Cargando…
Examining the mechanisms underlying the acquisition of animal tool behaviour
Despite major advances in the study of animal tool behaviour, researchers continue to debate how exactly certain behaviours are acquired. While specific mechanisms, such as genetic predispositions or action copying, are sometimes suspected to play a major role in behavioural acquisition, controlled...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7336849/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32486940 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2020.0122 |
_version_ | 1783554403177857024 |
---|---|
author | Bandini, Elisa Motes-Rodrigo, Alba Steele, Matthew P. Rutz, Christian Tennie, Claudio |
author_facet | Bandini, Elisa Motes-Rodrigo, Alba Steele, Matthew P. Rutz, Christian Tennie, Claudio |
author_sort | Bandini, Elisa |
collection | PubMed |
description | Despite major advances in the study of animal tool behaviour, researchers continue to debate how exactly certain behaviours are acquired. While specific mechanisms, such as genetic predispositions or action copying, are sometimes suspected to play a major role in behavioural acquisition, controlled experiments are required to provide conclusive evidence. In this opinion piece, we refer to classic ethological methodologies to emphasize the need for studying the relative contributions of different factors to the emergence of specific tool behaviours. We describe a methodology, consisting of a carefully staged series of baseline and social-learning conditions, that enables us to tease apart the roles of different mechanisms in the development of behavioural repertoires. Experiments employing our proposed methodology will not only advance our understanding of animal learning and culture, but as a result, will also help inform hypotheses about human cognitive, cultural and technological evolution. More generally, our conceptual framework is suitable for guiding the detailed investigation of other seemingly complex animal behaviours. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7336849 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | The Royal Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73368492020-07-08 Examining the mechanisms underlying the acquisition of animal tool behaviour Bandini, Elisa Motes-Rodrigo, Alba Steele, Matthew P. Rutz, Christian Tennie, Claudio Biol Lett Animal Behaviour Despite major advances in the study of animal tool behaviour, researchers continue to debate how exactly certain behaviours are acquired. While specific mechanisms, such as genetic predispositions or action copying, are sometimes suspected to play a major role in behavioural acquisition, controlled experiments are required to provide conclusive evidence. In this opinion piece, we refer to classic ethological methodologies to emphasize the need for studying the relative contributions of different factors to the emergence of specific tool behaviours. We describe a methodology, consisting of a carefully staged series of baseline and social-learning conditions, that enables us to tease apart the roles of different mechanisms in the development of behavioural repertoires. Experiments employing our proposed methodology will not only advance our understanding of animal learning and culture, but as a result, will also help inform hypotheses about human cognitive, cultural and technological evolution. More generally, our conceptual framework is suitable for guiding the detailed investigation of other seemingly complex animal behaviours. The Royal Society 2020-06 2020-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7336849/ /pubmed/32486940 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2020.0122 Text en © 2020 The Authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Animal Behaviour Bandini, Elisa Motes-Rodrigo, Alba Steele, Matthew P. Rutz, Christian Tennie, Claudio Examining the mechanisms underlying the acquisition of animal tool behaviour |
title | Examining the mechanisms underlying the acquisition of animal tool behaviour |
title_full | Examining the mechanisms underlying the acquisition of animal tool behaviour |
title_fullStr | Examining the mechanisms underlying the acquisition of animal tool behaviour |
title_full_unstemmed | Examining the mechanisms underlying the acquisition of animal tool behaviour |
title_short | Examining the mechanisms underlying the acquisition of animal tool behaviour |
title_sort | examining the mechanisms underlying the acquisition of animal tool behaviour |
topic | Animal Behaviour |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7336849/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32486940 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2020.0122 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bandinielisa examiningthemechanismsunderlyingtheacquisitionofanimaltoolbehaviour AT motesrodrigoalba examiningthemechanismsunderlyingtheacquisitionofanimaltoolbehaviour AT steelematthewp examiningthemechanismsunderlyingtheacquisitionofanimaltoolbehaviour AT rutzchristian examiningthemechanismsunderlyingtheacquisitionofanimaltoolbehaviour AT tennieclaudio examiningthemechanismsunderlyingtheacquisitionofanimaltoolbehaviour |