 from a Yq/14p translocation of maternal origin. Review of literature showed that mean positive rate of NIPS for SCA was 0.61%, follow‐up rate of cytogenetics analysis was 76%, and mean PPV for SCA was 48%. Mosaic patterns and structural rearrangements involving sex chromosomes were estimated in 3%–20% and 3% of SCA cases, respectively. CONCLUSION: These five cases further demonstrated the necessity to pursue follow‐up cytogenetic analysis to characterize mosaic patterns and structural abnormalities involving sex chromosomes and their value for prenatal genetic counseling. A workflow showing the performance of current NIPS and cytogenetic analysis for SCA was summarized. These results could facilitate an evidence‐based approach to guide prenatal diagnosis of SCA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7336728
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73367282020-07-08 Diagnostic cytogenetic testing following positive noninvasive prenatal screening results of sex chromosome abnormalities: Report of five cases and systematic review of evidence Xie, Xiaolei Tan, Weihe Li, Fuguang Carrano, Eric Ramirez, Paola DiAdamo, Autumn Grommisch, Brittany Amato, Katherine Chai, Hongyan Wen, Jiadi Li, Peining Mol Genet Genomic Med Review Articles BACKGROUND: Follow‐up cytogenetic analysis has been recommended for cases with positive noninvasive prenatal screening (NIPS) results. This study of five cases with numerical and structural sex chromosomal abnormalities (SCA) and a review of large case series of NIPS provided guidance to improve prenatal diagnosis for SCA. METHODS: Following positive NIPS results for SCA, karyotype analysis, chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA), fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and locus‐specific quantitative PCR were performed on cultured amniocytes, chorionic villi cells, and stimulated lymphocytes. Review of large case series was performed to evaluate the NIPS positive rate, follow‐up rate of cytogenetic analysis, positive predictive value (PPV) for major types of SCA, and relative frequencies of subtypes of major SCA. RESULTS: Of the five cases with positive NIPS for SCA, case 1 showed a mosaic pattern of monosomy X and isodicentric Y; case 2 showed a mosaic pattern of monosomy X confined to the placenta; cases 3 and 4 had an isochromosome of Xq, and case 5 showed a derivative chromosome 14 from a Yq/14p translocation of maternal origin. Review of literature showed that mean positive rate of NIPS for SCA was 0.61%, follow‐up rate of cytogenetics analysis was 76%, and mean PPV for SCA was 48%. Mosaic patterns and structural rearrangements involving sex chromosomes were estimated in 3%–20% and 3% of SCA cases, respectively. CONCLUSION: These five cases further demonstrated the necessity to pursue follow‐up cytogenetic analysis to characterize mosaic patterns and structural abnormalities involving sex chromosomes and their value for prenatal genetic counseling. A workflow showing the performance of current NIPS and cytogenetic analysis for SCA was summarized. These results could facilitate an evidence‐based approach to guide prenatal diagnosis of SCA. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7336728/ /pubmed/32383339 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mgg3.1297 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals LLC This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Articles
Xie, Xiaolei
Tan, Weihe
Li, Fuguang
Carrano, Eric
Ramirez, Paola
DiAdamo, Autumn
Grommisch, Brittany
Amato, Katherine
Chai, Hongyan
Wen, Jiadi
Li, Peining
Diagnostic cytogenetic testing following positive noninvasive prenatal screening results of sex chromosome abnormalities: Report of five cases and systematic review of evidence
title Diagnostic cytogenetic testing following positive noninvasive prenatal screening results of sex chromosome abnormalities: Report of five cases and systematic review of evidence
title_full Diagnostic cytogenetic testing following positive noninvasive prenatal screening results of sex chromosome abnormalities: Report of five cases and systematic review of evidence
title_fullStr Diagnostic cytogenetic testing following positive noninvasive prenatal screening results of sex chromosome abnormalities: Report of five cases and systematic review of evidence
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic cytogenetic testing following positive noninvasive prenatal screening results of sex chromosome abnormalities: Report of five cases and systematic review of evidence
title_short Diagnostic cytogenetic testing following positive noninvasive prenatal screening results of sex chromosome abnormalities: Report of five cases and systematic review of evidence
title_sort diagnostic cytogenetic testing following positive noninvasive prenatal screening results of sex chromosome abnormalities: report of five cases and systematic review of evidence
topic Review Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7336728/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32383339
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mgg3.1297
work_keys_str_mv AT xiexiaolei diagnosticcytogenetictestingfollowingpositivenoninvasiveprenatalscreeningresultsofsexchromosomeabnormalitiesreportoffivecasesandsystematicreviewofevidence
AT tanweihe diagnosticcytogenetictestingfollowingpositivenoninvasiveprenatalscreeningresultsofsexchromosomeabnormalitiesreportoffivecasesandsystematicreviewofevidence
AT lifuguang diagnosticcytogenetictestingfollowingpositivenoninvasiveprenatalscreeningresultsofsexchromosomeabnormalitiesreportoffivecasesandsystematicreviewofevidence
AT carranoeric diagnosticcytogenetictestingfollowingpositivenoninvasiveprenatalscreeningresultsofsexchromosomeabnormalitiesreportoffivecasesandsystematicreviewofevidence
AT ramirezpaola diagnosticcytogenetictestingfollowingpositivenoninvasiveprenatalscreeningresultsofsexchromosomeabnormalitiesreportoffivecasesandsystematicreviewofevidence
AT diadamoautumn diagnosticcytogenetictestingfollowingpositivenoninvasiveprenatalscreeningresultsofsexchromosomeabnormalitiesreportoffivecasesandsystematicreviewofevidence
AT grommischbrittany diagnosticcytogenetictestingfollowingpositivenoninvasiveprenatalscreeningresultsofsexchromosomeabnormalitiesreportoffivecasesandsystematicreviewofevidence
AT amatokatherine diagnosticcytogenetictestingfollowingpositivenoninvasiveprenatalscreeningresultsofsexchromosomeabnormalitiesreportoffivecasesandsystematicreviewofevidence
AT chaihongyan diagnosticcytogenetictestingfollowingpositivenoninvasiveprenatalscreeningresultsofsexchromosomeabnormalitiesreportoffivecasesandsystematicreviewofevidence
AT wenjiadi diagnosticcytogenetictestingfollowingpositivenoninvasiveprenatalscreeningresultsofsexchromosomeabnormalitiesreportoffivecasesandsystematicreviewofevidence
AT lipeining diagnosticcytogenetictestingfollowingpositivenoninvasiveprenatalscreeningresultsofsexchromosomeabnormalitiesreportoffivecasesandsystematicreviewofevidence